Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system. Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are a subtype of chronic active MS lesions showing an iron-laden inflammatory rim on susceptibility-sensitive MRI. PRLs mark a more aggressive disease course and have recently been incorporated, together with the central vein sign, into the updated diagnostic criteria for MS. Before PRLs can be used reliably in multicenter clinical practice and trials, the way they are identified must be shown to be consistent across different centers, raters, and scanners. This is a retrospective, multicenter, observational validation study. Using previously acquired 3-Tesla brain MRI scans from MS patients across 15 MAGNIMS centers, expert raters count PRLs according to the NAIMS consensus definitions. The study measures how consistently PRLs are identified between centers, raters, and scanners (inter-rater, inter-center, and inter-scanner agreement), using statistical methods such as the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. Where systematic sources of disagreement are found, the PRL definitions are refined through a structured Delphi consensus process and re-tested on an independent set of scans. The goal is to standardize PRL identification and provide an evidence-based basis for consistent, reproducible PRL assessment to support future multicenter studies. No new patients are recruited and no new scans or biological samples are collected; only pre-existing, de-identified imaging and clinical data are used.
Design: Retrospective, multicenter, observational validation study coordinated by IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (Milan, Italy) within the MAGNIMS network.
Data source: A pool of previously acquired 3T brain MRI scans fulfilling NAIMS-PRL acquisition criteria (3D-FLAIR, SWI, post-gadolinium 2D/3D T1-weighted; submillimeter in-plane resolution) is available across 15 MAGNIMS centers. A preliminary survey identified 1402 eligible scans. To participate in the study, each MAGNIMS center is required to contribute scans from a minimum of 30 patients and to have at least one expert rater with clinical or research experience in PRL evaluation. From this pool, two selected datasets of 150 scans each, corresponding to 10 randomly selected scans per center per scanner, are drawn for evaluation. The selected datasets are balanced across MS phenotype, age, and lesion load.
Evaluation procedure: Phase 1 - First evaluation: Selected Dataset 1 is rated for PRLs by at least one expert rater from each participating MAGNIMS center, applying the NAIMS-PRL criteria. Inter-rater, inter-center, and intra-center reproducibility of PRL counts is assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis by the coordinating center together with the Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna. Phase 2 - Disagreement analysis: Sources of disagreement between expert raters are identified at the level of individual PRL designations on the MRI images. Phase 3 - Refinement and Delphi consensus: If consistent sources of disagreement are identified, proposed refinements to the PRL definitions are translated into operationalized consensus statements and ratified through an electronic Delphi survey using a 5-point Likert scale. Consensus requires at least 75% agreement, with a minimum 80% response rate per round. Phase 4 - Second evaluation: The refined criteria are re-tested on Selected Dataset 2 by the same expert raters, with repeated ICC and Bland-Altman analysis. If excellent reproducibility, defined as ICC ≥0.90, is reached, the process is complete; otherwise, Phases 2 to 4 are repeated.
Clinical correlations: Mandatory clinical data, including demographics, MS phenotype, EDSS, and disease duration, and, where available, optional measures, including Timed 25-Foot Walk and 9-Hole Peg Test, are integrated to explore associations between PRL burden and clinical disability.
Data handling: All imaging and clinical data are de-identified, either anonymized or, where agreed in the Data Transfer Agreement, pseudonymized, before transfer to the coordinating center. MRI data in NIfTI format undergo defacing using fsl_deface from the FMRIB Software Library. No new recruitment, MRI scans, biological samples, or study-specific interventions are performed. Retrospective data acquired between January 2017 and November 2025 are used.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS patients with pre-acquired 3T MRI scans | Retrospective cohort of adult patients with confirmed Multiple Sclerosis according to the revised 2017 McDonald Criteria, with pre-acquired 3T MRI scans fulfilling NAIMS-PRL criteria and corresponding demographic and clinical data available for research use. No new patient recruitment, MRI scans, or study-specific interventions will be performed. MRI data will be retrospectively assessed for paramagnetic rim lesions to evaluate the reliability and consistency of PRL identification across MAGNIMS centers, raters, and scanners. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rated number of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) per MRI scan and per rater | Number of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) identified on each pre-acquired 3T MRI scan by each rater, according to NAIMS-PRL criteria, to evaluate the consistency and reliability of PRL identification across MAGNIMS centers, raters, and scanners. | Baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between PRL burden and clinical characteristics | Assessment of potential correlations between paramagnetic rim lesion (PRL) burden and clinical characteristics, including Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), MS phenotype, disease duration, and, if available, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW) and 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT). | Baseline |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients with confirmed Multiple Sclerosis according to the revised 2017 McDonald Criteria, with previously acquired 3T MRI scans fulfilling NAIMS-PRL criteria and corresponding demographic and clinical data available for retrospective PRL assessment. No new patient recruitment, additional MRI scans, or study-specific interventions will be performed.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical University Graz | Graz | 8036 | Austria | |||
| Medical University of Vienna |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39711984 | Background | Dal-Bianco A, Oh J, Sati P, Absinta M. Chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: classification, terminology, and clinical significance. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Dec 19;17:17562864241306684. doi: 10.1177/17562864241306684. eCollection 2024. | |
| 20398859 | Background | Koch-Henriksen N, Sorensen PS. The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology. Lancet Neurol. 2010 May;9(5):520-32. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70064-8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Individual participant-level data will not be made publicly available. The study involves the transfer and analysis of anonymized or pseudonymized demographic, clinical, and MRI data, according to the applicable Data Transfer Agreements, for the specific purposes of the MAGNIMS PRL validation study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Vienna |
| 1090 |
| Austria |
| Charles University and General University Hospital | Prague | 128 00 | Czechia |
| Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance | Copenhagen | 2650 | Denmark |
| University Medical Center Mainz | Homburg | 66424 | Germany |
| IRCCS San Raffaele | Milan | 20132 | Italy |
| University Hospital of Padua | Padova | 35128 | Italy |
| University of Verona | Verona | 37129 | Italy |
| Amsterdam UMC | Amsterdam | 1105 | Netherlands |
| Oslo | 0372 | Norway |
| Vall d'Hebron University Hospital | Barcelona | 08035 | Spain |
| Karolinska Neuroimmunology & Multiple Sclerosis (KNIMS) Centre | Stockholm | 171 77 | Sweden |
| University Hospital Basel | Basel | 4031 | Switzerland |
| UCL Institute of Neurology | London | WC1N 3BG | United Kingdom |
| University of Oxford | Oxford | OX1 2JD | United Kingdom |
| 32511687 | Background | Kappos L, Wolinsky JS, Giovannoni G, Arnold DL, Wang Q, Bernasconi C, Model F, Koendgen H, Manfrini M, Belachew S, Hauser SL. Contribution of Relapse-Independent Progression vs Relapse-Associated Worsening to Overall Confirmed Disability Accumulation in Typical Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis in a Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Sep 1;77(9):1132-1140. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1568. |
| 36534392 | Background | Tur C, Carbonell-Mirabent P, Cobo-Calvo A, Otero-Romero S, Arrambide G, Midaglia L, Castillo J, Vidal-Jordana A, Rodriguez-Acevedo B, Zabalza A, Galan I, Nos C, Salerno A, Auger C, Pareto D, Comabella M, Rio J, Sastre-Garriga J, Rovira A, Tintore M, Montalban X. Association of Early Progression Independent of Relapse Activity With Long-term Disability After a First Demyelinating Event in Multiple Sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2023 Feb 1;80(2):151-160. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.4655. |
| 38165377 | Background | Cagol A, Benkert P, Melie-Garcia L, Schaedelin SA, Leber S, Tsagkas C, Barakovic M, Galbusera R, Lu PJ, Weigel M, Ruberte E, Radue EW, Yaldizli O, Oechtering J, Lorscheider J, D'Souza M, Fischer-Barnicol B, Muller S, Achtnichts L, Vehoff J, Disanto G, Findling O, Chan A, Salmen A, Pot C, Bridel C, Zecca C, Derfuss T, Lieb JM, Remonda L, Wagner F, Vargas MI, Du Pasquier RA, Lalive PH, Pravata E, Weber J, Cattin PC, Absinta M, Gobbi C, Leppert D, Kappos L, Kuhle J, Granziera C. Association of Spinal Cord Atrophy and Brain Paramagnetic Rim Lesions With Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in People With MS. Neurology. 2024 Jan 9;102(1):e207768. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207768. Epub 2023 Dec 13. |
| 33484118 | Background | Dal-Bianco A, Grabner G, Kronnerwetter C, Weber M, Kornek B, Kasprian G, Berger T, Leutmezer F, Rommer PS, Trattnig S, Lassmann H, Hametner S. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions in 7 T MRI. Brain. 2021 Apr 12;144(3):833-847. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa436. |
| 27796537 | Background | Dal-Bianco A, Grabner G, Kronnerwetter C, Weber M, Hoftberger R, Berger T, Auff E, Leutmezer F, Trattnig S, Lassmann H, Bagnato F, Hametner S. Slow expansion of multiple sclerosis iron rim lesions: pathology and 7 T magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neuropathol. 2017 Jan;133(1):25-42. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1636-z. Epub 2016 Oct 27. |
| 27270171 | Background | Absinta M, Sati P, Schindler M, Leibovitch EC, Ohayon J, Wu T, Meani A, Filippi M, Jacobson S, Cortese IC, Reich DS. Persistent 7-tesla phase rim predicts poor outcome in new multiple sclerosis patient lesions. J Clin Invest. 2016 Jul 1;126(7):2597-609. doi: 10.1172/JCI86198. Epub 2016 Jun 6. |
| 31403674 | Background | Absinta M, Sati P, Masuzzo F, Nair G, Sethi V, Kolb H, Ohayon J, Wu T, Cortese ICM, Reich DS. Association of Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis Lesions With Disability In Vivo. JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 1;76(12):1474-1483. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.2399. |
| 36515487 | Background | Calvi A, Clarke MA, Prados F, Chard D, Ciccarelli O, Alberich M, Pareto D, Rodriguez Barranco M, Sastre-Garriga J, Tur C, Rovira A, Barkhof F. Relationship between paramagnetic rim lesions and slowly expanding lesions in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2023 Mar;29(3):352-362. doi: 10.1177/13524585221141964. Epub 2022 Dec 14. |
| 32819894 | Background | Elliott C, Arnold DL, Chen H, Ke C, Zhu L, Chang I, Cahir-McFarland E, Fisher E, Zhu B, Gheuens S, Scaramozza M, Beynon V, Franchimont N, Bradley DP, Belachew S. Patterning Chronic Active Demyelination in Slowly Expanding/Evolving White Matter MS Lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Sep;41(9):1584-1591. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6742. Epub 2020 Aug 20. |
| 38366920 | Background | Reeves JA, Mohebbi M, Wicks T, Salman F, Bartnik A, Jakimovski D, Bergsland N, Schweser F, Weinstock-Guttman B, Dwyer MG, Zivadinov R. Paramagnetic rim lesions predict greater long-term relapse rates and clinical progression over 10 years. Mult Scler. 2024 Apr;30(4-5):535-545. doi: 10.1177/13524585241229956. Epub 2024 Feb 17. |
| 34495999 | Background | Ng Kee Kwong KC, Mollison D, Meijboom R, York EN, Kampaite A, Thrippleton MJ, Chandran S, Waldman AD. The prevalence of paramagnetic rim lesions in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 Sep 8;16(9):e0256845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256845. eCollection 2021. |
| 34851712 | Background | Hemond CC, Reich DS, Dundamadappa SK. Paramagnetic Rim Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Comparison of Visualization at 1.5-T and 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2022 Jul;219(1):120-131. doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26777. Epub 2021 Dec 1. |
| 38226694 | Background | Bagnato F, Sati P, Hemond CC, Elliott C, Gauthier SA, Harrison DM, Mainero C, Oh J, Pitt D, Shinohara RT, Smith SA, Trapp B, Azevedo CJ, Calabresi PA, Henry RG, Laule C, Ontaneda D, Rooney WD, Sicotte NL, Reich DS, Absinta M. Imaging chronic active lesions in multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement. Brain. 2024 Sep 3;147(9):2913-2933. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae013. |
| 32799417 | Background | Maggi P, Sati P, Nair G, Cortese ICM, Jacobson S, Smith BR, Nath A, Ohayon J, van Pesch V, Perrotta G, Pot C, Theaudin M, Martinelli V, Scotti R, Wu T, Du Pasquier R, Calabresi PA, Filippi M, Reich DS, Absinta M. Paramagnetic Rim Lesions are Specific to Multiple Sclerosis: An International Multicenter 3T MRI Study. Ann Neurol. 2020 Nov;88(5):1034-1042. doi: 10.1002/ana.25877. Epub 2020 Sep 9. |
| 36427168 | Background | Filippi M, Preziosa P, Arnold DL, Barkhof F, Harrison DM, Maggi P, Mainero C, Montalban X, Sechi E, Weinshenker BG, Rocca MA. Present and future of the diagnostic work-up of multiple sclerosis: the imaging perspective. J Neurol. 2023 Mar;270(3):1286-1299. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11488-y. Epub 2022 Nov 24. |
| 40975101 | Background | Montalban X, Lebrun-Frenay C, Oh J, Arrambide G, Moccia M, Pia Amato M, Amezcua L, Banwell B, Bar-Or A, Barkhof F, Butzkueven H, Ciccarelli O, Chataway J, Cohen JA, Comi G, Correale J, Deisenhammer F, Filippi M, Fiol J, Freedman MS, Fujihara K, Granziera C, Green AJ, Hartung HP, Hellwig K, Kappos L, Kimbrough D, Killestein J, Lublin F, Marignier R, Marrie RA, Miller A, Otero-Romero S, Ontaneda D, Ramanathan S, Reich D, Rocca MA, Rovira A, Saidha S, Salter A, Sastre-Garriga J, Saylor D, Solomon AJ, Sormani MP, Stankoff B, Tintore M, Tremlett H, Van der Walt A, Viswanathan S, Wiendl H, Wildemann B, Yamout B, Zaratin P, Calabresi PA, Coetzee T, Thompson AJ. Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2024 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2025 Oct;24(10):850-865. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(25)00270-4. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009103 | Multiple Sclerosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020278 | Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS |
| D020274 | Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D003711 | Demyelinating Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided