Enrolling by invitationObservationalLast updated Aug 10, 2026

Unilateral Spinal vs General Anaesthesia in Low EF Patients: A Hemodynamic Comparison

Comparison Between Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia and General Anaesthesia in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction (35-40%) Undergoing Lower Limb Surgery in Terms of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability

Overview

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07752303
Lead Sponsor: Sargodha Medical CollegeOTHER
Brief Summary: A difference exists in intraoperative hemodynamic stability and vasopressor requirement between the two techniques
Study Type: Observational

Status

Overall Status: Enrolling by invitation
Start Date: Jul 5, 2026Actual
Primary Completion Date: Dec 2026Estimated
Completion Date: Dec 2026Estimated

Study Record Dates

First Submitted: Aug 3, 2026
First Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Aug 3, 2026
First Posted: Aug 7, 2026Actual
Last Update Submitted that Met QC Criteria: Aug 6, 2026
Last Update Posted: Aug 10, 2026Actual
Last Verified: Aug 2026

NCT07751835Not yet recruiting

Effect of Height Based vs Conventional Dose of Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Surgeries

NCT03106649Unknown status

Echocardiography Based Algorithm for Spinal Anaesthesia

NCT07363941Recruiting

HEIGHT-BASED AND CONVENTIONAL SPINAL ANAESTHETIC DOSING IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS

NCT06767397Active, not recruiting

Factors Influencing Hemodynamic Stability and Its Management in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Surgery Under Spinal and GA

NCT06583213Unknown status

Conventional Spinal Anaesthesia Versus Fractional Spinal Anaesthesia on Hemodynamics

NCT01003561Unknown status

Hemodynamic Changes of Upper and Lower Extremities After Spinal Anesthesia