Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16000-SAFarrell | Registry Identifier | Sterling IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new handle design for the uresta pessary works better than the current handle design for women when they are using the pessary. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is the new pessary equally effective for users. Do pessary users find the new handle design is more or less helpful for insertion and removal of the pessary Is the optional removal string, provided with the new handle, helpful in pessary handling.
The participants will use both the original and the new uresta pessary handle designs and complete a questionnaire to rate both handles.
The score for the two questionnaires will be compared to determine which handle is best.
The efficacy, safety and usability of the use of the uresta pessary for the treatment of bladder leaking has been extensively investigated and the results published1-5 Post-market surveillance has identified potential improvements related to the device. User feedback suggested possible modifications including adding a finger hole to the handle, increasing handle stiffness, and providing an optional removal string to help locate the device during removal.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| pessary handle comparison arm | Other | single arm, sequential use of two pessary handle designs |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pessary handle | Device | the participants will use two pessary handle designs as well as an optional pessary puller string and complete questionnaires to rate their experience |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| questionnaire | A 15 item questionnaire in which each question is anwered on a 5-point likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree"=1 to strongly agree = 5. The higher the score the better the usability and efficacy | From enrolment to completion at 4 weeks |
| Paired samples t-test | The scores of each questionnaire will be summed and the mean scores on the pessary handle questionnaires will be compared using a paired samples t-test with a p<0.05 considered significant | from enrollment to completion at 4 weeks |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Scott Farrell, MD | Dalhousie University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stirling IRB | Atlanta | Georgia | 30339 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17466709 | Background | Farrell SA, Baydock S, Amir B, Fanning C. Effectiveness of a new self-positioning pessary for the management of urinary incontinence in women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):474.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.038. | |
| 27438055 | Background | Lovatsis D, Best C, Diamond P. Short-term Uresta efficacy (SURE) study: a randomized controlled trial of the Uresta continence device. Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):147-150. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3090-9. Epub 2016 Jul 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Yes
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014550 | Urinary Incontinence, Stress |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014549 | Urinary Incontinence |
| D014555 | Urination Disorders |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
single cohort, sequential use study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 35624166 | Background | Campbell P, Moran K, Boyle S, Gallagher C. Compliance with Uresta (CURE) study; a 12 month follow-up of 40 women. Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Mar;34(3):737-744. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05234-1. Epub 2022 May 27. |
| 40902949 | Background | Farrell SA, Gillespie K, Foulem S, Lagace S. A Self-Selection Validation Study of the Uresta Bladder Support. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2025 Nov;47(11):103085. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2025.103085. Epub 2025 Sep 1. |
| D005261 |
| Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D059411 | Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms |
| D020924 | Urological Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |