Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| W81XWH-15-9-0001 | Other Identifier | Department of Defense |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| United States Department of Defense | FED |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary purpose of this research is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Microlyte® DualGuard wound dressing in the healing of partial thickness donor site wounds, also known as skin graft donor sites. This research will assess wound healing, the occurrence of infection, allergic reaction, pain, and itching while subjects are in the hospital and after discharge. Subjects will complete clinic visits through 12 weeks. This research will also assess the occurrence of donor site wound infection, pain and itching, and scarring at 12 weeks, assessed by subjects using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).
This study is a multi-center randomized, controlled, open-label, split-wound clinical trial to assess the safety and potential effectiveness in wound healing of the Microlyte® DualGuard wound dressing in surgically created partial-thickness donor site wounds (DSW) on patients requiring split-thickness skin grafting.
This clinical trial is designed to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the Microlyte® DualGuard wound dressing. We note that this clinical trial is designed for the management of surgically created clean acute donor-site wounds. These surgically clean acute wounds have high tendency to heal with the standard of care if supervised diligently, especially under the monitoring of a clinical trial.
Donor site wounds are created regularly in surgical hospitals as a means to utilize split-thickness skin grafts for closure of chronic, traumatic, infectious, oncologic, burn and other wounds. A donor site wound is a reproducible partial thickness wound. At the same time, it is associated with morbidity including pain, long healing times, risk of infection, and long-term cosmetic changes. Thus, it is the ideal model for assessment of safety and effectiveness of topical products engineered for wound healing and infection control. The donor site can easily be divided into two halves that are amenable to randomization using intra-patient controls to maximize the chances of assessing safety and effectiveness.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Arm - Proximal or Distal DSW location | Experimental | Treatment with Microlyte DualGuard (investigational device) |
|
| Standard of Care Arm - opposite side of DSW from treatment arm | Active Comparator | The DSW will have a side (proximal or distal) that is randomized to Microlyte DualGuard. The opposite side (proximal or distal) will be treated with standard of care foam dressing (Allevyn). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microlyte DualGuard | Device | Microlyte® DualGuard wound dressing: It is a sterile, single use synthetic polyvinyl alcohol absorbent sheet with ionic gallium, and with a polymeric surface coating containing ionic and metallic silver. It has very low amounts of silver and gallium with maximum of 0.16 mg/sq. in. and 1 mg/sq. in., respectively. Microlyte® DualGuard wound dressing absorbs wound fluid and forms a soft gel that conforms to the wound surface and maintains a moist environment. The dressing contains silver and gallium only to prevent or minimize microbial growth within the dressing. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of wound closure defined as skin re-epithelialization without drainage or dressing requirements, confirmed at two consecutive study visits 2 weeks apart (Day 14 and Day 28) | From enrollment to Day 84 | |
| Adverse event occurrence, including infection | From enrollment to Day 84 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Debridement - yes or no | Enrollment to Day 84 | |
| Pain as measured using a 10-point VAS | Enrollment to Day 84 | |
| Itching as assessed using a 10-point VAS |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Wiggins, BSN, RN, CBRN | Contact | 888-472-9898 | bwiggins@imbedbio.com | |
| Carrie M Huffman, MA, MPH, DLP, RAC-US | Contact | 301-337-8159 | chuffman@imbedbio.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Foster, MD, MBA, FACS | Valleywise Health Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valleywise Health Medical Center | Phoenix | Arizona | 85008 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Multi-center, open label, randomized, split-wound controlled trial
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Allevyn Foam (Standard of Care Control) | Device | Allevyn® is indicated for as wound management by secondary intention on shallow, granulating wounds, chronic and acute exuding wounds, full- and partial-thickness wounds including: leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, surgical wounds, first- and second-degree burns, skin graft donor site, skin tears, and pressure injuries. |
|
| Enrollment to Day 84 |
| Time, in days, to complete DSW closure | Enrollment to Day 84 |
| Percentage of donor site wound closure at Day 9 | Enrollment to Day 9 |
| Quality of healing, evaluated using the Patient Observer Scare Assessment Scale (POSAS) | Day 84 |
| Durability of wound closure at 12 weeks | Day 84 |
| Medstar Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
|
| University Medical Center New Orleans, LSU Health NOLA | New Orleans | Louisiana | 70112 | United States |
|