Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| ASL Città di Torino, Italy | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Head and neck cancer and its surgical treatment may significantly affect patients' psychological well-being, body image, somatic experience, and quality of life. This pilot randomized controlled non-pharmacological study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy of a brief clinical psychological intervention including biofeedback techniques in reducing post-traumatic stress symptoms in patients undergoing demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.
Secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of the intervention on somatopsychic distress and quality of life, assess the persistence of intervention effects over time, and examine the impact of flap reconstruction on patients' psychological outcomes and quality of life.
Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving two 60-minute clinical psychological sessions integrating biofeedback techniques or a control group receiving standard care without the study intervention. Psychological and clinical assessments will be performed at baseline (before surgery), at hospital admission for surgery, and at the post-discharge follow-up visit.
BACKGROUND Head and neck cancer encompasses oncological conditions that can develop in several anatomical sites, including the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, and salivary glands. In particular, oral cavity cancer, including cancers of the lips, tongue, floor of the mouth, cheeks, gums, and palate, is a major cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide and is characterized by facial disfigurement and functional impairment, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 50%. Approximately 35,310 new cases of oral cavity cancer are diagnosed annually in the United States, and approximately 67,000 new cases occur in the European Union. Treatment for head and neck cancer may include demolitive and/or reconstructive surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. These treatments may result in difficulties with eating, swallowing, and speaking, as well as alterations in body image, with significant consequences for patients' psychological well-being and quality of life. The literature highlights the presence of anxiety, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and depressive symptoms among patients with head and neck cancer. Within an integrated care perspective, it is essential to consider how both the oncological disease and its treatments may affect patients' somatopsychic balance and their ability to perceive, communicate, work, and maintain meaningful relationships. In particular, integrating clinical psychological interventions that focus on the somatic and psychological aspects of illness experience and psychophysiological processes may represent a valuable approach.
However, the literature shows a lack of empirically validated psychological interventions specifically targeting patients with head and neck cancer.
PLANNED STUDY This study is a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and feasibility of a brief clinical psychological intervention including biofeedback techniques to reduce post-traumatic stress symptoms and somatopsychic distress in patients undergoing demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction.
OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
ENDPOINTS Primary Endpoint: Mean total score on the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) after surgery.Secondary EndpointsMean total score on the Hyperarousal subscale of the IES-R.Mean total score on the Body Image Scale (BIS).Mean score on the Global Health Status scale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30).Mean scores on the Social Eating, Social Contact, and Less Sexuality scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck (EORTC QLQ-H&N35).Mean total score on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM).
Proportion of participants completing the intervention.Proportion of participants completing all assessments.
DESIGN:
This is a randomized, controlled, non-pharmacological pilot study involving adult patients with head and neck cancer scheduled to undergo demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group. Each participant will receive a unique identification number at the time of randomization. After eligibility confirmation and written informed consent, participants will be stratified according to predefined criteria before randomization. Allocation will be performed using variable block randomization.
Stratification criteria will include:
This approach aims to ensure balance between groups and reduce potential bias. Research staff involved in randomization and delivery of the psychological intervention will be aware of treatment allocation. Outcome assessors and other study personnel will remain blinded to group allocation. Participants will be instructed not to disclose their study group assignment to other patients.
PARTICIPANTS The study will recruit adult patients with head and neck cancer scheduled to undergo demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx, with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction, at the Head and Neck Cancer Unit of ASL Città di Torino, Italy. Each participant will receive the study information sheet and provide written informed consent before enrolment. The study does not modify the medical and surgical treatment planned according to standard clinical practice.
Participation in the study is not compatible with initiation of psychological or psychotherapeutic treatment during the study period. If a need for psychological or psychotherapeutic care emerges during the study, the participant will discontinue participation.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION In 2023, approximately 50 patients underwent demolitive surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx at the Head and Neck Cancer Unit of ASL Città di Torino, including 30 patients without and 20 patients with simultaneous flap reconstruction.Assuming a 15% annual increase in the number of surgical procedures and a clinically relevant difference corresponding to an effect size of 0.5 standard deviations between groups, the estimated sample size is 29 participants per group. With a one-tailed significance level of α=0.15, the study is expected to have 80% statistical power.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BRIEF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL INTERVENTION INCLUDING BIOFEEDBACK TECHNIQUES The intervention consists of two clinical psychological sessions based on a psychoanalytic framework, each lasting approximately 60 minutes, integrating biofeedback techniques. Sessions will be audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. First SessionDuring the first session, the clinician explores the participant's illness history, focusing on the impact of disease-related changes on emotions, thoughts, and interpersonal relationships. Participants are invited to share relevant aspects of their personal history in relation to the experience of illness and treatment.The clinician explores the participant's awareness of the diagnosis, planned surgery, and expected postoperative course, while identifying psychosocial vulnerabilities and resources. Particular attention is given to aspects of body image, identity, and areas of personal investment that may be affected by surgery, as well as preserved resources that may support adaptation.The clinician provides psychoeducation on the relationship between emotional states and bodily responses, explaining how changes in psychophysiological activation may contribute to emotional regulation.A three-minute baseline biofeedback recording is then performed to assess psychophysiological parameters, including respiratory rate, heart rate, heart rate variability, surface electromyography, peripheral temperature, and skin conductance. After psychoeducation on diaphragmatic breathing, the clinician guides the participant in practicing slow and deep breathing with the support of biofeedback monitoring, with the aim of promoting bottom-up self-regulation strategies. At the end of the session, an additional three-minute biofeedback recording is performed. Participants are informed about the usefulness of home practice and are encouraged to perform daily diaphragmatic breathing exercises lasting approximately 10-20 minutes. When possible, participants are encouraged to use the free "Paced Breathing" application to support breathing training with a target of approximately six breathing cycles per minute. Informative material on diaphragmatic breathing is also provided.Second SessionThe second session includes an exploration of thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations that may have emerged following the first session and home practice. Participants undergo a three-minute recording of psychophysiological parameters, followed by a biofeedback session focused on diaphragmatic breathing. The clinician explores any changes in participants' expectations, emotions, and perceptions regarding surgery and postoperative recovery since the first session. At the end of the session, a further three-minute baseline biofeedback recording is performed.
ADMINISTRATION
Assessments will be performed at the following time points:
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
Data analysis will be conducted using SPSS, SAS, and Mplus software.Analyses will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, including all randomized participants according to their assigned group, regardless of adherence to the intervention.Continuous variables will be described using mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range (IQR), depending on data distribution. Categorical variables will be reported as frequencies and percentages.Normality of distributions will be assessed through skewness, kurtosis, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.To compare groups after surgery while accounting for baseline differences, analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models will be performed, with post-surgery outcomes as dependent variables and baseline scores as covariates.The statistical model will include:
STUDY DURATION AND PHASES Total study duration: 24 months.
RISK AND RISK MANAGEMENT The study procedures are not expected to pose risks to participants' physical health. However, participants may experience temporary psychological discomfort when discussing illness-related experiences, emotions, body image, or concerns related to surgery. Participants may also experience discomfort related to the application of biofeedback sensors. Participants will be informed that they may interrupt questionnaires, interviews, or biofeedback sessions at any time to discuss concerns with the clinician. The clinician's clinical training allows them to provide support, address distress, and answer participants' questions.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND DATA PROTECTION Each participant will be assigned a unique alphanumeric identification code.Participant identity and treatment allocation will only be accessible to research personnel involved in randomization and intervention delivery.Outcome assessors and other study personnel will have access only to coded data. Data will be analyzed in pseudonymized form by the Department of Psychology of the University of Torino.Study questionnaires will be stored securely for five years. The study database will be password-protected and accessible only to authorized researchers.All data processing will comply with applicable regulations regarding personal data protection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group | Experimental | Assignment to the experimental and control groups will be performed using block randomization with variable block lengths. The stratification criteria are as follows:
The intervention consists of two clinical-psychological interviews with a psychoanalytic framework, each lasting 60 minutes, integrating biofeedback techniques. Interviews will be recorded and transcribed verbatim. |
|
| Control Group | No Intervention |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brief clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback techniques | Other | Intervention type: Clinical psychological intervention using biofeedback tecniques. The intervention consists of two 60-minute clinical psychological sessions with a psychoanalytic framework. A biofeedback device with physiological sensors is used during the sessions to monitor physiological responses and provide real-time feedback during patients' diaphragmatic breathing. The biofeedback device does not constitute a separate intervention. During the first session, the clinician explores the patient's illness history, emotions, relationships, and experience of diagnosis and surgery. A biofeedback baseline is recorded, followed by diaphragmatic breathing training to support emotional regulation. In the second session, the clinician discusses the patient's experience after training, changes in emotions, and expectations about surgery and recovery. Biofeedback and breathing exercises are repeated. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in post traumatic symptoms after the surgery | Changes in post traumatic symptoms
| T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Body Image after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique | Changes in Body Image Scale (BIS) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique BIS is a self-report questionnaire using a 4-point Likert scale with 10 items designed to assess body image from affective, behavioral, and cognitive perspectives.
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Participants must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Participants will be excluded if they:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonella Granieri, Full Professor | Contact | 3204361389 | +39 | antonella.granieri@unito.it |
| Maria Domenica Sauta, PhD Student | Contact | 3402816558 | +39 | mariadomenica.sauta@unito.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Monica Agnesone, Director, Psychology Unit | ASL Città di Torino | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head and Neck Cancer Unit, Asl Città di Torino | Recruiting | Turin | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24065702 | Background | Fossati A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Borroni S, Maffei C. Reliability and validity of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment. 2013 Dec;20(6):689-708. doi: 10.1177/1073191113504984. Epub 2013 Sep 24. | |
| 22153017 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 25, 2025 |
Not provided
This is a two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled pilot study. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the control group using variable block randomization, with stratification by sex and type of surgery (with or without simultaneous flap reconstruction).
Participants in the intervention group will receive a brief clinical psychological intervention including biofeedback techniques, consisting of two 60-minute sessions. Participants in the control group will receive standard care without the study psychological intervention.
Outcomes will be assessed at three time points: baseline before surgery (T0), hospital admission for surgery (T1), and post-discharge follow-up visit (T2).
Not provided
Not provided
Outcome assessors and research personnel not involved in randomization or intervention delivery will be masked to treatment allocation. Participants will be instructed not to disclose their assigned group.
|
| T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Changes in Quality of life after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique | Changes in Quality of Life ( EORTC QLQ-C30) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique. The EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30) is a standardized questionnaire used to assess quality of life in cancer patients. The questionnaire contains 30 items grouped into: Global Health Status / Quality of Life
Functional Scales
Symptom Scales
Single Symptom Items
Raw scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Functional scales & Global QoL: - Higher score = better functioning / better QoL Symptom scales: - Higher score = worse symptoms | T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Changes in Quality of life of head and neck cancer patients after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique | Changes in Quality of Life of head and neck cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique. The EORTC QLQ-H&N35 is a disease-specific module designed to be used together with the EORTC QLQ-C30 for patients with head and neck cancers. The QLQ-H&N35 contains 35 items, covering symptoms and problems common in head and neck cancer. Multi-item Symptom Scales
Single-item Symptoms
Items use a 4-point Likert scale. For the scoring items are transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher score = more severe symptoms / more problems | T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Changes in psychological distress and therapy outcomes after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique | Changes in psychological distress and therapy outcomes (CORE-OM) after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique. The CORE-OM is a widely used self-report questionnaire designed to measure psychological distress and therapy outcomes. It is commonly used in counseling services, clinical psychology, psychotherapy research, and mental health settings. CORE-OM assesses global psychological distress across four main domains:
Items are averaged to produce:
| T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Changes in mentalization after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique | Changes in mentalization (MZQ) after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique. The Mentalization Questionnaire (MZQ) is a self-report on 5-point Likert scale (e.g., 0 = strongly disagree to 4 = strongly agree) designed to assess a person's capacity for mentalizing - that is, the ability to understand one's own and others' thoughts, feelings, intentions, and mental states. The MZQ evaluates impairments in mentalizing across several domains:
| T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Changes in maladaptive personality traits after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique | Changes in in maladaptive personality traits (PID-5-BF) scores after a specific brief clinical-psychological intervention, including biofeedback technique. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 - Brief Form (PID-5-BF) is 25 items self-report questionnaire developed to assess maladaptive personality traits described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5). The PID-5-BF evaluates five broad personality trait domains (5 items per trait domain):
Rated on a 4-point scale: 0 = Very False or Often False
Higher scores indicate stronger expression of maladaptive traits. | T0: Baseline T1: Before surgery T2: Follow-up visit within one month after surgery |
| Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. 2012 Sep;42(9):1879-90. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002674. Epub 2011 Dec 8. |
| 34694942 | Background | Raimondi G, Samela T, Lester D, Imperatori C, Carlucci L, Contardi A, Balsamo M, Innamorati M. Psychometric Properties of the Italian Mentalization Questionnaire: Assessing Structural Invariance and Construct Validity. J Pers Assess. 2022 Sep-Oct;104(5):628-636. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1991362. Epub 2021 Oct 25. |
| 22867004 | Background | Hausberg MC, Schulz H, Piegler T, Happach CG, Klopper M, Brutt AL, Sammet I, Andreas S. Is a self-rated instrument appropriate to assess mentalization in patients with mental disorders? Development and first validation of the mentalization questionnaire (MZQ). Psychother Res. 2012;22(6):699-709. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2012.709325. Epub 2012 Aug 6. |
| 19701881 | Background | Palmieri G, Evans C, Hansen V, Brancaleoni G, Ferrari S, Porcelli P, Reitano F, Rigatelli M. Validation of the Italian version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Clin Psychol Psychother. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):444-9. doi: 10.1002/cpp.646. |
| 11772852 | Background | Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Margison F, McGrath G, Mellor-Clark J, Audin K. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Jan;180:51-60. doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.1.51. |
| 7818919 | Background | Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tollesson E, Jensen AB, Razavi D, Maher EJ, Kaasa S. Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group. Acta Oncol. 1994;33(8):879-85. doi: 10.3109/02841869409098450. |
| 11401047 | Background | Zotti P, Lugli D, Vaccher E, Vidotto G, Franchin G, Barzan L. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire-head and neck 35 in Italian laryngectomized patients. European organization for research and treatment of cancer. Qual Life Res. 2000;9(10):1147-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1016674507150. |
| 8433390 | Background | Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. |
| 11166145 | Background | Hopwood P, Fletcher I, Lee A, Al Ghazal S. A body image scale for use with cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2001 Jan;37(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00353-1. |
| 24092980 | Background | Craparo G, Faraci P, Rotondo G, Gori A. The Impact of Event Scale - Revised: psychometric properties of the Italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1427-32. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S51793. Epub 2013 Sep 19. |
| 36498377 | Background | Van Hof KS, Hoesseini A, Dorr MC, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Jansen F, Leemans CR, Takes RP, Terhaard CHJ, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Sewnaik A, Offerman MPJ. Caregiver Burden, Psychological Distress and Quality of Life among Informal Caregivers of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;19(23):16304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316304. |
| 35732291 | Background | Tranby EP, Heaton LJ, Tomar SL, Kelly AL, Fager GL, Backley M, Frantsve-Hawley J. Oral Cancer Prevalence, Mortality, and Costs in Medicaid and Commercial Insurance Claims Data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Sep 2;31(9):1849-1857. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0114. |
| 37051506 | Background | Tang Y, Hua Y, Huang X, Cao Y, Sun X. Psychological Burden of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy and Their Family Caregivers: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2023 Apr 5;16:927-935. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S398064. eCollection 2023. |
| 28666771 | Background | Studer RK, Danuser B, Gomez P. Physicians' psychophysiological stress reaction in medical communication of bad news: A critical literature review. Int J Psychophysiol. 2017 Oct;120:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 27. |
| 32027385 | Background | Scherl C, Kauffels J, Schutzenberger A, Dollinger M, Bohr C, Durr S, Fietkau R, Haderlein M, Koch M, Traxdorf M, Mantsopoulos K, Muller S, Iro H. Secondary Tracheoesophageal Puncture After Laryngectomy Increases Complications With Shunt and Voice Prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E865-E873. doi: 10.1002/lary.28517. Epub 2020 Feb 6. |
| 26923487 | Background | Salturk Z, Arslanoglu A, Ozdemir E, Yildirim G, Aydogdu I, Kumral TL, Berkiten G, Atar Y, Uyar Y. How do voice restoration methods affect the psychological status of patients after total laryngectomy? HNO. 2016 Mar;64(3):163-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-016-0134-x. |
| 36135096 | Background | Mascarella MA, Morand GB, Hier MP, Mlynarek A, Albert JG, Kissane D, Henry M. Dealing with the Vicissitudes and Abject Consequences of Head and Neck Cancer: A Vital Role for Psycho-Oncology. Curr Oncol. 2022 Sep 19;29(9):6714-6723. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29090527. |
| 19606075 | Background | Lydiatt WM, Moran J, Burke WJ. A review of depression in the head and neck cancer patient. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2009 Jun;7(6):397-403. |
| 21369722 | Background | Luckett T, Britton B, Clover K, Rankin NM. Evidence for interventions to improve psychological outcomes in people with head and neck cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jul;19(7):871-81. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1119-7. Epub 2011 Mar 4. |
| 23042612 | Background | Kangas M, Milross C, Taylor A, Bryant RA. A pilot randomized controlled trial of a brief early intervention for reducing posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depressive symptoms in newly diagnosed head and neck cancer patients. Psychooncology. 2013 Jul;22(7):1665-73. doi: 10.1002/pon.3208. Epub 2012 Oct 8. |
| 15796646 | Background | Kangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA. The relationship between acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005 Apr;73(2):360-4. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.2.360. |
| 34670507 | Background | Kassir ZM, Li J, Harrison C, Johnson JT, Nilsen ML. Disparity of perception of quality of life between head and neck cancer patients and caregivers. BMC Cancer. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08865-7. |
| 29916421 | Background | Granieri A, Borgogno FV, Franzoi IG, Gonella M, Guglielmucci F. Development of a Brief Psychoanalytic Group therapy (BPG) and its application in an asbestos national priority contaminated site. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2018 Apr-Jun;54(2):160-166. doi: 10.4415/ANN_18_02_12. |
| 33840565 | Background | Graillon N, Iocca O, Carey RM, Benjamin K, Cannady SB, Hartner L, Newman JG, Rajasekaran K, Brant JA, Shanti RM. What has the National Cancer Database taught us about oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jan;51(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Apr 8. |
| 21706673 | Background | Fingeret MC, Yuan Y, Urbauer D, Weston J, Nipomnick S, Weber R. The nature and extent of body image concerns among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer. Psychooncology. 2012 Aug;21(8):836-44. doi: 10.1002/pon.1990. Epub 2011 Jun 27. |
| 31454796 | Background | Dragicevic D, Jovic RM, Kljajic V, Vlaski L, Savovic S. Comparison of Voice Handicap Index in Patients with Esophageal and Tracheoesophageal Speech after Total Laryngectomy. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2020;72(5):363-369. doi: 10.1159/000502091. Epub 2019 Aug 27. |
| 32358782 | Background | Burch JB, Ginsberg JP, McLain AC, Franco R, Stokes S, Susko K, Hendry W, Crowley E, Christ A, Hanna J, Anderson A, Hebert JR, O'Rourke MA. Symptom Management Among Cancer Survivors: Randomized Pilot Intervention Trial of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Jun;45(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09462-3. |
| Jun 23, 2026 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided