Transurethral Thermodilatation Versus Prostatic Urethral Lift for Moderate-to-Severe BPH: A Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial
This clinical trial aims to determine whether Prolieve® (microwave with balloon dilation) is as effective as UroLift® (prostate implants) for treating moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms in men aged 50-80 with enlarged prostates (BPH) who have failed oral medications.
The main questions are:
Researchers will compare Prolieve (LA urethral gel only, no injections) against UroLift (LA urethral gel with or without local anaesthetic injection) to see if Prolieve offers similar relief with better tolerability.
Participants will stop their BPH medications for 2-4 weeks, undergo one of the two same-day office procedures, and attend follow-ups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months for symptom scores, flow tests, and bladder scans.
Investigating Medication vs. Prostatic Urethral Lift: Assessment and Comparison of Therapies for BPH
Innovative Minimally Invasive Options in Treatment of Urinary Problems Related to Prostate Enlargement (BPH) in Men
Transperineal Laser Ablation vs Transurethral Resection for Benign Prostatic Obstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Clinical Trial on the Effectiveness of TUMT Compared to PAE in Reducing Severe LUTS in Men with BPH