Safety and Efficacy of BiTE in Desensitization Therapy for Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates With cPRA ≥ 90%
Safety and Efficacy of BiTE in Desensitization Therapy for Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates With cPRA ≥ 90%
This study is a prospective, open-label, two-arm exploratory clinical trial aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of Bispecific T-cell Engager (BiTE) therapies in refractory, highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates. Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have a calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 90% and have waited for a transplant for over 5 years, despite receiving standard desensitization therapies (e.g., IVIG, plasmapheresis, rituximab), will be enrolled.
A total of 20 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Blinatumomab (a CD19×CD3 BiTE) or Teclistamab (a BCMA×CD3 BiTE). The primary objective is to evaluate the desensitization response rate, defined as the reduction of cPRA to < 20% or by ≥ 50% from baseline, assessed at multiple time points up to 1 year post-treatment. Secondary objectives include assessing the safety profile (such as the incidence of Cytokine Release Syndrome [CRS] and neurotoxicity), the extent of CD19+ B cell depletion, and the proportion of participants who successfully undergo kidney transplantation within 1 year.
Background:
Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, highly sensitized patients with a calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 90% face significant barriers to finding a compatible donor and have a higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Standard desensitization protocols, primarily utilizing intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and plasmapheresis (PLEX), often fail to achieve long-term reductions in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies because they do not adequately deplete memory B cells and long-lived plasma cells. Bispecific T-cell Engagers (BiTEs) such as Blinatumomab (CD19×CD3) and Teclistamab (BCMA×CD3) directly recruit endogenous T cells to eliminate B cells and plasma cells, respectively. This study investigates whether these targeted therapies can provide a deeper and more sustained desensitization for refractory transplant candidates, bridging them to a successful transplant.
Study Design:
This is a single-center, prospective, non-blinded, two-arm exploratory trial conducted at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. Twenty eligible patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) via block randomization (block size of 4) to either the Blinatumomab arm or the Teclistamab arm.
Interventions:
Arm 1 (Blinatumomab): Administered intravenously. Cycle 1 consists of 9 µg/day for 4 consecutive days (Days 1-4). Following a 7-day interval, Cycle 2 consists of 9 µg/day for another 4 consecutive days (Days 12-15).
Arm 2 (Teclistamab): Administered subcutaneously using a step-up dosing schedule to mitigate Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) risk. Cycle 1 involves 0.06 mg/kg on Day 1 and 0.3 mg/kg on Day 2. Following a 7-day interval, Cycle 2 involves a target dose of 1.5 mg/kg on Day 10.
Study Objectives & Endpoints:
Primary Endpoint: Desensitization response rate evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. A positive response is defined as a reduction of cPRA from >90% to <20% (or a ≥50% decrease from baseline), or the conversion of positive HLA antibodies to negative, or a ≥50% reduction in Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) to a predefined threshold.
Secondary Endpoints:
Safety and tolerability, including the incidence and severity of CRS, Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS), infections, and neutropenia.
Changes in peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets, with a specific focus on CD19+ B cell depletion and recovery trends.
Duration of sustained low cPRA levels. Proportion of patients receiving a kidney transplant within 1 year.
Safety Monitoring:
Given the mechanism of action of BiTEs, strict monitoring for adverse events like CRS and ICANS is integrated into the protocol, utilizing ASTCT consensus grading standards. Treatment algorithms for managing severe events (e.g., using tocilizumab or corticosteroids) are predefined. An independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) consisting of multidisciplinary experts will oversee the study. The protocol includes strict stopping rules for severe toxicities, such as ≥ Grade 3 CRS/ICANS refractory to standard treatment, severe infections, or treatment-related mortality, to ensure patient safety throughout the trial.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
fancyplain@163.com+86 17208274528