This study compares two surgical approaches for patients with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and severe emphysema: unilateral (operating on one lung) versus bilateral (operating on both lungs) lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS).
Inclusion Criteria:
Moderate to severe COPD with MRC score > 2 < 75 years old 17 < BMI > 30 FEV1 > 20% and < 45% of predicted RV > 200% of predicted as a sign of relevant hyperinflation DLCO > 20% of predicted The patient should be in ideal medical treatment and have completed rehabilitation A high-resolution CT < 3 months old should follow the referral to MDT Absence of nodules suspicious of malignancy on CT scan Absence of significant comorbidity including severe cardiovascular disease LVEF normal Absence of pulmonary hypertension, TI-gradient < 40 mmHg Absence of chronic or frequent lung infections Smoking abstinence six months prior to surgery Assessed as sufficiently physically fit to undergo surgery and rehabilitation
Exclusion Criteria:
alberte.lund@regionh.dk+4535458016
Surgical Compared to Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction in Patients With Severe Emphysema
Lung Volume Reductions Surgery (LVRS) Study
Randomized Comparison of Awake Nonresectional Versus Nonawake Resectional Lung Volume Reduction Surgery
Unilateral Versus Bilateral Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction A Comparative Case Study
Cost-Effectiveness of Lung Volume Reduction Surgery
LVRS Versus BLVR in Patients With Homogenous Emphysema, CLUB-HE Trial
Effects of Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction on Diaphragm Function and Conformation
Mechanisms of Vascular Damage in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease