Study title: Comparison of clinical, radiographic, histological, and patient-reported outcome/ experience measures of endoscopically-monitored graftless transcrestal sinus floor (TSFE) elevation with 1-stage simultaneous multiple implant placement using osseodensification versus osteotomes in subsinus bone height of 4-5 mm: An 18-month double-arm randomized controlled trial.
Principal investigator: Georgina El-Ghoul, DDS, MSc. Contact: georginaelghoule@gmail.com Institution: Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Saint Joseph University of Beirut, Lebanon.
Introduction You are being asked to participate in a research study comparing 2 different procedures used in graftless TSFE with simultaneous implant placement in areas where there is limited amount of bone (4-5 mm) over a period of 18 months. TSFE is used to elevate the sinus membrane to allow new bone formation under the elevated membrane. TSFE can be achieved using either mechanical tools (osteotome) or specially designed burs (osseodensification burs). Currently, the 2 procedures are used by clinicians worldwide with excellent short- and long-term outcomes.
You fit the selection criteria of patients enrolled in the study because you have partial posterior edentulism with more than one tooth missing and limited bone height below the maxillary sinus, a condition that is typically treated with graftless TSFE and simultaneous implant placement.
Purpose of the study The goal is to evaluate which technique, osseodensification or osteotomes, provides better bone healing, implant stability, and a more comfortable experience for the patient. TSFE procedures are blindly performed without direct intra-operative visualization of the sinus membrane. Since intra-operative sinus membrane perforation has been suggested to increase the risk of implant failure, the incorporation of endoscopy in TSFE provides a real-time magnified intra-operative view of the sinus membrane throughout the entire TSFE and implant placement, thus allowing a precise and controlled sinus elevation with minimal or no risks of perforation.
Procedures involved in this study
If you agree to participate, you will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups:
The following will occur for all participants:
You will be asked to complete surveys about your post-operative course and your overall treatment experience.
Risks involved Beyond the normal post-operative course which include potential discomfort, swelling, and hematoma, infrequent complications may occur such as post-surgical infection, bleeding, vertigo, and muscle spasms related to mouth opening. The CBCT radiation dose used each time is roughly equivalent to 6-9 months of natural background radiation (rocks, sun, air, flights).
Expected benefits to the patient Sinus augmentation will help generate bone around the implants that replace your missing teeth. Your participation will help improve future treatments for other
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Intervention protocol arm 1 experimental group: Osseodensification-mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation (OD-TSFE) where implant recipient sites will be prepared using Densah® burs according to Versah® Lift Protocol II. Osteotomies will preserve at least 1.5 mm of buccal and palatal bone around the implant. Implant length will be selected to achieve approximately 3 mm of apical protrusion into the sinus cavity. Immediate implant placement will then be performed.
the intervention administered for Osteotome-mediated transcrestal sinus floor elevation (OT-TSFE): Implant recipient sites will be prepared using the modified Summers transcrestal osteotome technique with sequential drills and tapered osteotomes according to residual bone height and bone quality. Gentle manual malleting will be used to minimize patient discomfort while limiting sinus membrane elevation to 3 mm. Immediate implant placement will then be performed
Beirut, Lebanon
georginaelghoule@gmail.com961+ 3702448
zeina.majzoub1@usj.edu.lb39 333 426 2418
Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation With or Without Grafting
Clinical Evaluation of Two Types of Transalveolar Sinus Floor Elevation
Osteotome-mediated Sinus Floor Elevation With or Without Grafting Material
Osseodensification Versus Osteotome Internal Sinus Lifting in Delayed Implant Placement
Osseodensification by Densah Burs Versus Osteotome
Transcrestal Sinus Lift Using Osseodensification Versus Lateral Window Technique
SINUS FLOOR WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR LATERAL WINDOW
Endoscopic Assessment of Schneiderian Membrane Perforation During Osseodensification-mediated Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation With Graftless Immediate Implant Placement in Subsinus Bone Height of 4-6 mm: A Pilot Study.