This randomized clinical trial aims to compare the accuracy of single-drill (pilot-guided) computer-guided implant surgery versus full-sequence computer-guided dental implant placement. The study evaluates clinical and radiographic outcomes, focusing on apical, angular, coronal, and depth linear deviations using post-operative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) superimposition.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients undergo dental implant placement using full-sequence computer guidance, where implant site preparation and insertion are accomplished using all sequential drills and metal reducers with the surgical guide.
Patients undergo dental implant placement using first-drill (pilot-guided) computer guidance, where the initial pilot osteotomy is performed through the surgical guide, followed by removal of the guide and completion of the remaining sequential drilling and implant placement freehand.
Cairo, Egypt
Accuracy of Trephination-based Versus Drilling-based Guided Dental Implant Placement
Accuracy of Computer- Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients.
Accuracy of Guided Implant Placement Using Artificial Intelligence Segmentation Versus Conventional Technique
The Efficacy of Freehand, Pilot Drilled and Fully Guided Implant Surgery in Partially Edentulous Patients: a Randomize Control Trial
Implant Placement Using a Newly Designed Single Drill Versus Conventional Sequential Drills
Accuracy of Fully Guided Versus Half Guided Implant
Computer Guided Versus Freehand Dental Implant Surgery
Accuracy of Half-guided Implant Placement