Pre-Procedure Versus Post-Procedure Administration of Interscalene Block in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Effects on Early Pain Control and Functional Outcomes
Pre-Procedure Versus Post-Procedure Administration of Interscalene Block in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Effects on Early Pain Control and Functional Outcomes
This study is evaluating whether the timing of an interscalene nerve block affects pain control and recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery.
An interscalene block is commonly used to reduce pain after shoulder surgery. However, it is not known whether administering the block before surgery or after surgery provides better outcomes. Participants undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are assigned to receive the interscalene block either before the surgical incision or after completion of the procedure.
The study compares postoperative pain levels, opioid medication use, length of hospital stay, and ultrasound imaging quality during block administration between the two groups. Functional recovery is also assessed using patient-reported outcome measures during follow-up.
The investigators hypothesize that administration of the interscalene block before surgery may provide superior early pain control and reduce postoperative opioid requirements while maintaining similar functional outcomes compared with administration after surgery.
Postoperative pain remains a major challenge following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair despite advances in multimodal analgesia protocols. Inadequate pain control may delay rehabilitation, increase opioid consumption, prolong hospitalization, and negatively affect patient satisfaction. Ultrasound-guided interscalene block has become a cornerstone of perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery because of its proven analgesic efficacy and favorable safety profile.
Although interscalene block is routinely used in clinical practice, the optimal timing of administration remains controversial. Administration before surgical incision may provide preemptive analgesic effects by attenuating central sensitization and reducing nociceptive input during surgery. In contrast, administration after completion of surgery has been proposed as a strategy to extend the duration of postoperative analgesia. Existing literature provides limited and inconsistent evidence regarding the comparative clinical benefits of these approaches in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
This study was designed to evaluate the impact of interscalene block timing within a contemporary shoulder surgery pathway. In addition to its potential influence on perioperative analgesia, the timing of block administration may affect procedural workflow and ultrasound visualization of relevant anatomical structures. Improved understanding of these factors may contribute to optimization of perioperative management strategies and support evidence-based recommendations for regional anesthesia practices in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
kaya.turan@istinye.edu.tr+905332937927