The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two methods of self assessment of hearing with conventional audiometry in an OTC Hearing Aid for adults with perceived mild to moderate hearing loss. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare the two novel methods with conventional audiometry to determine levels of agreement.
Participants will self assess their hearing methods using two novel methods of hearing assessment as well as receive a conventional audiometric evaluation of hearing levels.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
marisa.poulos@nal.gov.au
Conventional manual pure-tone audiometry
RH210 self-test method 1: detection response method, where the participant presses when they hear the tone or beep
RH210 self-test method 2: audibility-release response method, where the participant releases the response control when they no longer hear the tone or beep
sann.hou@nal.gov.au+61 2 9412 6872
Performance and Effectiveness of a Self-fitting Over-the-counter Hearing Aid
Clinical Evaluation of the RH210 Hearing Aid
Assessing Functional Outcomes and User Experience of the Lexie B3 Pro Powered by Bose Over-the-counter Self-Fitting Hearing Aid
Assessment of Novel Sound Changing Principles in Hearing Instruments to Determine Their Application - 2020_09
Impact of Hearing Aid Service-delivery Model and Technology on Patient Outcomes
Barriers and Facilitators to OTC Hearing Aids Success
Clinical Investigation and Validation of a Self-fitted Air-conduction Hearing Aid
Study of SelfFit Mobile Medical App for Hearing Loss Diagnostics and Hearing Device Fitting / Fine Tuning