The purpose of this study was to investigate the heart rate bias between cycling and treadmill exercise at ventilatory thresholds. This was a randomized crossover trial involving 23 healthy participants. Each participant performed both cycling and treadmill exercise tests in a randomized order. The primary outcome was to determine the difference in heart rate response at the first and second ventilatory thresholds between the two exercise modalities. We hypothesized that there is a fixed bias in heart rate response, which may have implications for exercise prescription in clinical and rehabilitation settings.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Blinded, experienced raters
Participants in this arm are randomized to perform the continuous ramp cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) on a cycle ergometer first. After a washout period of 7 to 14 days, they cross over to perform the standardized treadmill ramp testing.
Participants in this arm are randomized to perform the standardized treadmill ramp cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using the Porszász algorithm first. After a washout period of 7 to 14 days, they cross over to perform the cycle ergometer ramp testing.
Taipei, Taipei City 10630, Taiwan
Comparison of Exercise Intensity Prescription
Cardiorespiratory Responses to Treadmill Running at Different Slopes
Step-Up vs. Running Exercise at Matched Heart Rate Zones in Sedentary Males
Cardio-Pulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Population
Visa-versa! Breaking Instead of Pushing the Pedals-D
Individualized Exercise Training Based on the Heart Rate Variability in Coronary Heart Disease Patient
Is Threshold-based Training Superior in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Comparison of Multiple Exercise Trainings in Chronic Respiratory Disease