The ASPIR study aims to evaluate the cost-utility of outpatient manual vacuum aspiration compared with operating room electric aspiration for the management of first-trimester miscarriage. It is hypothesized that manual aspiration will demonstrate equivalent clinical efficacy and patient quality of life while reducing healthcare costs.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
thibault.thubert@chu-nantes.fr+33253482443
Outpatient manual vacuum aspiration under local anesthesia and inhaled analgesia (MEOPA).
Electric aspiration in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia. Performed in the operating room under general or regional anesthesia, using an electric suction device and appropriate cannula. Post-procedure pelvic ultrasound to confirm complete evacuation.
Manual Versus Electric Vacuum Aspiration for Pregnancy Termination Between 10-14 Weeks
Ultrasound-guided Manual Vacuum Aspiration (USG-MVA)
Hysteroscopic Resection Versus Manual Vacuum Aspiration for Early Pregnancy
Study of the Sensitivity of Manual vs Electric Aspiration to Detect Completed Early Abortion
Analgesia From Conscious Sedation Versus Paracervical Block for Manual Vacuum Aspiration
Comparison of Surgical Management of Early Pregnancy Loss by Suction Curettage Versus Hysteroscopy in Patients Undergoing In-vitro Fertilization (IVF)
Operative Hysteroscopy and Ultrasound Guided Vacuum Aspiration Versus Blind Vacuum Aspiration for the Treatment of Missed Abortion
The Effect of Topical Lidocaine on Pain Scores During Manual Vacuum Aspiration for Nonviable Pregnancies