Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical trial is designed to evaluate whether a stepwise injection-based treatment approach can reduce pain and improve function in adults with joint hypermobility, connective tissue laxity, and joint instability.
Joint hypermobility occurs when joints move beyond their normal range, often because of looser connective tissue. For some patients, this can contribute to chronic pain, recurrent instability, reduced function, and disability. This study focuses on adults with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS), hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD), or joint instability after injury who have already completed physical therapy without adequate relief.
The main question this study aims to answer is whether the first treatment step, dextrose prolotherapy, can reduce pain by 40% or more two weeks after the second injection.
Participants will receive treatment in a step-by-step sequence, based on their response:
Step 1: Dextrose prolotherapy A dextrose-based injection used to stimulate a healing response in ligament, tendon, or joint-supporting tissue.
Step 2: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) An injection prepared from the participant's own blood, designed to support tissue repair and recovery.
Step 3: Doxycycline injections A low-dose injectable treatment used in this study to help protect joint-supporting tissue. It is not being used to treat infection.
Alternative option: Hyaluronic acid injections An injection into the joint that may be offered if the earlier treatment steps do not provide enough improvement.
Each treatment step begins with two injections, given approximately two weeks apart. If a participant improves by 40% or more, they may continue with that treatment pathway. If they do not improve enough, they may be offered the next step in the study.
Participants will be followed for up to 12 months, with study visits used to monitor pain, function, treatment response, and safety.
This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, step-care interventional study evaluating a structured regenerative medicine treatment protocol for adults with symptomatic joint hypermobility or instability who have failed conservative therapy including physical therapy.
All eligible participants begin with dextrose prolotherapy (20% final concentration). Response is assessed at 2 weeks after the second injection using the Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) scale. Participants who improve by 40% or more continue with that treatment. Those who do not improve enough are offered the next treatment in the sequence.
The step-care sequence is:
Phase 1: Dextrose prolotherapy (20% dextrose with local anesthetic) Phase 2: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prolotherapy Phase 3: Investigational injectable doxycycline hyclate prolotherapy (10 mg/mL; 5-25 mg per joint site; maximum 100 mg per session) Alternative pathway: Visco-3 hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation (FDA-approved for knee osteoarthritis; off-label use in other joints disclosed in consent)
Each phase follows the same cycle: 2 injections approximately 2 weeks apart, followed by a decision point at 2 weeks after the second injection. The dextrose phase decision point is the study primary endpoint.
Outcome measures collected include the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI), and region-appropriate joint-specific functional measures (DASH for upper extremity, KOOS for knee, LEFS for lower extremity, ODI for spine). Long-term follow-up occurs at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Safety is monitored continuously. An Independent Medical Monitor reviews all serious adverse events. The injectable doxycycline use is investigational; an IND exemption determination request has been submitted to the FDA. Enrollment into the doxycycline phase will not begin until the FDA determination is received and IRB approval is in place.
The study is investigator-initiated with no external funding. It is conducted at a single site - Manhattan Pain Medicine, New York, NY.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Step-Care Regenerative Injection Treatment | Experimental | All participants receive a step-care sequence beginning with dextrose prolotherapy. Those who do not improve by 40% or more are offered rotation to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prolotherapy, then to investigational doxycycline prolotherapy. A hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation pathway is available as an alternative for participants who do not respond to or cannot tolerate the regenerative steps. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dextrose 20% Prolotherapy | Drug | Hypertonic dextrose solution injected at periarticular ligament-bone junctions at 20% final concentration, combined with local anesthetic. Two injections approximately 2 weeks apart per phase. Up to 4 injections total. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) Responder Rate After Dextrose Prolotherapy | Proportion of participants achieving at least 40% improvement on the Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) scale relative to baseline. The GPI is a validated patient-reported outcome measure used in prolotherapy research in which participants rate their overall percentage of improvement from 0% (no improvement) to 100% (complete improvement). A participant is classified as a responder if they report 40% or greater improvement. This threshold also serves as the step-care decision rule: responders continue dextrose; non-responders are offered rotation to the next treatment. | 2 weeks after the second dextrose prolotherapy injection (approximately 4 weeks after enrollment) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Score | Change from baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity subscale, a validated 4-item patient-reported measure assessing worst, least, average, and current pain on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults age 18 years or older, any gender.
Symptomatic joint hypermobility or instability attributable to one of the following:
Objective evidence of instability or clinically relevant hypermobility at one or more target joints, defined as at least one of:
Pain attributable to the target joint for at least 3 months.
Baseline pain score of 4 or greater on a 0-10 numeric rating scale.
Failure of conservative treatment, including at least 6 weeks of physical therapy directed at the affected joint(s).
Not currently using NSAIDs and willing to avoid NSAIDs during the active treatment period, when clinically appropriate.
Able to provide informed consent and to comply with study procedures and follow-up.
Additional eligibility for the Hyaluronic Acid (HA) alternative pathway - a participant may enter the HA pathway if ALL of the following apply, in addition to the inclusion criteria above:
Has completed at least one regenerative medicine phase (dextrose, PRP, or doxycycline) and either
A minimum waiting period of 4 weeks has elapsed since the last regenerative medicine treatment attempted, to allow resolution of post-injection effects before HA administration.
The target joint(s) have clinical or imaging features amenable to HA viscosupplementation (e.g., articular/osteoarthritic pain component identifiable on examination or imaging).
No contraindication to HA (see Exclusion Criteria).
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mariia Safroshkina, MD, Medical Doctor | Contact | 2139329721 | research@manhattanpainmedicine.com | |
| Jason Siefferman, MD, Medical Doctor | Contact | 7735052512 | research@manhattanpainmedicine.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jason Siefferman, MD | Manhattan Pain Medicine | Principal Investigator |
| Mariia Safroshkina, MD | Manhattan Pain Medicine | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18929686 | Background | Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30. | |
| 23827007 | Background |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-site, investigator-initiated feasibility study with no external funding and no data sharing agreement in place. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers. All participants are assigned unique study ID numbers and their data are maintained under HIPAA-compliant privacy protections at Manhattan Pain Medicine. Aggregate de-identified findings will be reported through peer-reviewed publication. Future sharing of de-identified data may be considered on a case-by-case basis consistent with the IRB-approved consent form and applicable privacy regulations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All participants begin with dextrose prolotherapy. Response is assessed at 2 weeks after the second injection using the Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) scale. Participants who improve by 40% or more continue with the same treatment. Those who do not improve enough are offered the next treatment in the sequence: platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prolotherapy, then investigational doxycycline prolotherapy. A hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation pathway is available as an alternative for participants who do not respond to or cannot tolerate the regenerative treatments. Not all participants will receive all treatments - progression through the steps depends on each participant's response.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma | Biological | Leukocyte-poor platelet-rich plasma prepared from a 30-60 mL autologous whole blood draw using an FDA-cleared PRP preparation system. Two injections approximately 2 weeks apart per phase. Up to 4 injections total. |
|
|
| Doxycycline Hyclate Injectable (Investigational) | Drug | Doxycycline hyclate 10 mg/mL reconstituted from commercially available lyophilized powder at point of care, combined with 20% dextrose and local anesthetic. Dose: 5-25 mg per joint site; maximum 100 mg per session. Two injections approximately 2 weeks apart per phase. Up to 4 injections total. Use as prolotherapy agent is investigational. |
|
| Visco-3 Sodium Hyaluronate Viscosupplementation | Device | Visco-3 (sodium hyaluronate 25 mg/2.5 mL), FDA-approved for knee osteoarthritis. Used as an alternative pathway for participants who do not respond to or cannot tolerate regenerative phases. Up to 3 syringes per joint per course. Off-label use in non-knee joints is disclosed in the informed consent form. |
|
| Baseline, 2 weeks after second injection of each phase, and at 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Change in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Score | Change from baseline in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) interference subscale, a validated 7-item patient-reported measure assessing how pain interferes with general activity, mood, walking, work, relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life on a 0-10 numeric rating scale. Scores range from 0 to 10 per item and are averaged to a total interference score of 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no interference and 10 indicates complete interference. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | Baseline, 2 weeks after second injection of each phase, and at 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Change in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score | Change from baseline in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, a validated 30-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing physical function and symptoms in people with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper extremity. Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates maximum disability. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Administered to participants whose primary target joint is in the upper extremity. | Baseline, 2 weeks after second injection of each phase, and at 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Change in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) | Change from baseline in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), a validated patient-reported outcome measure assessing symptoms, pain, function in daily living, function in sport and recreation, and knee-related quality of life. Each of five subscales is scored from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates extreme problems and 100 indicates no problems. Higher scores indicate better outcome. Administered to participants whose primary target joint is the knee. | Baseline, 2 weeks after second injection of each phase, and at 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Change in Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) Score | Change from baseline in the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), a validated 20-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing function in people with lower extremity musculoskeletal conditions. Scores range from 0 to 80, where 0 indicates inability to perform any activities and 80 indicates no difficulty with any activities. Higher scores indicate better outcome. Administered to participants whose primary target joint is in the lower extremity (excluding knee). | Baseline, 2 weeks after second injection of each phase, and at 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Change in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score | Change from baseline in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a validated 10-item patient-reported outcome measure assessing degree of disability and quality of life in people with low back pain. Scores range from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no disability and 100 indicates maximum disability. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. Administered to participants whose primary target joint is in the spine. | Baseline, 2 weeks after second injection of each phase, and at 3, 6, and 12 months |
| Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) Responder Rate After PRP Prolotherapy | Proportion of participants rotated to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) prolotherapy who achieve at least 40% improvement on the GPI scale at the PRP phase decision point, among participants who did not respond to dextrose prolotherapy. | 2 weeks after the second PRP prolotherapy injection |
| Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) Responder Rate After Doxycycline Prolotherapy | Proportion of participants rotated to investigational doxycycline prolotherapy who achieve at least 40% improvement on the GPI scale at the doxycycline phase decision point, among participants who did not respond to dextrose and PRP prolotherapy. | 2 weeks after the second doxycycline prolotherapy injection |
| Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) Response After Hyaluronic Acid Viscosupplementation | GPI score at end-of-course assessment among participants who entered the alternative hyaluronic acid (HA) viscosupplementation pathway after failure of or adverse reaction to regenerative phases. Reported descriptively; not compared to regenerative phase outcomes. | 2 weeks after the final hyaluronic acid injection of the course |
| Durability of Response: Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) Score at 3, 6, and 12 Months | Global Percentage of Improvement (GPI) score at 3, 6, and 12 months from the primary endpoint assessment, evaluating maintenance of treatment response and need for additional treatment over time. The GPI is a patient-reported scale ranging from 0% to 100%, where 0% indicates no improvement and 100% indicates complete improvement relative to baseline. Higher scores indicate better outcome. | 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months from primary endpoint |
| Durability of Response: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Score at 3, 6, and 12 Months | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain severity subscale score at 3, 6, and 12 months from the primary endpoint assessment, evaluating maintenance of pain reduction over time. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months from primary endpoint |
| Durability of Response: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Interference Score at 3, 6, and 12 Months | Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale score at 3, 6, and 12 months from the primary endpoint assessment, evaluating maintenance of functional improvement over time. Scores range from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no interference and 10 indicates complete interference with daily activities. Higher scores indicate worse outcome. | 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months from primary endpoint |
| Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events | Frequency, severity, and relatedness of adverse events for each study agent (dextrose, PRP, doxycycline) and for the hyaluronic acid pathway, assessed using a standardized Adverse Event Documentation Form at every study contact. Serious adverse events are reported separately. Severity is classified as mild, moderate, or severe. | From first injection through 12-month follow-up |
| Number of Treatments Required to Achieve Adequate Response | Total number of injection sessions required before a participant achieves GPI of 40% or greater, describing the treatment burden associated with the step-care approach. | From enrollment through completion of active treatment phase, up to 12 months |
| Mahesh M; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. NCRP 168: its significance to fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Jul;10(7):551-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.04.003. No abstract available. |
| 4751776 | Background | Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973 Sep;32(5):413-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.32.5.413. No abstract available. |
| 11074683 | Background | Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00017. |
| 10201543 | Background | Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999 Apr;79(4):371-83. |
| 9699158 | Background | Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)--development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 Aug;28(2):88-96. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88. |
| 8773720 | Background | Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L. |
| 8080219 | Background | Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38. |
| 40004802 | Background | Glinkowski WM, Tomaszewski W. Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Umbrella Review. J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 14;14(4):1272. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041272. |
| 34745480 | Background | Peck J, Slovek A, Miro P, Vij N, Traube B, Lee C, Berger AA, Kassem H, Kaye AD, Sherman WF, Abd-Elsayed A. A Comprehensive Review of Viscosupplementation in Osteoarthritis of the Knee. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2021 Jul 10;13(2):25549. doi: 10.52965/001c.25549. eCollection 2021. |
| 21689755 | Background | Castro MM, Kandasamy AD, Youssef N, Schulz R. Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor properties of tetracyclines: therapeutic potential in cardiovascular diseases. Pharmacol Res. 2011 Dec;64(6):551-60. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 May 31. |
| 6315909 | Background | Golub LM, Lee HM, Lehrer G, Nemiroff A, McNamara TF, Kaplan R, Ramamurthy NS. Minocycline reduces gingival collagenolytic activity during diabetes. Preliminary observations and a proposed new mechanism of action. J Periodontal Res. 1983 Sep;18(5):516-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1983.tb00388.x. No abstract available. |
| 19651823 | Background | Alsousou J, Thompson M, Hulley P, Noble A, Willett K. The biology of platelet-rich plasma and its application in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Aug;91(8):987-96. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B8.22546. |
| 33096812 | Background | Everts P, Onishi K, Jayaram P, Lana JF, Mautner K. Platelet-Rich Plasma: New Performance Understandings and Therapeutic Considerations in 2020. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Oct 21;21(20):7794. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207794. |
| 28460873 | Background | Refai H. Long-term therapeutic effects of dextrose prolotherapy in patients with hypermobility of the temporomandibular joint: a single-arm study with 1-4 years' follow up. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jun;55(5):465-470. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2016.12.002. Epub 2017 Apr 29. |
| 28484944 | Background | Rabago D, Nourani B. Prolotherapy for Osteoarthritis and Tendinopathy: a Descriptive Review. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017 Jun;19(6):34. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0659-3. |
| 3227356 | Background | Nordstrom CR. Exploring pluralism--the many faces of Ayurveda. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(5):479-89. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90371-1. |
| 28186390 | Background | Chopra P, Tinkle B, Hamonet C, Brock I, Gompel A, Bulbena A, Francomano C. Pain management in the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):212-219. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31554. Epub 2017 Feb 10. |
| 24238699 | Background | Palmer S, Bailey S, Barker L, Barney L, Elliott A. The effectiveness of therapeutic exercise for joint hypermobility syndrome: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Oct 5. |
| 28145611 | Background | Tinkle B, Castori M, Berglund B, Cohen H, Grahame R, Kazkaz H, Levy H. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome Type III and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type): Clinical description and natural history. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):48-69. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31538. Epub 2017 Feb 1. |
| 33856167 | Background | Yew KS, Kamps-Schmitt KA, Borge R. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorders. Am Fam Physician. 2021 Apr 15;103(8):481-492. |
| 40869462 | Background | Daylor V, Griggs M, Weintraub A, Byrd R, Petrucci T, Huff M, Byerly K, Fenner R, Severance S, Griggs C, Sharma A, Atwal P, Kautz SA, Shapiro S, Youkhana K, Lavallee M, Wilkerson A, Nichols M, Snyder A, Eichinger JK, Patel S, Maitland A, Gensemer C, Norris RA. Defining the Chronic Complexities of hEDS and HSD: A Global Survey of Diagnostic Challenges, Life-Long Comorbidities, and Unmet Needs. J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 9;14(16):5636. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165636. |
| 31685485 | Background | Demmler JC, Atkinson MD, Reinhold EJ, Choy E, Lyons RA, Brophy ST. Diagnosed prevalence of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder in Wales, UK: a national electronic cohort study and case-control comparison. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 4;9(11):e031365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031365. |
| 8145606 | Background | Tansey EM. Protection against dog distemper and Dogs Protection Bills: the Medical Research Council and anti-vivisectionist protest, 1911-1933. Med Hist. 1994 Jan;38(1):1-26. doi: 10.1017/s0025727300056027. No abstract available. |
| Background | Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, et al., eds. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome [GeneReviews]. Seattle: University of Washington; updated 2022. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1279/ |
| 27429562 | Background | Hauser RA, Lackner JB, Steilen-Matias D, Harris DK. A Systematic Review of Dextrose Prolotherapy for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 7;9:139-59. doi: 10.4137/CMAMD.S39160. eCollection 2016. |
| 28306229 | Background | Malfait F, Francomano C, Byers P, Belmont J, Berglund B, Black J, Bloom L, Bowen JM, Brady AF, Burrows NP, Castori M, Cohen H, Colombi M, Demirdas S, De Backer J, De Paepe A, Fournel-Gigleux S, Frank M, Ghali N, Giunta C, Grahame R, Hakim A, Jeunemaitre X, Johnson D, Juul-Kristensen B, Kapferer-Seebacher I, Kazkaz H, Kosho T, Lavallee ME, Levy H, Mendoza-Londono R, Pepin M, Pope FM, Reinstein E, Robert L, Rohrbach M, Sanders L, Sobey GJ, Van Damme T, Vandersteen A, van Mourik C, Voermans N, Wheeldon N, Zschocke J, Tinkle B. The 2017 international classification of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2017 Mar;175(1):8-26. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31552. |
| 10710805 | Background | Reeves KD, Hassanein K. Randomized prospective double-blind placebo-controlled study of dextrose prolotherapy for knee osteoarthritis with or without ACL laxity. Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Mar;6(2):68-74, 77-80. |
| 39055287 | Background | Michalak N, Banks D, Kane L, Siefferman J. Dextrose Prolotherapy for the Treatment of Chronic Shoulder Pain in Patients With Joint Hypermobility: A Case Series. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jul 24;17:11795441241264821. doi: 10.1177/11795441241264821. eCollection 2024. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C536196 | Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 3 |
| D004535 | Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome |
| D007593 | Joint Instability |
| D059352 | Musculoskeletal Pain |
| D013180 | Sprains and Strains |
| D004204 | Joint Dislocations |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020141 | Hemostatic Disorders |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D006474 | Hemorrhagic Disorders |
| D006402 | Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D012868 | Skin Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D012873 | Skin Diseases, Genetic |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D003095 | Collagen Diseases |
| D003240 | Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005947 | Glucose |
| D000075527 | Prolotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006601 | Hexoses |
| D009005 | Monosaccharides |
| D000073893 | Sugars |
| D002241 | Carbohydrates |
| D000529 | Complementary Therapies |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided