RecruitingInterventionalNot ApplicableLast updated Aug 13, 2026

Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Hybrid Transobturator Tape Versus Conventional Synthetic Tape: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Safety, Efficacy, and Female Sexual Function

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07762300
Lead Sponsor: Benha UniversityOTHER
Brief Summary: This randomized controlled trial compares the safety, efficacy, and impact on female sexual function of a novel hybrid transobturator tape (combining an autologous rectus fascia strip with a polypropylene mesh) versus standard synthetic transobturator tape in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Study Type

Status

Study Record Dates

NCT05448482Unknown status

Hybrid Versus Synthetic TOT for Treatment of SUI

NCT03473041Unknown status

Autologous Rectus Sheath Fascia Versus Midurethral Transobturator Tension Free Vaginal

NCT00744198Unknown status

Autologous Versus Synthetic Versus Biological Sling for Trans-obturator Correction of Urinary Stress Incontinence

NCT03958695Completed

A Tunable-tension Transobturator Tape vs Standard Transobturator Midurethral Tape for Stress Urinary Incontinence

NCT04571346Completed

Female Sling Procedure

NCT06334848Unknown status

Efficacy of Mini Sling Versus Transobturator Tape in Surgical Management of Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence