Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a Phase I, single-center, open-label, single-arm clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of personalized neoantigen polyepitope peptide vaccine combined with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced, recurrent or refractory renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Background: Renal cell carcinoma is one of the most common malignancies of the urinary system. Although pembrolizumab has become a standard first-line treatment, the objective response rate (ORR) of monotherapy is only 20-40%, and most patients eventually develop primary or acquired resistance. Tumor neoantigens are specific antigens produced by tumor-specific gene mutations, with high immunogenicity and tumor specificity, making them ideal targets for tumor immunotherapy. Preliminary clinical studies have shown that neoantigen vaccines can produce synergistic effects when combined with pembrolizumab.
Study Design: This is an investigator-initiated trial (IIT) conducted at Peking University First Hospital. The study will enroll 5-8 patients in two stages: an initial safety assessment cohort (3 patients) followed by an expansion cohort (5 additional patients) if safety criteria are met. The study drug is a personalized neoantigen polyepitope peptide vaccine (Neo-RCC), produced by Mingzhibenyuan Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., based on whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) of each patient's tumor tissue. The vaccine is administered via subcutaneous injection in combination with Polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with poly-L-lysine and carboxymethylcellulose (Poly-ICLC) adjuvant, with a priming phase (5 injections on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21) and a boosting phase (3 injections on Weeks 6, 12, and 20), totaling 8 injections. Pembrolizumab (200 mg intravenous [IV] every 3 weeks [Q3W]) is administered concurrently as combination therapy.
Primary Objective: To evaluate the safety of the personalized neoantigen peptide vaccine in advanced RCC patients, as measured by the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v5.0.
Secondary Objectives: To evaluate pharmacokinetic characteristics; to assess efficacy including objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Key Eligibility Criteria: Adults (≥18 years) with Stage III or IV, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic non-surgical RCC who have achieved disease stability for ≥3 months after prior targeted therapy combined with pembrolizumab; measurable disease per RECIST v1.1; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-3; adequate organ function; and ≥50 tumor gene mutations detectable from biopsy tissue.
Safety Monitoring: A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will oversee patient safety. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are defined according to protocol-specified criteria. If ≥2 DLTs occur in the initial cohort, the adjuvant dose will be reduced by 50% and the study will proceed with a de-escalation cohort.
Study Rationale: This study addresses the unmet need for effective second-line or later treatment options for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients who have progressed or become refractory after initial immunotherapy. The combination strategy leverages the complementary mechanisms of personalized neoantigen vaccines (which activate tumor-specific T-cell responses) and pembrolizumab (which blocks programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-mediated immune suppression), potentially overcoming PD-1 inhibitor resistance.
Neoantigen Prediction and Vaccine Manufacturing: Tumor tissue and peripheral blood samples are collected for whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). A proprietary neoantigen prediction platform (neoTrue AI) analyzes sequencing data to identify tumor-specific mutations and predict neoantigen-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binding affinity. The top 10-30 ranked neoantigen peptides are selected for Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade synthesis. The median manufacturing period is approximately 12 weeks. Each peptide is 300 μg, mixed with Polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized with poly-L-lysine and carboxymethylcellulose (Poly-ICLC) adjuvant (0.5 mg per pool), and administered as 4 pools (left/right axilla and left/right groin) in 250 μL per injection site.
Pembrolizumab Administration: Pembrolizumab 200 mg is administered intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W), diluted in 100 mL 0.9% sodium chloride over 30 minutes. Treatment continues for up to 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. During the vaccine manufacturing period (~12 weeks), pembrolizumab may be continued as bridging therapy to maintain disease stability.
Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Definition: Hematologic: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <0.5×10⁹/L) lasting >7 days; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (<25×10⁹/L) within 7 days. Non-hematologic: Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >7 days (with specified exceptions); Grade 4 toxicity. Immune-related: ≥Grade 3 immune pneumonitis, colitis, hepatitis; any-grade myocarditis; ≥Grade 2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) or immune encephalitis; ≥Grade 3 severe skin reactions (Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis [SJS/TEN], drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms [DRESS]). Other: ≥Grade 2 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (per American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy [ASTCT] criteria); ≥Grade 3 injection-site reactions requiring surgical intervention; ≥Grade 3 allergic reactions; ≥Grade 3 infections; ≥Grade 3 thromboembolic events; ≥Grade 3 bleeding.
DLT Management: If ≥2 DLTs occur in the first 3 patients during the first 8 weeks (D0-D56), the adjuvant total dose will be reduced by 50% (to 1.0 mg), and 2 additional patients will be enrolled in the de-escalation cohort. If ≥2 DLTs occur in the de-escalation cohort, the study will be terminated. If ≥3 DLTs occur in the expansion cohort, the regimen will be deemed to have unacceptable toxicity.
Efficacy Assessments: Tumor assessments by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 are conducted at screening, every 6-8 weeks during treatment, at treatment completion/early termination, and during follow-up. Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) may be used as sensitivity analysis.
Pharmacokinetic/Immunogenicity Assessments: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are collected at baseline, 24-72 hours post-injection, every 2 treatment cycles, and at treatment completion. Neoantigen-specific T-cell responses are quantified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), granzyme B, and perforin mRNA expression. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing is performed to track clonal expansion. Circulating tumor DNA minimal residual disease (ctDNA-MRD) monitoring panels are designed based on each patient's WES data and detected by targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS).
Follow-up Schedule: Long-term follow-up every 3 months for survival status and subsequent anti-tumor treatments.
Risk Mitigation: Comprehensive risk management plans are established for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), infections, injection-related reactions, adjuvant-related risks, pseudoprogression, hyperprogressive disease, and RCC-specific complications (paraneoplastic syndromes, hemorrhage, thromboembolism). A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) is constituted to oversee safety.
Funding: This study is supported by a research grant from the GenScript Life Science Research Grant Program (2024), with additional support from Mingzhibenyuan Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. for neoantigen prediction and peptide synthesis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neo-RCC + Pembrolizumab | Experimental | All enrolled patients receive the same experimental intervention: personalized neoantigen polyepitope peptide vaccine (Neo-RCC) combined with pembrolizumab. The neoantigen vaccine is individually designed based on whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing of each patient's tumor tissue, synthesized as 10-30 peptides (300 μg each), mixed with Poly-ICLC adjuvant, and administered via subcutaneous injection at 4 sites (bilateral axilla and groin) over 8 injections (priming on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21; boosting on Weeks 6, 12, 20). Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV is administered every 3 weeks concurrently. Enrollment follows a two-stage design: initial safety cohort (n=3) followed by expansion cohort (n=5) if dose-limiting toxicity criteria are met. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personalized Neoantigen Polyepitope Peptide Vaccine | Drug | This intervention consists of a personalized neoantigen polyepitope peptide vaccine (Neo-RCC) individually designed and manufactured for each patient based on whole exome sequencing (WES) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) of tumor tissue. The vaccine contains 10-30 synthetic long peptides (300 μg each) predicted to bind to the patient's Human Leukocyte Antigen(HLA), mixed with Poly-ICLC adjuvant (0.5 mg per pool). The total peptide dose is 4-9 mg per patient. Administration is via subcutaneous injection at 4 anatomical sites (bilateral axilla and bilateral groin) in 250 μL per site. The vaccination schedule includes a priming phase (5 injections on Days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21) and a boosting phase (3 injections on Weeks 6, 12, and 20), totaling 8 injections over approximately 20 weeks. The vaccine is administered in combination with pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Manufacturing is conducted under GMP conditions by Mingzhibenyuan Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) | The primary safety endpoint is the incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE), graded according to NCI CTCAE v5.0. TEAE is defined as any adverse event that occurs from the first administration of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose, or before initiation of new anti-tumor therapy, whichever occurs first. Key assessments include: (1) overall TEAE incidence rate; (2) Grade ≥3 TEAE incidence rate; (3) serious adverse event (SAE) incidence rate; (4) adverse events of special interest (AESI) including immune-related adverse events (irAEs), injection-site reactions, and cytokine release syndrome; (5) TEAE leading to dose modification, interruption, or permanent discontinuation; (6) treatment-related death. Safety monitoring covers the screening period, treatment period (8 vaccine injections over ~20 weeks plus concurrent pembrolizumab), and follow-up period. | From first dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose, approximately 24 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 | Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients achieving best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. Tumor assessments are conducted by CT or MRI at screening, every 6-8 weeks during treatment, at treatment completion/early termination, and during follow-up. Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) may be used as sensitivity analysis. ORR reflects the anti-tumor activity of the personalized neoantigen polyepitope peptide vaccine combined with pembrolizumab in advanced RCC patients. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Histologically or cytologically confirmed Stage III or IV, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) not amenable to curative surgery
Disease stability for ≥3 months after prior single pembrolizumab therapy, with documented progression or intolerance to standard treatment
At least one measurable lesion per RECIST v1.1 (longest diameter ≥10 mm for non-lymph node lesions; short axis ≥15 mm for lymph nodes; or bone lesions confirmed by CT/MRI)
Age ≥18 years
Estimated life expectancy ≥3 months
ECOG performance status 0-3
Availability of tumor tissue (biopsy or archival specimen) for whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), with ≥50 tumor gene mutations detectable
Adequate organ function as defined by laboratory parameters within 14 days prior to enrollment:
8.1 Hematologic: Absolute Neutrophil Count(ANC) ≥1.5×10⁹/L, platelet count ≥100×10⁹/L, hemoglobin ≥90 g/L; 8.2 Hepatic: total bilirubin(TBIL) ≤1.5×Upper Limit of Normal(ULN), Aspartate Aminotransferase(AST)/Alanine Aminotransferase(ALT) ≤2.5×ULN (≤5×ULN if liver metastases present); 8.3 Renal: serum creatinine ≤1.5×ULN or creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula); 8.4 Coagulation: international normalized ratio(INR) ≤1.5, activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT) ≤1.5×ULN; 8.5 Cardiac: Left Ventricular Ejection Fractions(LVEF) ≥50% by echocardiography;
Ability to comply with study procedures and follow-up schedule;
Signed informed consent form;
For women of childbearing potential: negative serum pregnancy test (Human Chorionic Gonadotropin sensitivity ≤25 IU/L) within 7 days prior to enrollment; agreement to use effective contraception during study and for 4 weeks after last dose;
For men: agreement to use effective contraception during study and for 4 weeks after last dose.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pregnant or lactating women
Prior treatment with:
2.1 Two or more lines of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) systemic therapy; 2.2 CTLA-4 inhibitor (e.g., ipilimumab); 2.3 Tumor vaccine therapy (including neoantigen vaccine, dendritic cell vaccine, etc.); 2.4 Chemotherapy specifically for renal cell carcinoma; 2.5 Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell or solid organ transplantation;
Active autoimmune disease or other immune-mediated disorders requiring systemic immunosuppressive therapy;
Participation in another investigational drug study within 4 weeks prior to first dose;
Active infection including:
5.1 Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus(HIV) infection; 5.2 Active hepatitis B (HBsAg positive and Hepatitis B Virus-DNA >500 IU/mL) or hepatitis C (HCV-RNA positive); 5.3 Active tuberculosis (T-SPOT or PPD positive with clinical symptoms, or chest CT suggestive of active TB); 5.4 Severe infection requiring intravenous antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to enrollment, or uncontrolled systemic infection;
Symptomatic central nervous system (CNS) metastases; exception: patients with treated CNS metastases stable for ≥4 weeks without neurological symptoms and without corticosteroid requirement;
Uncontrolled comorbidities including:
7.1 Symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Class III-IV); 7.2 Unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months; 7.3 Uncontrolled arrhythmia; 7.4 Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic ≥160 mmHg or diastolic ≥100 mmHg despite standard treatment); 7.5 Active peptic ulcer or gastrointestinal bleeding; 7.6 Active interstitial lung disease or pulmonary fibrosis;
Other malignancy within 5 years (except cured cervical carcinoma in situ, basal cell carcinoma, or squamous cell skin carcinoma);
Live vaccine administration within 4 weeks prior to enrollment or planned during study (inactivated vaccines allowed);
Known hypersensitivity to peptide vaccine components, adjuvants (e.g., Montanide ISA-51, Poly-ICLC), or pembrolizumab;
Sarcomatoid or rhabdoid RCC as predominant histology (mixed histology allowed if non-pure sarcomatoid/rhabdoid);
Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise patient safety or compliance;
Any other condition that the investigator considers unsuitable for study participation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jian Lin, Professor | Contact | +86 1380-1358-465 | linjianbj@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peking University First Hospital | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100034 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37500340 | Background | Plimack ER, Powles T, Stus V, Gafanov R, Nosov D, Waddell T, Alekseev B, Pouliot F, Melichar B, Soulieres D, Borchiellini D, McDermott RS, Vynnychenko I, Chang YH, Tamada S, Atkins MB, Li C, Perini R, Molife LR, Bedke J, Rini BI. Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: 43-month Follow-up of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 Study. Eur Urol. 2023 Nov;84(5):449-454. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jul 25. | |
| 39098455 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
IPD and supporting information will be available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Interested researchers may contact the Principal Investigator or the study team at Peking University First Hospital to submit a data access request. The request should include a detailed research proposal outlining the scientific rationale, specific data requirements, and planned analyses. Access will be granted following review and approval by the study team, subject to compliance with applicable data protection regulations, patient confidentiality agreements, and institutional policies. De-identified individual participant data, along with the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, may be shared via a secure data transfer mechanism. Data access is contingent upon the execution of a data use agreement and is intended solely for non-commercial research purposes.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 29, 2026 | Jun 29, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jun 29, 2026 | Jun 29, 2026 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002292 | Carcinoma, Renal Cell |
| D012008 | Recurrence |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
This is a single-arm, open-label Phase I study with a two-stage enrollment design. All enrolled patients receive the same experimental intervention: personalized neoantigen polyepitope peptide vaccine (Neo-RCC) combined with pembrolizumab. The study includes an initial safety cohort (3 patients) followed by an expansion cohort (5 patients) if dose-limiting toxicity criteria are met. No randomization or control arm is employed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| From first dose through disease progression or death, up to 2 years |
| Duration of Response (DOR) per RECIST v1.1 | Duration of Response (DOR) is defined as the time from first documented CR or PR (whichever occurs first) to first documented disease progression (PD) per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. For patients who have not progressed or died at the time of analysis, DOR is censored at the last tumor assessment date. | From first documented response to disease progression or death, up to 2 years |
| Disease Control Rate (DCR) per RECIST v1.1 | Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the proportion of patients achieving best overall response of complete response(CR), partial response(PR), or stable disease (SD) with duration ≥6 weeks per RECIST v1.1 criteria. | From first dose through 6 weeks after first dose, up to 2 years |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from first dose of study drug to first documented PD per RECIST v1.1 or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Patients who have not progressed or died are censored at the last tumor assessment date. | From first dose to disease progression or death, up to 2 years |
| Overall Survival (OS) | Overall Survival (OS) is defined as the time from first dose of study drug to death from any cause. Patients who are alive at the time of analysis are censored at the last known alive date. | From first dose to death or last contact, up to 2 years |
| Cmax of neoantigen-specific T-cell response | Peak level of neoantigen-specific T-cell response in peripheral blood during treatment, measured by qPCR for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, granzyme B, perforin mRNA expression or TCR clonotype analysis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells(PBMCs) collected at baseline, 24-72 hours post-injection, every 2 treatment cycles, and at treatment completion. | From first dose through 30 days after last dose, approximately 24 weeks |
| Tmax of neoantigen-specific T-cell response | Time from first dose to peak level (Cmax) of neoantigen-specific T-cell response in peripheral blood, measured by qPCR for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, granzyme B, perforin mRNA expression or TCR clonotype analysis. PBMCs collected at baseline, 24-72 hours post-injection, every 2 treatment cycles, and at treatment completion. | From first dose through 30 days after last dose, approximately 24 weeks |
| Duration of neoantigen-specific T-cell response | Time from first detectable neoantigen-specific T-cell response to return to baseline or below threshold, measured by qPCR for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, granzyme B, perforin mRNA expression or TCR clonotype analysis. PBMCs collected at baseline, 24-72 hours post-injection, every 2 treatment cycles, and at treatment completion. | From first dose through 30 days after last dose, approximately 24 weeks |
| Area under curve(AUC) of neoantigen-specific T-cell response | Area under the T-cell response-time curve for neoantigen-specific immune response in peripheral blood, measured by qPCR for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, granzyme B, perforin mRNA expression or TCR clonotype analysis. PBMCs collected at baseline, 24-72 hours post-injection, every 2 treatment cycles, and at treatment completion. | From first dose through 30 days after last dose, approximately 24 weeks |
| Percent change from baseline in neoantigen-specific T-cell response | Percent change from baseline at each timepoint for neoantigen-specific T-cell response in peripheral blood, measured by qPCR for IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, granzyme B, perforin mRNA expression or TCR clonotype analysis. PBMCs collected at baseline, 24-72 hours post-injection, every 2 treatment cycles, and at treatment completion. | From first dose through 30 days after last dose, approximately 24 weeks |
| Background |
| Tannir NM, Albiges L, McDermott DF, Burotto M, Choueiri TK, Hammers HJ, Barthelemy P, Plimack ER, Porta C, George S, Donskov F, Atkins MB, Gurney H, Kollmannsberger CK, Grimm MO, Barrios C, Tomita Y, Castellano D, Grunwald V, Rini BI, Jiang R, Desilva H, Fedorov V, Lee CW, Motzer RJ. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 8-year follow-up results of efficacy and safety from the phase III CheckMate 214 trial. Ann Oncol. 2024 Nov;35(11):1026-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.07.727. Epub 2024 Aug 2. |
| 32673417 | Background | Motzer RJ, Escudier B, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Plimack ER, Procopio G, McDermott DF, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Donskov F, Gurney H, Oudard S, Richardet M, Peltola K, Alva AS, Carducci M, Wagstaff J, Chevreau C, Fukasawa S, Tomita Y, Gauler TC, Kollmannsberger CK, Schutz FA, Larkin J, Cella D, McHenry MB, Saggi SS, Tannir NM. Nivolumab versus everolimus in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Updated results with long-term follow-up of the randomized, open-label, phase 3 CheckMate 025 trial. Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4156-4167. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33033. Epub 2020 Jul 16. |
| 33064988 | Background | Ott PA, Hu-Lieskovan S, Chmielowski B, Govindan R, Naing A, Bhardwaj N, Margolin K, Awad MM, Hellmann MD, Lin JJ, Friedlander T, Bushway ME, Balogh KN, Sciuto TE, Kohler V, Turnbull SJ, Besada R, Curran RR, Trapp B, Scherer J, Poran A, Harjanto D, Barthelme D, Ting YS, Dong JZ, Ware Y, Huang Y, Huang Z, Wanamaker A, Cleary LD, Moles MA, Manson K, Greshock J, Khondker ZS, Fritsch E, Rooney MS, DeMario M, Gaynor RB, Srinivasan L. A Phase Ib Trial of Personalized Neoantigen Therapy Plus Anti-PD-1 in Patients with Advanced Melanoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, or Bladder Cancer. Cell. 2020 Oct 15;183(2):347-362.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.053. |
| 33479501 | Background | Hu Z, Leet DE, Allesoe RL, Oliveira G, Li S, Luoma AM, Liu J, Forman J, Huang T, Iorgulescu JB, Holden R, Sarkizova S, Gohil SH, Redd RA, Sun J, Elagina L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Zhang W, Peter L, Ciantra Z, Rodig S, Olive O, Shetty K, Pyrdol J, Uduman M, Lee PC, Bachireddy P, Buchbinder EI, Yoon CH, Neuberg D, Pentelute BL, Hacohen N, Livak KJ, Shukla SA, Olsen LR, Barouch DH, Wucherpfennig KW, Fritsch EF, Keskin DB, Wu CJ, Ott PA. Personal neoantigen vaccines induce persistent memory T cell responses and epitope spreading in patients with melanoma. Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):515-525. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01206-4. Epub 2021 Jan 21. |
| 28678784 | Background | Sahin U, Derhovanessian E, Miller M, Kloke BP, Simon P, Lower M, Bukur V, Tadmor AD, Luxemburger U, Schrors B, Omokoko T, Vormehr M, Albrecht C, Paruzynski A, Kuhn AN, Buck J, Heesch S, Schreeb KH, Muller F, Ortseifer I, Vogler I, Godehardt E, Attig S, Rae R, Breitkreuz A, Tolliver C, Suchan M, Martic G, Hohberger A, Sorn P, Diekmann J, Ciesla J, Waksmann O, Bruck AK, Witt M, Zillgen M, Rothermel A, Kasemann B, Langer D, Bolte S, Diken M, Kreiter S, Nemecek R, Gebhardt C, Grabbe S, Holler C, Utikal J, Huber C, Loquai C, Tureci O. Personalized RNA mutanome vaccines mobilize poly-specific therapeutic immunity against cancer. Nature. 2017 Jul 13;547(7662):222-226. doi: 10.1038/nature23003. Epub 2017 Jul 5. |
| 28678778 | Background | Ott PA, Hu Z, Keskin DB, Shukla SA, Sun J, Bozym DJ, Zhang W, Luoma A, Giobbie-Hurder A, Peter L, Chen C, Olive O, Carter TA, Li S, Lieb DJ, Eisenhaure T, Gjini E, Stevens J, Lane WJ, Javeri I, Nellaiappan K, Salazar AM, Daley H, Seaman M, Buchbinder EI, Yoon CH, Harden M, Lennon N, Gabriel S, Rodig SJ, Barouch DH, Aster JC, Getz G, Wucherpfennig K, Neuberg D, Ritz J, Lander ES, Fritsch EF, Hacohen N, Wu CJ. An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma. Nature. 2017 Jul 13;547(7662):217-221. doi: 10.1038/nature22991. Epub 2017 Jul 5. |
| 33038342 | Background | Wells DK, van Buuren MM, Dang KK, Hubbard-Lucey VM, Sheehan KCF, Campbell KM, Lamb A, Ward JP, Sidney J, Blazquez AB, Rech AJ, Zaretsky JM, Comin-Anduix B, Ng AHC, Chour W, Yu TV, Rizvi H, Chen JM, Manning P, Steiner GM, Doan XC; Tumor Neoantigen Selection Alliance; Merghoub T, Guinney J, Kolom A, Selinsky C, Ribas A, Hellmann MD, Hacohen N, Sette A, Heath JR, Bhardwaj N, Ramsdell F, Schreiber RD, Schumacher TN, Kvistborg P, Defranoux NA. Key Parameters of Tumor Epitope Immunogenicity Revealed Through a Consortium Approach Improve Neoantigen Prediction. Cell. 2020 Oct 29;183(3):818-834.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Oct 9. |
| 30556813 | Background | Bulik-Sullivan B, Busby J, Palmer CD, Davis MJ, Murphy T, Clark A, Busby M, Duke F, Yang A, Young L, Ojo NC, Caldwell K, Abhyankar J, Boucher T, Hart MG, Makarov V, Montpreville VT, Mercier O, Chan TA, Scagliotti G, Bironzo P, Novello S, Karachaliou N, Rosell R, Anderson I, Gabrail N, Hrom J, Limvarapuss C, Choquette K, Spira A, Rousseau R, Voong C, Rizvi NA, Fadel E, Frattini M, Jooss K, Skoberne M, Francis J, Yelensky R. Deep learning using tumor HLA peptide mass spectrometry datasets improves neoantigen identification. Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Dec 17. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4313. Online ahead of print. |
| 25831525 | Background | Chowell D, Krishna S, Becker PD, Cocita C, Shu J, Tan X, Greenberg PD, Klavinskis LS, Blattman JN, Anderson KS. TCR contact residue hydrophobicity is a hallmark of immunogenic CD8+ T cell epitopes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 7;112(14):E1754-62. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500973112. Epub 2015 Mar 23. |
| 29132146 | Background | Balachandran VP, Luksza M, Zhao JN, Makarov V, Moral JA, Remark R, Herbst B, Askan G, Bhanot U, Senbabaoglu Y, Wells DK, Cary CIO, Grbovic-Huezo O, Attiyeh M, Medina B, Zhang J, Loo J, Saglimbeni J, Abu-Akeel M, Zappasodi R, Riaz N, Smoragiewicz M, Kelley ZL, Basturk O; Australian Pancreatic Cancer Genome Initiative; Garvan Institute of Medical Research; Prince of Wales Hospital; Royal North Shore Hospital; University of Glasgow; St Vincent's Hospital; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute; University of Melbourne, Centre for Cancer Research; University of Queensland, Institute for Molecular Bioscience; Bankstown Hospital; Liverpool Hospital; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse; Westmead Hospital; Fremantle Hospital; St John of God Healthcare; Royal Adelaide Hospital; Flinders Medical Centre; Envoi Pathology; Princess Alexandria Hospital; Austin Hospital; Johns Hopkins Medical Institutes; ARC-Net Centre for Applied Research on Cancer; Gonen M, Levine AJ, Allen PJ, Fearon DT, Merad M, Gnjatic S, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Wolchok JD, DeMatteo RP, Chan TA, Greenbaum BD, Merghoub T, Leach SD. Identification of unique neoantigen qualities in long-term survivors of pancreatic cancer. Nature. 2017 Nov 23;551(7681):512-516. doi: 10.1038/nature24462. Epub 2017 Nov 8. |
| 25245761 | Background | Duan F, Duitama J, Al Seesi S, Ayres CM, Corcelli SA, Pawashe AP, Blanchard T, McMahon D, Sidney J, Sette A, Baker BM, Mandoiu II, Srivastava PK. Genomic and bioinformatic profiling of mutational neoepitopes reveals new rules to predict anticancer immunogenicity. J Exp Med. 2014 Oct 20;211(11):2231-48. doi: 10.1084/jem.20141308. Epub 2014 Sep 22. |
| 29361136 | Background | Ghorani E, Rosenthal R, McGranahan N, Reading JL, Lynch M, Peggs KS, Swanton C, Quezada SA. Differential binding affinity of mutated peptides for MHC class I is a predictor of survival in advanced lung cancer and melanoma. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):271-279. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx687. |
| 24894089 | Background | Fritsch EF, Rajasagi M, Ott PA, Brusic V, Hacohen N, Wu CJ. HLA-binding properties of tumor neoepitopes in humans. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014 Jun;2(6):522-9. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0227. Epub 2014 Mar 3. |
| 32075964 | Background | Kim K, Kim HS, Kim JY, Jung H, Sun JM, Ahn JS, Ahn MJ, Park K, Lee SH, Choi JK. Predicting clinical benefit of immunotherapy by antigenic or functional mutations affecting tumour immunogenicity. Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 19;11(1):951. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14562-z. |
| 31591590 | Background | Yamamoto TN, Kishton RJ, Restifo NP. Developing neoantigen-targeted T cell-based treatments for solid tumors. Nat Med. 2019 Oct;25(10):1488-1499. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0596-y. Epub 2019 Oct 7. |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D007680 | Kidney Neoplasms |
| D014571 | Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |