Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this longitudinal observational study is to understand the trajectory of Quality of Life (QoL) recovery in women with cervical cancer who have received definitive radiation therapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do functional domains, such as physical, role, and social functioning, show significant and sustained improvement over the 12 months following treatment? How does the burden of treatment-related symptoms, including fatigue, nausea, and cervical cancer-specific symptoms, resolve during the one-year recovery period? Researchers will analyze changes in QoL scores over time to identify which clinical factors-such as time elapsed since treatment and baseline disease stage-serve as the most significant predictors of a patient's overall well-being.
Participants will:
This study investigates the longitudinal recovery trajectory and clinical predictors of Quality of Life (QoL) and vaginal morbidity in patients with cervical cancer following definitive radiation therapy. While combined External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and Intracavitary Radiation Therapy (ICRT/Brachytherapy) are highly effective for cancer control, they frequently lead to long-term physical sequelae, most notably radiation-induced vaginal stenosis and contraction. These changes can significantly impair sexual function and overall patient well-being.
Study Objectives and Design The research utilized a longitudinal design to track a cohort of 67 patients (mean age 51·75 ± 13·23 years) over a 12-month period. The primary objectives were to identify the clinical factors that predict the recovery of functional QoL domains.
Patients were assessed at six distinct time points: baseline (pre-treatment) and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-radiotherapy. QoL was measured using standardized instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30 (general health and functioning) and the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (cervical cancer-specific symptoms).
Clinical Predictors of Recovery
The study identifies several key independent variables that serve as predictors for post-treatment outcomes:
Time Post-Treatment: Time is a highly significant predictor for nearly all QoL domains. Acute symptoms (such as nausea, diarrhea, and fatigue) typically show the most dramatic improvement within the first 1 to 3 months.
Functional Stabilization: Functional domains, including physical and role functioning, show progressive improvement and typically peak and stabilize by the 6-to-12-month mark. Global QoL scores generally reach their highest stable levels (median 83·33) by 6 months post-treatment.
Baseline Clinical Factors: Factors such as clinical stage (with Stage IIIC1 being the most prevalent at 28·79%) and tumor extension to the upper vagina (present in 61·19% of the cohort) influence the starting QoL scores and the overall slope of the recovery curve.
Symptom Resolution and Functional Gains
Longitudinal analysis revealed significant improvements across multiple QoL metrics compared to baseline:
Symptom Burden: Scores for Fatigue, Nausea/Vomiting, and Diarrhea decreased significantly across all follow-up time points (P<0â‹…001).
Functional Domains: Significant gains were sustained in Physical, Role, and Social functioning beginning as early as 1 to 3 months post-treatment.
Cervical Cancer-Specific Symptoms: The specific symptom burden (QLQ-CX24) dropped sharply and remained low throughout the year. Sexual function and vaginal aspect scores showed significant improvements later in the recovery process, specifically between 6 and 12 months.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that while radiation therapy causes significant initial morbidity, the recovery of QoL follows a predictable timeline influenced primarily by time and adherence to vaginal dilator therapy. The dilator acts as a critical intervention to maintain anatomical integrity while the patient's functional roles and energy levels are restored over the first year of survivorship.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life (QoL) | This longitudinal cohort includes 67 women treated for cervical cancer. All participants received definitive External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and Brachytherapy (ICRT). The intervention focuses on the Quality of Life (QoL). Recovery was tracked at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment using EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CX24. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Quality of Life (QoL) Scores | This outcome assesses the longitudinal trajectory of a patient's overall health status, functional abilities, and symptom burden following radiotherapy. Assessment Tools: QoL is measured using two standardized instruments: the EORTC QLQ-C30 (30-item core questionnaire for general cancer patients) and the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (24-item module specific to cervical cancer). Scoring: All scales and single-item measures are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. For the Global Health Status and functional scales (Physical, Role, Social, Emotional, and Cognitive), higher scores represent a higher/better level of functioning. For symptom scales (such as Fatigue, Pain, and Nausea), higher scores represent a higher level of symptom burden or distress. | Data is collected at six specific intervals: Baseline (pre-treatment), and then at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-treatment. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Additionally, the sources define discontinuation criteria for participants who have already entered the study:
Participation in this study is restricted to individuals who self-identify as female.
This eligibility criterion is defined by the study's focus on cervical cancer and the management of post-radiotherapy complications specific to this population, such as vaginal contraction and stenosis. The clinical and demographic data for the study cohort confirm that all 67 participants were women, with assessments covering sex-specific health indicators including pregnancy history, methods of childbirth, and menopausal status. Because the primary objective is to evaluate the impact of a vaginal dilator device on maintaining anatomical integrity and improving quality of life following definitive radiation for cervical cancer, only individuals with the relevant biological and clinical profile are eligible.
Not provided
The study population consists of 67 women. All participants were diagnosed with cervical cancer and had completed definitive radiation therapy, specifically a combination of External Beam Radiation Therapy (EBRT) and Intracavitary Radiation Therapy (ICRT/Brachytherapy). This cohort was followed longitudinally for 12 months post-treatment.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Saengrawee Thanthong, PhD | Chulabhorn Royal Academy | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chulabhorn Hospital, Chulabhorn Royal Academy | Bangkok | 10210 | Thailand |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31238167 | Background | Xu Z, Traughber BJ, Fredman E, Albani D, Ellis RJ, Podder TK. Appropriate Methodology for EBRT and HDR Intracavitary/Interstitial Brachytherapy Dose Composite and Clinical Plan Evaluation for Patients With Cervical Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):e559-e571. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 22. | |
| 41317693 |
Not provided
Not provided
The study does not plan to share individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers. According to the study's formal ethical and data management protocol, all participant information is kept in a secure location (such as a locked cabinet) that is strictly inaccessible to any individuals outside the immediate research team. To further protect participant privacy, all data is converted into anonymized codes during the analysis phase so that no specific individual can be identified from the research results.
Most significantly, the protocol mandates that all information, recordings, and various records must be destroyed immediately upon the completion of the research work. These measures are implemented to ensure the highest level of confidentiality and to comply with the privacy protections promised to participants during the informed consent process.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002583 | Uterine Cervical Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014594 | Uterine Neoplasms |
| D005833 | Genital Neoplasms, Female |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Torigoe R, Dennen C, Mayadev J, Makale MT. Current challenges in the assessment and management of radiotherapy-induced vaginal stenosis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2026 Jan;36(1):102801. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102801. Epub 2025 Nov 17. |
| 36789222 | Background | Sheikh-Wu SF, Anglade D, Downs CA. A cancer survivorship model for holistic cancer care and research. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2023 Jan 1;33(1):4-16. doi: 10.5737/236880763314. eCollection 2023 Winter. |
| 28496367 | Background | Morris L, Do V, Chard J, Brand AH. Radiation-induced vaginal stenosis: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2017 May 2;9:273-279. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S106796. eCollection 2017. |
| 40449074 | Background | Mizutani T, Takei H, Kunitoh H, Wakabayashi M, Sekino Y, Tsuboi M, Ikeda N, Asamura H, Okada M, Takahama M, Ohde Y, Okami J, Shiono S, Aokage K, Watanabe SI; Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group, Japan. Longitudinal assessment of functional independence of older adults after lung cancer surgery: Final results of the JCOG1710A prospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2025 Jul;16(6):102268. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2025.102268. Epub 2025 May 30. |
| 42039773 | Background | Liu M, Lv Z, Xing S, Yi H, Wang L, Wang S, Liu L, Li N. Decision conflict, psychological resilience, and financial toxicity in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in China: A latent profile and mediation analysis. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2026 Feb 26;13:100929. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2026.100929. eCollection 2026 Dec. |
| 38605386 | Background | Hussey C, Hanbridge M, Dowling M, Gupta A. Cancer survivorship: understanding the patients' journey and perspectives on post-treatment needs. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Apr 12;16(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00864-y. |
| 32585933 | Background | Hou P, Hsieh C, Wei M, Hsiao S, Shueng P. Differences in Treatment Outcomes and Prognosis between Elderly and Younger Patients Receiving Definitive Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4510. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124510. |
| 41677932 | Background | Heyman Y, Rojlar H, Hawranek C, Numan Hellquist B, Rosen A. Quality of life, anxiety and cancer worry following hereditary cancer testing: a 6-month Swedish follow-up study. Qual Life Res. 2026 Feb 12;35(3):70. doi: 10.1007/s11136-026-04184-1. |
| 37898849 | Background | Gupta IJ, Ghosh A, Yadav J, Tuteja JS, Gupta R, Srivastava K, Verma M, Gupta S, Srivastava S, Bhatt MLB. External Beam Radiotherapy Interdigitated with High Dose Rate(HDR) Intracavitary Brachytherapy versus External Beam Radiotherapy followed by Sequential HDR Intracavitary Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Carcinoma Cervix-Randomized Control Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Oct 1;24(10):3441-3445. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.10.3441. |
| 31302301 | Background | Damast S, Jeffery DD, Son CH, Hasan Y, Carter J, Lindau ST, Jhingran A. Literature Review of Vaginal Stenosis and Dilator Use in Radiation Oncology. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Nov;9(6):479-491. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 11. |
| 31091469 | Background | Amies Oelschlager AM, Debiec K. Vaginal Dilator Therapy: A Guide for Providers for Assessing Readiness and Supporting Patients Through the Process Successfully. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2019 Aug;32(4):354-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 12. |
| D009369 |
| Neoplasms |
| D002577 | Uterine Cervical Diseases |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |