Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20240405 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Jordan University of Science and Technology |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluating the influence of single file rotary system for root canal instrumentation using different kinematics on postoperative pain, the primary purpose: measuring post-operative pain by Numerical rating scale in a cohort population treatyed in Jordan Universoit of science and technology post graduate clinics with previously intittaed root canal treatement and could include any of the following: sex/gender, age groups (18-65 ), and healthy volunteers.
The main questions it aims to answer [is/are:
This prospective, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial will evaluate whether the kinematics used during root canal instrumentation with a single-file system influence postoperative pain and the local expression of pain-related neuropeptides. The trial will be conducted in adult patients requiring endodontic treatment of mandibular molars. Eligible participants will be enrolled after clinical and radiographic assessment and after obtaining written informed consent.
Participants will be randomly allocated to one of five treatment groups. In all groups, canal shaping will be performed using the same One Curve nickel-titanium single-file system, while the kinematic motion used to activate the file will differ between groups. The tested kinematics will include CanalPro Jeni motion, continuous clockwise rotation, optimum torque reverse motion, forward reciprocating motion, and twisted adaptive motion. This design allows the effect of instrument motion to be assessed while maintaining the same file system across all study arms.
All treatments will be performed under standardized clinical conditions. Local anesthesia will be administered and the tooth will be isolated with a rubber dam. Access cavity preparation, canal identification, manual scouting, working length determination, and radiographic confirmation will be completed using a standardized approach. Initial irrigation will be performed before instrumentation, and the allocated kinematic protocol will then be used for canal preparation according to the study protocol.
Periapical fluid samples will be collected using sterile paper points at predefined procedural time points. The sampling schedule will include collection during the initial stage of canal preparation, after instrumentation, and at the follow-up visit. Samples will be transferred to sterile tubes and stored under appropriate laboratory conditions until analysis. The collected samples will be analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods to quantify selected neuropeptides associated with inflammatory pain response, including substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide.
The clinical treatment will be completed over two visits. At the first visit, the canals will be prepared using the allocated kinematic protocol and irrigated using a standardized irrigation sequence. Intracanal medicament will be placed between visits, and the tooth will be temporized. At the second visit, patient-reported pain and percussion sensitivity will be recorded, the temporary restoration and intracanal medicament will be removed, and periapical fluid will be collected before completion of the final irrigation protocol. The canals will then be dried, obturated using gutta-percha and resin-based sealer, and restored with an adhesive restorative material. A postoperative radiograph will be taken as part of routine treatment documentation.
Postoperative pain will be recorded by the participant at scheduled time points after treatment using a standardized pain scale. Clinical follow-up information and laboratory biomarker data will be collected using structured forms. The trial procedures will be performed by trained clinicians, and laboratory analysis will be performed according to the manufacturers' instructions for the selected assay kits. Data handling and storage will follow institutional requirements for clinical research.
The analysis will compare postoperative pain scores and biomarker levels between the five kinematic groups. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize participant characteristics, pain scores, and biomarker concentrations. Appropriate statistical tests will be selected according to the type and distribution of the data. The analysis will assess whether differences in file kinematics are associated with differences in patient-reported postoperative pain and changes in pain-related neuropeptide levels.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| canal pro Jeni | Active Comparator | motion kinematics by canal pro Jeni |
|
| Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR) | Active Comparator | Motion kinematics by Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR) |
|
| Continuous clockwise rotation (CCR) | Active Comparator | Motion kinematics by Continuous clockwise rotation (CCR) |
|
| Forward reciprocating motion (REC) | Active Comparator | Motion kinematics by Forward reciprocating motion (REC) |
|
| Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA) | Active Comparator | Motion kinematics by Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twisted Adaptive motion (TFA) | Device | motor that is capable of doing the adaptive motion |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative Pain | Pain will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS is a self-reported instrument with scores ranging from a minimum of 0 (no pain) to a maximum of 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicate a worse clinical outcome (more severe pain). | Up to 48 hours post-treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Cytokine Levels | Measurement of cytokine levels in (pg/mL) to evaluate the inflammatory response. Samples are collected immediately before treatment, immediately following treatment on Day 1, and on Day 3 prior to obturation | From baseline up to Day 3 post-treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Taher Mohammed Al Omari, BDS, MSc, JB Endo, M Endo RCSE | Jordan University of Science and Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Aladdin Al Qudah, BDS, MSc, PhD | Jordan University of Science and Technology | Study Chair |
| Lina Elsalem Elsalem, BDS, MSc, PhD | Jordan University of Science and Technology | Study Chair |
| Rami AL Banna, BDS, JB Endo | Jordan University of Science and Technology | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan University of science and technology | Irbid | Northen | 22110 | Jordan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 24. https://whyy.org/segments/reassessing-the-assessment-of-pain-how-the-numeric-scale-became-so-popular-in-health-care | ||
| 29398090 | Background | Gundogdu EC, Arslan H. Effects of Various Cryotherapy Applications on Postoperative Pain in Molar Teeth with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Preliminary Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2018 Mar;44(3):349-354. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.002. Epub 2018 Feb 3. | |
| 36917401 |
Not provided
Not provided
At the publication stage, the IPD will be shared
june 2026 to june 2027
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
biomarker analysis technician
| canal pro jeni | Device | a new kinematics for root canal treatment |
|
| forward reciprocation | Device | endodontic motor with the ability to change reciprocating angles and speed |
|
| continuous rotation | Device | endodontic dental motor |
|
| Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR) | Device | endodontic motor that is designed for rotate in Optimum Torque Reverse (OTR) |
|
| Background |
| Al Omari TMN, La Rosa GRM, Albanna RHI, Tabnjh A, Papale F, Pedulla E. The effect of different kinematics on apical debris extrusion with a single-file system. Odontology. 2023 Oct;111(4):910-915. doi: 10.1007/s10266-023-00802-3. Epub 2023 Mar 14. |
| 34725547 | Background | Pirani C, Iacono F, Zamparini F, Generali L, Prati C. Retreatment of Experimental Carrier-Based Obturators with the Remover NiTi Instrument: Evaluation of Apical Extrusion and Effects of New Kinematics. Int J Dent. 2021 Oct 23;2021:2755680. doi: 10.1155/2021/2755680. eCollection 2021. |
| Background | 19. J Morita Corporation (2016) DentaPort ZX Set OTR brochure. Available at: http://www.jmoritaeurope.de/cms/file s/MO_65827_Update_B_Dentaport_RZ_en.pdf. [Accessed on 3 September 2016] |
| 30113735 | Background | Gambarini G, Piasecki L, Miccoli G, Gaimari G, Di Giorgio R, Di Nardo D, Azim AA, Testarelli L. Classification and cyclic fatigue evaluation of new kinematics for endodontic instruments. Aust Endod J. 2019 Aug;45(2):154-162. doi: 10.1111/aej.12294. Epub 2018 Aug 16. |
| 24862716 | Background | Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, Arslan H, Ertas ET. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals. J Endod. 2014 Jun;40(6):852-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 7. |
| Background | 16. https://www.kerrdental.com/ca/kerr-endodontics/elements-motor-adaptive-motion-shape#docs |
| 31673858 | Background | AlOmari T, AlThobiti G, AlThobaiti S, AlOufi F, Masuadi E, Jamleh A. Incidence of postoperative pain after canal shaping by using Reciproc and Twisted File Adaptive systems: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2445-2450. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03106-5. Epub 2019 Nov 1. |
| 22429241 | Background | Gambarini G, Gergi R, Naaman A, Osta N, Al Sudani D. Cyclic fatigue analysis of twisted file rotary NiTi instruments used in reciprocating motion. Int Endod J. 2012 Sep;45(9):802-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02036.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19. |
| 33064376 | Background | Saricam E, Kayaoglu G. Comparison of OneShape, 2Shape and One Curve endodontic instruments for debris and irrigant extrusion. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jul-Sep;57(3):255-259. doi: 10.17219/dmp/119771. |
| 27185740 | Background | Ahn SY, Kim HC, Kim E. Kinematic Effects of Nickel-Titanium Instruments with Reciprocating or Continuous Rotation Motion: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1009-17. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 13. |
| 25816688 | Background | Caviedes-Bucheli J, Castellanos F, Vasquez N, Ulate E, Munoz HR. The influence of two reciprocating single-file and two rotary-file systems on the apical extrusion of debris and its biological relationship with symptomatic apical periodontitis. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Endod J. 2016 Mar;49(3):255-70. doi: 10.1111/iej.12452. Epub 2015 Apr 22. |
| 32864731 | Background | Yammine SD, Jabbour EA. Apically Extruded Debris following Programmed Over Instrumentation of Curved Canals with Three Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments. Eur J Dent. 2021 Feb;15(1):20-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1714175. Epub 2020 Aug 26. |
| 18570980 | Background | Caviedes-Bucheli J, Munoz HR, Azuero-Holguin MM, Ulate E. Neuropeptides in dental pulp: the silent protagonists. J Endod. 2008 Jul;34(7):773-88. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.010. |
| 38294105 | Background | Caviedes-Bucheli J, Munoz-Alvear HD, Lopez-Moncayo LF, Kacharaju KR, Velasquez-Rivera AC, Carlosama-Recalde LA, Pazmino JC, Gomez-Sosa JF, Diaz-Barrera LE, Munoz HR. Substance P/calcitonin gene-related peptide and their receptors expression in human periodontal ligament after root canal preparation with five different systems. Int Endod J. 2024 May;57(5):576-585. doi: 10.1111/iej.14035. Epub 2024 Jan 31. |
| 26685850 | Background | Relvas JB, Bastos MM, Marques AA, Garrido AD, Sponchiado EC Jr. Assessment of postoperative pain after reciprocating or rotary NiTi instrumentation of root canals: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):1987-1993. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1692-0. Epub 2015 Dec 19. |
| 26174577 | Background | Silva EJ, Carapia MF, Lopes RM, Belladonna FG, Senna PM, Souza EM, De-Deus G. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems. Int Endod J. 2016 Jul;49(7):700-5. doi: 10.1111/iej.12503. Epub 2015 Jul 29. |
| 12017176 | Background | Siqueira JF Jr, Rocas IN, Santos SR, Lima KC, Magalhaes FA, de Uzeda M. Efficacy of instrumentation techniques and irrigation regimens in reducing the bacterial population within root canals. J Endod. 2002 Mar;28(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00004770-200203000-00009. |
| 3868692 | Background | Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. Etiological factors. J Endod. 1985 Nov;11(11):472-8. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80220-X. No abstract available. |
| 21419285 | Background | Pak JG, White SN. Pain prevalence and severity before, during, and after root canal treatment: a systematic review. J Endod. 2011 Apr;37(4):429-38. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.12.016. |
| 26614017 | Background | Kherlakian D, Cunha RS, Ehrhardt IC, Zuolo ML, Kishen A, da Silveira Bueno CE. Comparison of the Incidence of Postoperative Pain after Using 2 Reciprocating Systems and a Continuous Rotary System: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. J Endod. 2016 Feb;42(2):171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 29. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| D010485 | Periapical Periodontitis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D010483 | Periapical Diseases |
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D010510 | Periodontal Diseases |
| D009059 | Mouth Diseases |
| D010518 | Periodontitis |
Not provided
Not provided