This prospective randomized study will compare two surgical techniques for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia. Participants will be assigned to either hydrodissection-assisted bipolar prostatic enucleation-enucleoresection with transrectal ultrasound-guided subcapsular injection of diluted norepinephrine and methylene blue or conventional bipolar prostatic enucleation-enucleoresection without injection.
The injected mixture is intended to separate the enlarged prostatic tissue from the surgical capsule and reduce bleeding during surgery. The study will evaluate whether the hydrodissection-assisted technique improves operative conditions, surgical outcomes, postoperative recovery, urinary symptoms, and urinary flow compared with the conventional technique.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
saad.ali@fmed.bu.edu.eg
Participants will undergo transrectal ultrasound-guided subcapsular injection of a diluted norepinephrine-methylene blue mixture to produce hydrodissection between the prostatic adenoma and surgical capsule, followed by bipolar prostatic enucleation-enucleoresection. Standard postoperative bladder irrigation, catheter management, and follow-up will be provided.
Participants will undergo conventional bipolar prostatic enucleation-enucleoresection without subcapsular injection or hydrodissection. Standard postoperative bladder irrigation, catheter management, and follow-up will be provided.
Bipolar Transurethral Enucleation Versus Resection in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: a Comparative Study
Comparative Analysis of Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate Using Different Commercial Types of Electrodes
A Prospective Comparative Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Transurethral Thulium Fiber Laser, Holmium Laser and Bipolar Enucleation of Large Sized Prostate