Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOHW/IRB/2026/002 | Other Identifier | Belize Ministry of Health and Wellness IRB | |
| GEN/21/26(112) VOL. III | Other Identifier | Belize Ministry of Education (MOECST) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Hillside Health Care | UNKNOWN |
| Toledo Community College | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
THRIVE-Belize is a school-based program being developed to support the health and well-being of adolescents in the Toledo District of southern Belize. The program covers seven topics: communication and emotional regulation, healthy expressions of masculinity, sexual and reproductive health, healthy relationships, mental and physical health, substance use prevention, and environmental health.
Before testing whether the program works, the research team needs to learn whether students, teachers, parents, school staff, and community members find it acceptable, appropriate, and practical to deliver at Toledo Community College. This study (Phase I) does not deliver the program to anyone. Instead, it gathers feedback through surveys, focus groups, and interviews with about 280 participants across these five groups.
The information collected will be used to refine the program and decide whether to move forward to a future pilot study. No medical or educational intervention is given to participants in this phase.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Students | TCC students in Forms 1-4, ages 12-18, providing feedback on the proposed curriculum via surveys, focus groups, and interviews. | ||
| Teachers | TCC teachers assigned to Forms 1-4, providing feedback via surveys, focus groups, and interviews. | ||
| Parents/Guardians | Parents or legal guardians of eligible TCC students, providing feedback via surveys, focus groups, and interviews. | ||
| School Principal and Administrative Staff | TCC principal and administrative staff, providing feedback via surveys and interviews. | ||
| Community Stakeholders | Toledo District community members with expertise in adolescent health, education, or youth services, providing feedback via surveys and interviews. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptability of the proposed intervention (AIM) | Mean score on the adapted 4-item Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree). A mean score of 4.0 or higher indicates acceptability. | Single timepoint at post-assessment data collection (study months 1-2) |
| Appropriateness of the proposed intervention (IAM) | Mean score on the adapted 4-item Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), 5-point Likert scale. A mean score of 4.0 or higher indicates appropriateness. | Single timepoint at post-assessment data collection (study months 1-2) |
| Feasibility of the proposed intervention (FIM) | Mean score on the adapted 4-item Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), 5-point Likert scale. A mean score of 4.0 or higher indicates feasibility. | Single timepoint at post-assessment data collection (study months 1-2) |
| Adoption and organizational readiness | Proportion of stakeholders expressing intent to support or participate in the proposed intervention, supplemented by qualitative themes related to readiness and barriers from focus groups and interviews. | Single timepoint at post-assessment data collection (study months 1-2) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment and consent feasibility | Consent/assent rates (target: at least 60%), retention rates, and reasons for non-participation. | Throughout the recruitment period (study months 1-2) |
| Measurement feasibility and respondent burden |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Adolescents aged 12-18 (Forms 1-4) and adult stakeholders (teachers, parents/guardians, principal and administrative staff, and community stakeholders) at one secondary school in the Toledo District, Belize.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mario Morales, PhD | Contact | 520-645-5878 | mariomorales@arizona.edu | |
| Gabriela Valdez, PhD | Contact | 520-626-6530 | gvaldez@arizona.edu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toledo Community College | Punta Gorda | Toledo District | 454V+3CH | Belize |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23295957 | Background | Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gotzsche PC, Krleza-Jeric K, Hrobjartsson A, Mann H, Dickersin K, Berlin JA, Dore CJ, Parulekar WR, Summerskill WS, Groves T, Schulz KF, Sox HC, Rockhold FW, Rennie D, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583. | |
| 27777223 |
Not provided
Not provided
No public release of individual participant data (IPD) is planned due to the small sample size and potential for re-identification in a single-school setting. De-identified aggregate data may be made available upon reasonable request following primary publication, subject to University of Arizona IRB approval, Belize Ministry of Health and Wellness IRB approval, and a formal data sharing agreement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Survey completion rates (target: at least 90%), item-level missingness, and participant-reported comprehension of instruments.
| Single timepoint at post-assessment data collection (study months 1-2) |
| Facilitator and delivery feasibility | Qualitative assessment of teacher capacity, willingness to deliver the curriculum (target: at least 60% willing), training needs, and scheduling constraints. | Single timepoint at post-assessment data collection (study months 1-2) |
| Background |
| Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239. |
| 30473365 | Background | Shinde S, Weiss HA, Varghese B, Khandeparkar P, Pereira B, Sharma A, Gupta R, Ross DA, Patton G, Patel V. Promoting school climate and health outcomes with the SEHER multi-component secondary school intervention in Bihar, India: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 8;392(10163):2465-2477. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31615-5. Epub 2018 Nov 22. |
| 27174304 | Background | Patton GC, Sawyer SM, Santelli JS, Ross DA, Afifi R, Allen NB, Arora M, Azzopardi P, Baldwin W, Bonell C, Kakuma R, Kennedy E, Mahon J, McGovern T, Mokdad AH, Patel V, Petroni S, Reavley N, Taiwo K, Waldfogel J, Wickremarathne D, Barroso C, Bhutta Z, Fatusi AO, Mattoo A, Diers J, Fang J, Ferguson J, Ssewamala F, Viner RM. Our future: a Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00579-1. Epub 2016 May 9. No abstract available. |