CompletedInterventionalNot ApplicableLast updated Aug 10, 2026

Comparison of TEP and eTEP Methods in Inguinal Hernia Repair

Comparative Evaluation of eTEP (Extended View Total Extraperitoneal) and TEP(Total Extraperitoneal) Techniques in Minimally Invasive Inguinal Hernia Repair

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07752524
Lead Sponsor: Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalOTHER
Brief Summary: The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) technique provides a wider operative field than the conventional totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique and may facilitate dissection, instrument manipulation, and mesh placement. This study evaluates the potential advantages of eTEP compared with TEP in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
Study Type

Status

Overall Status: Completed
Start Date: May 15, 2023Actual
Primary Completion Date: Nov 10, 2023Actual
Completion Date: Nov 19, 2023Actual

Study Record Dates

First Submitted: Sep 7, 2025
First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Aug 3, 2026
First Posted: Aug 7, 2026Actual
Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Aug 6, 2026
Last Update Posted: Aug 10, 2026Actual
Last Verified: Aug 2026

NCT05504122Completed

Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique

NCT04303182Completed

LESS TEP vs. Three Port TEP for Inguinal Hernia Repair

NCT07108972Active, not recruiting

Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair TEP vs TAPP

NCT02415543Unknown status

SIL-TEP vs TEP for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Day Surgery

NCT03566433Completed

Postoperative Pain After Endoscopic TEP vs. Lichtenstein Hernioplasty in Inguinal Hernia Repair

NCT03276871Completed

Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair