This trial evaluates CITE, a retrieve-and-verify layer that audits an AI-generated care plan against a full-text evidence corpus and flags patient-specific codifiable safety hazards to the clinician. The co-primary outcomes are how accurately CITE flags these hazards (sensitivity and specificity versus blinded clinician adjudication) and its clinician alert burden and acceptance, compared with AI care plans using safety guardrails alone and with unassisted clinician care, in Medicaid primary care.
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Clinician develops the care plan without AI assistance.
AI-generated care plan produced with a safety-guardrail system prompt; no CITE.
AI-generated care plan with safety guardrails, then passed through CITE, which flags unsupported/inappropriate recommendations with evidence citations for the clinician.
CCTA to Optimize Diagnostic Yield of Invasive Angiography With AI
Transforming ED Throughput With AI-Driven Clinical Decision Support System
Point-of-Care AI Assistance and Critical Care Outcomes: A Randomized Trial
Proactive Risk Evaluation for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Strategy Using AI-ECG
Evaluating AI-Gatekeeper Software in Coronary Artery Stenosis Screening: a Multicenter RCT
Effect of AI Critical Appraisal Training on Critical Thinking in Nursing Students
Evaluating an Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Support Tool for Older Adults in Primary Care
Clinical Intelligent Management System Pragmatic RCT