Routine Microaxial Flow Pump Versus Radial Access Revascularization Without Routine Microaxial Flow Pump in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock & Routine Pulmonary Artery Catheterization-based Monitoring With Protocolized Hemodynamic Optimization Versus Simplified Monitoring Without Protocolized Hemodynamic Optimization in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment strategies improve survival in adult patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare four treatment combinations to see if mechanical circulatory support and/or advanced hemodynamic monitoring reduce mortality in AMI-CS patients:
Participants will:
Clinical Effects of Intra-aortic Balloon Support in Early Acute Coronary Syndrome and Non-Acute Coronary Syndrome Related Cardiogenic Shock
Rapid Microaxial Flow Pump Support and Escalation in Patients With Myocardial Infarction Associated Cardiogenic Shock and Persistent Need of Hemodynamic Support