Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Vanderbilt University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Head and neck cancers have one of the highest recurrence rates among solid malignancies, and recurrence is strongly correlated with overall survival. Reducing recurrence rates depends, in part, on the surgeon's ability to accurately re-resect areas of positive or close margins during surgery. Currently, margin status is communicated primarily through verbal descriptions between the surgeon and pathologist, which can be imprecise. This challenge is further compounded by the deformable nature of soft tissues, as once the specimen is resected, the shape and size of the specimen change, making it difficult to accurately map the specimen's margins back onto the surgical site.
Emerging technologies -such as augmented reality (AR), 3D scanning, and advanced soft tissue modeling- offer promising solutions for improving surgical navigation and precision. Building on these advances, an AR-based surgical navigation system was developed specifically for head and neck tumor resections. The system uses a 3D scanner to generate virtual models of both the resected specimen and the patient's surgical site, as demonstrated in prior work. A soft tissue modeling algorithm is then applied to account for specimen shrinkage and deformation, enabling accurate tracking of positive tumor margins. This guidance information is visualized through an AR headset, which overlays the margin data directly onto the patient's surgical site, providing surgeons with real-time visual guidance during re-resection.
In this study, the goal is to evaluate the benefits and usability of this novel navigation software, compared to the standard of care. By assessing surgeon performance and user experience in cadaveric tasks with and without the AR system to identify strengths, limitations, and opportunities for refinement of the system, ultimately advancing surgical precision and improving patient outcomes by reducing recurrence rates.
Augmented reality (AR) technology, combined with computer vision algorithms, offers significant potential to enhance surgical visualization by generating GPS-like spatial maps over the patient's anatomy. This study aims to evaluate the usability and impact of our AR surgical guidance system, delivered through Microsoft HoloLens 2 (or equivalent AR/VR goggles such as Magic Leap or Apple Vision Pro), among surgeons while they complete various surgical tasks on cadaveric specimens. Specifically, an assessment of how the AR system influences surgeon performance and user experience during tasks such as suturing and specimen relocation, performed both with and without AR assistance.
Task accuracy (e.g., resection precision) will be measured and survey responses will be collected to assess the system's usability, ease of use, and comfort. Building on prior work where the investigators validated the feasibility and accuracy of AR-guided surgical holograms, this study focuses on advancing the evaluation of the system's usability and impact on performance. The goal is to generate insights into the application of AR guidance in head and neck tumor resection, ultimately contributing to improved intraoperative surgical precision and patient outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Augmented Reality (AR) | Participants will be asked to localize simulated margins on tissue resection beds on a fresh-frozen cadaver head. Specimens of skin, buccal, or tongue tissue will be resected by the research team beforehand. Participants will be asked to place pins or stitches where the indicated targets are located. These positions will be recorded by the research team. Participants will first receive oral guidance only, corresponding to common descriptions between pathologists and surgeons. Participants will then reproduce the same task with AR guidance. In this case, the target will be displayed in the see-through AR headset. The target will be overlaid on the resection bed site and follow your head's movements. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Augmented Reality | Other | Task accuracy will be evaluated by measuring distances between the points identified with and without AR guidance, and the pathologist-intended target locations. Participants will then complete post-tasks surveys and interviews. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Task accuracy (e.g., resection precision) | Surgeon performance of target re-localization compared with and without the AR-headset. | within 90 minutes of AR-guided use |
| User Experience | Assess AR usability, ease of use, and comfort, through surgeon feedback surveys | immediately after the AR-guided task. |
| Accuracy of overlay alignment | This will validate the accuracy of overlay alignment through landmark-based (tumor margin relocation) error metrics, which support precision of re-resection tasks. | within 90 minutes of completing the AR-guided task. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Non-physician surgery providers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Surgeon-physician, surgical fellow, or post-graduate year 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 (PGY2-5) resident physicians
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jie Ying Wu Assistant Professor of Computer Science, PhD | Contact | 615-343-4996 | JieYing.Wu@vanderbilt.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Topf, MD | Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Recruiting | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
NIH requires through Data Management and Sharing Plans (DMSP) that all data collected during the research project be archived indefinitely and shared with the community after the project termination. De-identified data will then be transferred to Open Science Framework (OSF).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided