Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Medication non-adherence is associated with greater morbidity and mortality in chronic disease, and has been estimated to increase healthcare costs by over $170 billion annually in the United States.1 Medication adherence is challenging for patients across the spectrum of medical disorders that are treated with long-term use of oral medications. Poor medication adherence can result in increased risk of complications, disease progression, increased healthcare utilization and poor therapeutic outcomes.2 Adherence is typically tracked using measures based on pharmacy fill data such as the medication possession ratio (MPR) and/or proportion of days covered (PDC).3 Although MPR and PDC are associated with a higher likelihood of using medication as prescribed at the population level, when compared to direct assessments or patient reports, they are not accurate enough for making individual management decisions and likely to underestimate non-adherence.4 However, real-time documentation methods using direct video observation are expensive and cumbersome for patients and providers.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most prevalent gastrointestinal conditions in the United States, affecting an estimated 20-30% of the adult population.5 Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the cornerstone of pharmacologic management for GERD forming the standard of care for erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and symptomatic non-erosive reflux disease.6 Despite their established efficacy, suboptimal medication adherence remains a significant clinical barrier: estimates of PPI adherence in real-world populations range from 50-70% at one year7, with non-adherence associated with symptom recurrence, mucosal injury, and increased healthcare utilization.8 FORTISKAPâ„¢ (Cosmos Rx, Inc.) is a digital adherence monitoring device consisting of a sensor-embedded cap that attaches to standard prescription medication bottles. The device records the date and time of each bottle opening event and transmits this data wirelessly to a paired smartphone application, which generates adherence metrics and patient-facing reminders. Prescribers may access aggregated adherence data through a connected provider portal.
The goal of this study is to demonstrate that the Fortiskapâ„¢ prescription bottle-top, medication adherence device results in a higher detection rate of medication non-adherence compared to pharmacy fill-data assessment and/or compared to ARMS adherence self-assessment.
4.1 Background and Rationale Medication non-adherence is associated with greater morbidity and mortality in chronic disease, and has been estimated to increase healthcare costs by over $170 billion annually in the United States.1 Medication adherence is challenging for patients across the spectrum of medical disorders that are treated with long-term use of oral medications. Poor medication adherence can result in increased risk of complications, disease progression, increased healthcare utilization and poor therapeutic outcomes.2 Adherence is typically tracked using measures based on pharmacy fill data such as the medication possession ratio (MPR) and/or proportion of days covered (PDC).3 Although MPR and PDC are associated with a higher likelihood of using medication as prescribed at the population level, when compared to direct assessments or patient reports, they are not accurate enough for making individual management decisions and likely to underestimate non-adherence.4 However, real-time documentation methods using direct video observation are expensive and cumbersome for patients and providers.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is among the most prevalent gastrointestinal conditions in the United States, affecting an estimated 20-30% of the adult population.5 Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the cornerstone of pharmacologic management for GERD forming the standard of care for erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus, and symptomatic non-erosive reflux disease.6 Despite their established efficacy, suboptimal medication adherence remains a significant clinical barrier: estimates of PPI adherence in real-world populations range from 50-70% at one year7, with non-adherence associated with symptom recurrence, mucosal injury, and increased healthcare utilization.8 FORTISKAPâ„¢ (Cosmos Rx, Inc.) is a digital adherence monitoring device consisting of a sensor-embedded cap that attaches to standard prescription medication bottles. The device records the date and time of each bottle opening event and transmits this data wirelessly to a paired smartphone application, which generates adherence metrics and patient-facing reminders. Prescribers may access aggregated adherence data through a connected provider portal.
The goal of this study is to demonstrate that the Fortiskapâ„¢ prescription bottle-top, medication adherence device results in a higher detection rate of medication non-adherence compared to pharmacy fill-data assessment and/or compared to ARMS adherence self-assessment.
4.2 Study Objectives
Primary outcomes:
Secondary Outcomes:
Human Factor Outcomes:
4.4 Study Duration Individual subject participation 90 days from enrollment (Day 0) through the Day 90 closeout visit. Total study timeline: Approximately 270 days (~9 months), accounting for a rolling enrollment period of up to 180 days followed by the 90-day follow-up window for the last enrolled subject. (for details of recruitment plans, see section 6).
4.5 Statistical Approach The primary statistical analysis will compare paired adherence measurements within the same subject across the three measurement modalities. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test (non-parametric, within-subject, two-tailed, α = 0.05) will be used as the primary test for the FORTISKAP™ vs. PDC comparison and the FORTISKAP™ vs. ARMS comparison. This non-parametric test is chosen given modest sample size and expected non-normal distribution of adherence scores.
Adherence will be expressed as a continuous percentage (0-100%) for FORTISKAP™ and PDC comparisons. ARMS total score (range 12-48) will be treated as a continuous variable for the FORTISKAP™ vs. ARMS comparison; scores ≥ 16 will additionally be classified as indicating non-adherence for categorical analyses.
Agreement between modalities will be further assessed using Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Categorical concordance (adherent vs. non-adherent) across methods will be reported using Cohen's kappa.
Secondary outcomes will be summarized descriptively. PUASQ scores will be reported by timepoint (Day 7, 30, 90) with mean, standard deviation, and range.
4.6 Sample Size A formal sample size calculation was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test under the following assumptions: two-tailed α = 0.05; power = 0.80; expected medium effect size (r = 0.3) representing a clinically meaningful difference between adherence measurement modalities, based on analogous studies comparing electronic monitoring to pharmacy fill data in chronic disease populations.
Under these assumptions, a minimum of 37 evaluable subjects is required. To account for an estimated 10-15% dropout and data incompleteness rate over the 90-day follow-up, a target enrollment of 45 subjects (evaluable target: 40) is established. A sensitivity analysis will be conducted including all subjects with at least 30 days of FORTISKAPâ„¢ data.
4.7 Stopping Rules
The study may be stopped early if:
The Site PI makes the final determination if study termination is warranted. SECTION 5: SUBJECT POPULATION, INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA, AND VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 5.1 Target Population Adult patients (≥ 18 years of age) presenting to TidalHealth Gastroenterology Clinic with a confirmed diagnosis of GERD who are currently prescribed a once-daily oral PPI.
5.2 Inclusion Criteria
5.3 Exclusion Criteria
Prisoners / Incarcerated Individuals: Incarcerated individuals are excluded. Children / Minors: Minors (< 18 years) are excluded. Cognitively Impaired Individuals: Individuals with documented cognitive impairment that would prevent meaningful study participation are excluded.
Economically or Educationally Disadvantaged Subjects: No subjects are targeted based on economic or educational status. The compensation offered ($175 maximum) is not considered coercive given the minimal burden of participation. See Section 11 for compensation details.
SECTION 6: RECRUITMENT METHODS 6.1 Recruitment Strategy
Subjects will be recruited from the existing patient panel of TidalHealth Gastroenterology Clinic by the following methods:
6.1.1 Identification via Epic The Site PI and/or study coordinator will use Epic reporting tools to generate a list of patients with active GERD diagnoses and current PPI prescriptions. This list will be used to identify potentially eligible subjects for outreach. Dr. Canakis; the sole physician enrolling subjects into this study.
6.1.2 Potential Subject Communication Eligible subjects identified through Epic reporting may receive a brief outreach letter or email describing the study and inviting them to contact the study coordinator. A template for this communication is included in Appendix 6. Outreach communications will be sent through TidalHealth's secure patient messaging infrastructure (MyChart) or by US mail. No unsolicited phone contact will be attempted.
6.1.3 Point-of-Care Recruitment The study coordinator will identify potentially eligible subjects at the time of a scheduled gastroenterology clinic appointment. The coordinator will introduce the study to interested patients, provide a study information sheet, and schedule a separate enrollment visit or, if the subject prefers, complete enrollment and consent at the same visit.
SECTION 7: INFORMED CONSENT PROCESS 7.1 Consenting study personnel Informed consent will be obtained by the study coordinator, or the Site PI. 7.2 Consent Process
Prospective subjects will be approached either at the time of a scheduled clinic visit or in response to a MyChart/mail outreach. The study coordinator will:
Introduce the study and confirm initial interest
Provide the subject with the Informed Consent Form (ICF; Appendix 2) and allow adequate time for review - either immediately or, if the subject prefers, at a separate scheduled visit up to 14 days later
Review the ICF with the subject verbally, covering the study purpose, procedures, risks, benefits, compensation, confidentiality, and voluntary nature of participation
Answer all questions
If the subject decides to participate
Obtain the subject's signature on the ICF
Provide the subject with a signed copy of the ICF 7.3 Documentation of Consent Original Signed ICFs will be maintained in the study binder at TidalHealth. A copy will be scanned and stored electronically. The original signed document will be retained for a minimum of 15 years after study close.
7.4 Capacity and Comprehension The consent process will be conducted in a private setting. The coordinator will assess the subject's ability to understand and voluntarily consent. Subjects who appear not to understand the study, appear under duress, or who have conditions that may impair comprehension will not be enrolled.
7.5 Non-English-Speaking Subjects At present, the ICF is available in English only.
7.6 Re-Consent Subjects will be re-consented if the protocol is amended in a manner that materially affects subject participation, risk, or benefit, or if new information arises that may affect a subject's willingness to continue participation.
SECTION 8: STUDY PROCEDURES 8.1 Overview of Study Timeline The study consists of two in-person visits (Day 0, Day 90) and remote assessment points (Day 7, Day 30), as summarized in Table 1 below. No study-specific clinical procedures, laboratory tests, or imaging are performed. Subjects continue their prescribed PPI regimen without modification throughout the study.
Table 1: Subject study activity matrix Subject Study Day Consent Onboarding Fortiskap Training ARMS PUASQ Compensation Offboarding 0 X X X X $50 7 X X 30 X X $50 90 X X $75 X
Abbreviations: ARMS= Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale, PUASQ=Patient Usability Acceptability and Safety Questionnaire Note: The ARMS will be collected in person or by phone. The PUASQ will be collected simultaneously
Table 2: Study admin activity matrix Study Day Recruitment begins Recruitment ends Prospective data collection ends Epic data extraction Data analysis Data and analysis locked, study closed with IRB
-7 X 90 X 180 X 180-210 X X 270 X 8.2 Day 0 - Enrollment and Onboarding Visit (In-Person, ~60 minutes) Eligibility is confirmed against inclusion/exclusion criteria. Written informed consent is obtained. Baseline demographics, GERD history, current PPI name/dose/frequency, and relevant comorbidities are recorded. The study coordinator installs the FORTISKAPâ„¢ cap on the subject's PPI prescription bottle and activates the device. The FORTISKAPâ„¢ companion application is installed on the subject's smartphone and paired with the device. The study coordinator trains the subject on device use: opening the bottle to take their medication, understanding the app interface, and how to contact the coordinator if a device problem occurs. Baseline self-reported adherence is assessed (ARMS). The subject's PPI prescription is confirmed to be filled at - or in the process of being transferred to - TidalHealth Community Pharmacy.
8.3 Day 7 - Remote Check-in The study coordinator contacts the subject by phone or secure message to confirm device function and address any technical issues. The ARMS questionnaire (Appendix 3) and the PUASQ questionnaire are confirmed completed by the subject or completed with the help of the study coordinator.
8.4 Day 30 - Remote Assessment The study coordinator contacts the subject by phone or secure message to confirm device function and address any technical issues. The ARMS questionnaire (Appendix 3) and the PUASQ questionnaire (Appendix 4) are confirmed completed by the subject or completed with the help of the study coordinator.
8.5 Day 90 - Closeout Visit (In-Person, ~45 minutes) 8.5.1 Subject attends in-person closeout visit. The ARMS and PUASQ questionnaires are administered for the final time. The FORTISKAPâ„¢ device is collected from the subject.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortiskap group | Experimental | subjects using the Fortiskap device to monitor medication adherence |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fortiskap | Device | The Fortiskap bottle-top medication monitor is fingerpring access controlled, records bottle opening and estimates the number of pills left in the bottle after each event. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Fortiskap vs. PDC adherence | Comparison of medication adherence between Fortiskapâ„¢ tracking of prescription bottle opening and pharmacy fill data: The study measure is defined as the proportion of study days with at least one recorded medication removal event ("Fortiskap adherence rate") compared with the Proportion of Days Covered(PDC): the number of days during which pharmacy fill records demonstrate medication available divided by the number of study days. The primary comparison is a within subject paired analysis of continuous variables. | 90 days |
| Fortiskap vs. ARMS adherence comparison | Comparison of medication adherence between Fortiskapâ„¢ tracking of prescription bottle opening and a validated adherence self-reporting tool: The study measure is defined as the proportion of study days with at least one recorded medication removal event ("Fortiskap adherence rate") compared with vs. Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) adherence self-reporting instrument.9 The primary comparison is a within subject paired analysis of the industry-standard dichotomous outcomes of 80% for daily medication consumption and >=16 for the ARMS. | 90 days |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 21 years at time of enrollment Confirmed diagnosis of GERD and/or erosive esophagitis documented in the Epic medical record (ICD-10 code K21.0 or K21.9) Currently prescribed a once-daily oral PPI (omeprazole, esomeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, or dexlansoprazole) for a minimum of 30 days prior to enrollment Willing and able to fill PPI prescription exclusively at TidalHealth Community Pharmacy for the 90-day study period Owns a smartphone (iOS or Android) capable of running the FORTISKAP™ companion application Able to participate in the study enrollment and ongoing requirements in English.
Exclusion Criteria:
Current diagnosis of active esophageal malignancy, gastric malignancy, or other upper gastrointestinal malignancy requiring active systemic treatment Cognitive impairment, dementia, or other neurological condition that, in the judgment of the Site PI, would prevent proper use of the FORTISKAPâ„¢ device or completion of self-report questionnaires Institutionalized subjects (nursing home, assisted living, correctional facility) or subjects whose medications are managed by a caregiver who would need to operate the device on their behalf Life expectancy < 6 months in the judgment of the treating physician
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abraham N Morse, MD, MBA | Contact | 3027946587 | nick@cosmosrx.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Abraham N Morse, MD, MBA | Cosmos Rx, Inc | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tidal Health | Salisbury | Maryland | 21801 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28301676 | Background | Boghossian TA, Rashid FJ, Thompson W, Welch V, Moayyedi P, Rojas-Fernandez C, Pottie K, Farrell B. Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 16;3(3):CD011969. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011969.pub2. | |
| 33351048 | Background | Maret-Ouda J, Markar SR, Lagergren J. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Dec 22;324(24):2536-2547. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21360. |
Not provided
Not provided
depends on the identity and intent of the requestor
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005764 | Gastroesophageal Reflux |
| D055118 | Medication Adherence |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015154 | Esophageal Motility Disorders |
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 36170502 | Background | Fass R. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 29;387(13):1207-1216. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp2114026. No abstract available. |
| 38320955 | Background | Wickham ME, McGrail KM, Law MR, Cragg A, Hohl CM. Validating methods used to identify non-adherence adverse drug events in Canadian administrative health data. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024 May;90(5):1240-1246. doi: 10.1111/bcp.16014. Epub 2024 Feb 6. |
| 32857646 | Background | Alhazami M, Pontinha VM, Patterson JA, Holdford DA. Medication Adherence Trajectories: A Systematic Literature Review. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Sep;26(9):1138-1152. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.9.1138. |
| 34380627 | Background | Simon ST, Kini V, Levy AE, Ho PM. Medication adherence in cardiovascular medicine. BMJ. 2021 Aug 11;374:n1493. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1493. |
| 20131023 | Background | Fischer MA, Stedman MR, Lii J, Vogeli C, Shrank WH, Brookhart MA, Weissman JS. Primary medication non-adherence: analysis of 195,930 electronic prescriptions. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Apr;25(4):284-90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1253-9. Epub 2010 Feb 4. |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |