Influence of the Different Types of Tibial Fixation in the Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee: Osseous Integration, Ligament Maturation and Clinical Results.
Influence of different tibial fixation methods in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: bone integration, graft maturation, and clinical outcomes.
Primary Objective
To assess whether any of the four tibial fixation techniques is superior in terms of:
Graft-bone integration (CT/MRI),
Graft maturation (MRI),
Clinical outcomes (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner scores; manual and instrumented knee stability with KT-1000 arthrometer).
Secondary Objectives
Compare clinical outcomes among groups (IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner).
Compare re-rupture rates and patient satisfaction.
Study Design
Prospective randomized trial.
The study will be registered in the international Clinical Trials registry.
Inclusion Criteria
Age ≥18 years.
Complete ACL rupture treated with arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons.
Exclusion Criteria
Age ≥55 years.
Patients treated with allografts, bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts, or quadriceps tendon grafts.
Malpositioned tunnels (evaluated by MRI at 6 months postop).
Previous knee surgery.
Femoral or tibial deformities.
Multiligament injuries.
Note: Soft tissue procedures (e.g., meniscal repair) are not exclusion criteria.
Randomization
Patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be randomized (via Research Randomizer: https://www.randomizer.org/
) into 3 groups:
Group A (TORN): bioabsorbable interference screw, same diameter as the tunnel.
Group B (TORN+1): bioabsorbable interference screw, one mm larger than the tunnel diameter.
Group C (TORN-BT): interference screw (same size as tunnel) + second fixation with cortical button/plate.
Sample size: 37 patients per group, 111 total.
Follow-up
Radiographic, CT, and MRI evaluation pre-op, at 15 days, and at 1 year post-op.
Clinical and radiological follow-up for 1 year.
Statistical Analysis
In the prospective phase, Student's t-test will be performed for comparison of pre- and postoperative variables. All variables will also be compared between groups and within groups (baseline vs. end of follow-up) using analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Linear regression models will be applied to test for potential significance that could be masked by confounding factors.
Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Joint, by the Method of Stabilization of the Screw With a Bioabsorbable Method, With or Without the Use of Autogenous Spongiform Bone Grafts.
Fixation of Patellar Tendon Grafts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Endobutton vs Metal Interference Screws
Outcome and Tunnel Widening After ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Aperture and Cortical Fixation
Prospective Clinical Results of 3 Different Femoral Fixation in ACL Reconstruction