Lidocaine Patch vs Intradermal Lidocaine for Epidural Needle Insertion Pain

Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial Evaluating Pain During Epidural Tuohy Needle Insertion After 4% Lidocaine Patch or Intradermal Lidocaine Injection in Parturient Women Requesting Epidural Analgesia

Needle phobia is a barrier for receiving appropriate care during pregnancy and can lead to complications of the mother and fetus that could easily be avoided. Needle phobia can affect routine prenatal care, increase the demand for general anesthesia during c-section, and increase post-op pain. During epidural placement, providers use local anesthetic in various methods to numb the area where the needle will be inserted. Pain from these anesthetic administrations can increase needle phobia and their side effects.

One use of local anesthetic is the lidocaine patch, and studies have shown it is effective in reducing pain level in patients [6, Firmani]. The transdermal lidocaine patch may lower the physical pain and mental effects of needle phobia in pregnant women and lower the side effects from that. Although lidocaine patch may take more time to numb the skin, a high number of expecting mothers will not require an epidural for labor analgesia right away. Therefore, administration of lidocaine patch might be an effective alternative.

Pregnant women needing epidural placement will be randomized into three groups, the lidocaine patch group, intradermal anesthetic group, or use of both to determine the effectiveness of the lidocaine patch compared to the intradermal administration.

Needle phobia is a significant barrier to receiving medical care and may negatively affect prenatal care, obstetric outcomes, and patient experience. During epidural placement for labor analgesia, local anesthetic is commonly administered through intradermal injection to reduce pain from Tuohy needle insertion. However, the injection itself may cause pain and increase anxiety, particularly in patients with needle phobia.

Transdermal lidocaine patches provide a needle-free method of local anesthesia and have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing procedural pain in other clinical settings. This approach may decrease pain and anxiety associated with epidural placement while improving patient comfort.

This prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot study will compare the effectiveness of a 4% lidocaine patch with standard intradermal lidocaine infiltration for reducing pain during epidural Tuohy needle insertion in laboring patients. Participants will be randomized into three groups: intradermal lidocaine alone, lidocaine patch alone, or combined lidocaine patch and intradermal lidocaine. Outcomes will include procedural pain response, vocalization and withdrawal reflex, patient-reported pain scores, hemodynamic changes, and patient satisfaction.

Inclusion Criteria:

Age 18 years or older Parturient women requesting neuraxial anesthesia/analgesia (epidural or combined spinal-epidural) for vaginal or cesarean delivery Ability to provide informed consent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

Less than 30 minutes of lidocaine patch placement prior to epidural placement Administration of opioids within 4 hours before study enrollment Intravenous magnesium sulfate administration within the previous 24 hours Diabetes mellitus (Type 1 or Type 2) Neurocardiogenic signs or symptoms (e.g., dizziness, lightheadedness, bradycardia, or syncope) during intravenous cannulation Cervical dilation greater than 6 cm (if in labor) Spinal anesthesia Chronic pain condition Opioid use disorder Intrauterine fetal demise Prisoner status