Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Poor psychosocial functioning, including social disconnection, is common and disabling among Veterans, and often fails to improve following the best available evidence-based treatments, particularly if more severe pathology is present. Behavioral activation (BA) is a promising, low-burden intervention, which could help improve social functioning impairments in Veterans, as this treatment targets social reward sensitivity, an important driving mechanism of social functioning. Thus, the proposed research will test whether BA can specifically improve social functioning in Veterans. Leveraging a neurocomputational framework of social reward seeking behavior, this research will help to improve the treatment and assessment of social function and the prediction of psychosocial treatment needs in Veterans, while providing neurobehavioral targets to develop new interventions that can restore social functioning.
Perceived social disconnection and social isolation are disabling and common among Veterans. Yet, these psychosocial impairments can fail to improve following the best available evidence-based treatments. Behavioral activation (BA), an evidence-based treatment for depression has shown promise in improving social functioning. However, most of this research was conducted in primarily non-Veteran populations and has typically relied on patients' subjective symptoms and self-report, in contrast to objective behavioral probes, to assess social functioning. Moreover, the cognitive mechanisms promoting social behavior remain poorly understood, particularly in Veterans. For instance, social anhedonia, i.e., a reduced sensitivity to social rewards, such as positive human interactions, has been implicated as an important driving mechanism of poor social functioning. Yet, the degree to which BA successfully target social reward sensitivity remains unclear and has not been evaluated in Veterans. This lack of understanding limits the ability to develop more targeted and effective interventions for psychosocial recovery. To address these gaps, this study aims to test the clinical and neurobehavioral effectiveness of BA in targeting social dysfunction in Veterans.
Computational models of reward learning (RL), particularly Bayesian RL learning models, can offer an important bridge to link in-vivo behavior, such as social reward sensitivity, and recovery outcomes like psychosocial functioning, by providing a rich quantitative representation of reward learning and its dynamic updating during reward exploration. This proposal aims to capitalize on this approach, combining a translational behavioral paradigm, Bayesian reinforcement learning modeling, and neuroscientific evaluation of change processes, in order to assay social anhedonia and improve prediction of social functioning as well as understanding and effective dissemination of BA treatment.
The specific aims are to: 1) test the effectiveness of BA in improving social functioning outcomes in Veterans (Aim 1); 2) examine the impact of BA on neurocomputational markers of social reward sensitivity and their relationship to social functioning improvement in Veterans (Aim 2); and 3) assess the degree to which neurocomputational markers of social reward sensitivity predict social functioning recovery in Veterans undergoing BA (Aim 3). This project will also explore whether the relationships between neurocomputational markers of social function and clinical outcomes are moderated by primary diagnosis (exploratory Aim 4).
Veterans (N=136) with impaired social functioning and anhedonia will be recruited and randomized to either behavioral activation (BA) or supportive care therapy (SCT; active control) over 12 weeks. At baseline, immediately post-treatment, and 12-weeks post-treatment (24-weeks follow-up), participants will complete a computerized task aimed at probing social reward-seeking behavior, in which they must choose between unknown partners with the goal of maximizing the number of compliments they receive from these partners. Concurrent brain activity will be collected with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a subset of participants (N=68; at baseline and post-treatment). Therapy sessions and follow-up (24-weeks) assessments will be administered through VA-approved telehealth methods. Computational modeling will be used to derive individual parameters of social reward (i.e., compliments) learning and maximization, and to extract associated neural activity, e.g., neural responses to prediction error signals (discrepancies between expected and actually obtained reward/compliment). Randomization of participants to treatment arms will be be stratified based on fMRI eligibility status, sex, and primary psychiatric diagnosis.
This project is expected to 1) determine if BA offers an effective, low-burden option to improve social functioning in Veterans; 2) identify potential neurocognitive targets, which could be used in future research to develop and test novel treatments to improve psychosocial functioning in Veterans, such as computerized neurocomputational training protocols to boost social reward sensitivity; and 3) help identify precise markers of BA responsiveness for functional recovery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Activation (BA) | Experimental | This arm provides the experimental treatment, i.e., Behavioral Activation therapy. |
|
| Supportive Care Therapy (SCT) | Active Comparator | This arm provides the active control treatment, i.e., Supportive Care Therapy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Behavioral Activation (BA) | Behavioral | BA is a structured behavioral protocol for depression, designed to help individuals increase engagement in meaningful and rewarding activities, thereby breaking the cycle of avoidance and inactivity that often accompanies depression. The protocol teaches patients to increase a) engagement in pleasant, reinforcing activities, with a strong emphasis on social engagement and social connection, b) exploration of values, and c) goal-setting and goal-directed behavior, while monitoring their mood and daily activities |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Social Connectedness Scale - Revised (SCS-R) | Measures the degree to which individuals feel connected to others in their social environment. Scores range from 20 to 120, where higher scores indicate a stronger, healthier sense of social connectedness. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Inventory of Psychosocial Functioning (IPF) | The scale measures the degree of impairment in ability to interact effectively with others, fulfill social roles (e.g., work), and meet personal and societal expectations. It is comprised of 7 subscales. Each item ranges from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater degree of impairment in psychosocial functioning. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Specific Loss of Interest and Pleasure Scale (SLIPS) | This is a measure of social anhedonia, i.e., hypo-responsiveness to social rewards, such as positive human interactions. Scores range from 0 to 69. Higher scores indicate greater severity of social anhedonia. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Social Reward Maximization | Computational parameter derived from behavioral social functioning probe (behavioral reinforcement learning task), capturing the degree to which individuals select social partners they predict to be more rewarding (to offer the most compliments). | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Neural Activation to Social Reward Prediction Errors (RPEs) | Average BOLD (Blood-Oxygenation-Level Dependent) % signal change (i.e., activation) associated with individuals' model-based RPE (difference between expected probability of reward/compliment and actual outcome received. i.e., compliment vs no-compliment). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Psychiatric Diagnosis | Primary diagnostic category (i.e., depressive vs traumatic stress/anxiety disorder) | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reaction to Treatment Questionnaire | Measure of treatment satisfaction and credibility of treatment rationale. Total scores range from 3 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and credibility in the treatment. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12-weeks) |
| Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire (MASQ-D30) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Niloofar Afari, PhD | Contact | (858) 642-3657 | Niloofar.Afari@va.gov |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Katia Harle, MD | VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA | San Diego | California | 92161-0002 | United States |
One or more data sets without personal identifiers will be generated during the data analysis phase of this study. The data sets will include all data underlying any publications generated by this study as well as statistical code, and therefore these will be sufficient to reproduce or verify any published findings.
Any HIPAA identifiers, or combinations of variables that could be used for re-identification, will be excluded, as will any proprietary information. The plan does not include any access to individually identifiable or proprietary data. Therefore, this plan will ensure the protection of personal privacy, the confidentiality of individually identifiable private information, and the security of proprietary data and information.
IPD and supporting information will become available upon completion of the study and publication of the the results.
Final de-identified datasets in machine-readable format will be submitted to and accessed from PubMed Central (and similar sites); care will be taken to ensure that individuals cannot be re-identified using other publicly available information.
Not provided
Not provided
In this double-blind randomized clinical trials, participants will be randomized to complete one of 2 treatment arms: 1) behavioral activation or 2) supportive care therapy. Participants will complete 8 treatment sessions in either treatment arm.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Supportive Care Therapy (SCT) | Behavioral | SCT is a Rogerian non-directive approach and employs techniques to convey a deep understanding of emotions, thoughts, and behaviors of the Veterans receiving this treatment. Specific techniques include content-focused paraphrasing, exploration through open-ended questions (with a goal of empathic understanding), and emotion-focused reflection and validation. Consistent with the SCT model, the therapist will be explicitly instructed not to provide advice, assign activities, or suggest strategies and techniques employed in the BA intervention. |
|
| Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
Measures quality of life and life satisfaction. Includes 4 domain subscales: physical health (range 7-35), psychological health (range 6-30), social relationships (range 3-15), and environment (range 8-42). Higher scores indicate higher quality of life.
| Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) | Measures depression severity. Scores range from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater depression severity. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) | Measures post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) severity. Scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater PTSD severity. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) | This scale measures anxiety severity. Scores range from 0 to 63, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety severity. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) | Measure of anhedonia. Score range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater anhedonia severity. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
Measure of anhedonic depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. The scale has three subscales (general distress, anhedonic depression, and anxious arousal) , with each score ranging from 10 to 50. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. |
| Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) | Assesses the impact of social anxiety on multiple aspects of life. Scores range from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating greater social anxiety. | Baseline, Post-Treatment (12 weeks), Follow-Up (24 weeks) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059445 | Anhedonia |
| D012917 | Social Adjustment |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D012919 | Social Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010166 | Palliative Care |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005791 | Patient Care |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D006296 | Health Services |
| D005159 | Health Care Facilities Workforce and Services |
Not provided
Not provided