Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Caregivers provide essential support for people living with advanced heart or lung disease, including daily tasks, emotional support, and help with medical care. Although their role is vital, caregivers often experience high levels of stress, fatigue, and challenges with their own health and well-being. This study will test whether it is possible and practical to offer an 8-week wellness program for caregivers that is delivered virtually in their homes. The program includes personalized strategies for physical activity or exercise, healthy eating, and stress management. It will be tailored to the individual needs and schedules of caregivers and supported by regular virtual check-ins with health professionals. We will evaluate whether caregivers find the program acceptable, safe, and feasible to follow. This includes looking at how many caregivers agree to participate, how many complete the program, whether they can follow the activities, and whether they are satisfied with the experience. The study will also explore whether participating in the program may lead to improvements in caregiver quality of life, stress, and confidence in the caregiving role.
Caregivers of people with advanced cardiac or pulmonary disease play a critical role in supporting patients' health. Their responsibilities often include transportation, managing appointments, grocery shopping, personal care, and emotional support. This role, while essential, is demanding and has been associated with higher levels of stress, lower physical activity, sleep disruption, and worse quality of life among caregivers. Over time, these challenges can negatively impact both the caregiver's own health and their ability to continue providing support.
Most existing wellness or rehabilitation programs focus on the patient rather than the caregiver. As a result, caregivers have limited access to structured support designed specifically for their own health needs. Previous research conducted by our group in patients with advanced disease and transplant recipients has shown that virtual programs combining exercise, nutrition counselling, and stress management are feasible, safe, and acceptable. These programs were able to improve aspects of physical and emotional well-being, demonstrating that remotely delivered interventions can be effective in populations with significant health challenges.
Given this evidence, it is important to extend support directly to caregivers, who are often overlooked despite being at high risk for stress-related health problems. Addressing this gap has the potential to improve both caregiver outcomes and the care they provide to patients.
We are testing a flexible, home-based wellness program designed to support the physical and emotional well-being of caregivers of people living with serious heart or lung disease. This study will look at whether the program is practical to deliver, whether caregivers are able to follow it, and whether it shows signs of being helpful. This information will help us decide if it is worth doing a larger study in the future. We will also look at how the program affects caregivers' quality of life, mental health, and their relationship with the person they care for. In addition, caregivers and patients will have the option to share their experiences in interviews, which may take place before, during, or up to approximately 4 weeks after the program.
This study will examine whether it is feasible to recruit and retain caregivers into an 8-week, home-based wellness program and whether caregivers can safely participate in the intervention. We expect that caregivers will find the program acceptable and that it will be possible to deliver physical activity, nutrition counselling, and stress management strategies in a virtual format. In addition, the study will explore preliminary signals of benefit, including improvements in caregiver quality of life, stress, and psychosocial well-being. Finally, exploratory qualitative interviews will examine whether supporting caregivers in this way may also influence patient experiences and the caregiver-patient relationship.
Primary Objective 1: To evaluate the feasibility of delivering an 8-week, individualized, home-based wellness program for caregivers of people with advanced heart or lung disease who are receiving outpatient palliative care.
Measurement 1: Feasibility will be assessed by looking at how many people are recruited and agree to participate, how many caregivers complete at least 70% of the program activities, how many remain in the study at 8 weeks, whether any safety concerns or serious side effects occur, and how satisfied participants are with the program (measured through questionnaires).
Secondary Objective 1: To assess early indications of whether the program may improve caregivers' health-related quality of life, physical function, and psychological well-being (including anxiety, depression, and perceived stress), as well as the quality of the caregiver-patient relationship.
Measurement 1: Changes from the start of the study to weeks 4 and 8 will be assessed using validated questionnaires, including the Short-Form 36 (SF-36), the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21), the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the Preparation for Caregiving Scale.
Secondary Objective 2: To explore caregiver and patient experiences with the program.
Measurement 2: Optional semi-structured interviews will be conducted with caregivers and, if they agree, with patients, at flexible time points-before the program starts, during the 8-week intervention, or up to 4 weeks after the program is finished.
This study will determine if a virtual caregiver wellness program is feasible and safe. If successful, it will fill a major gap in care by directly supporting caregivers, who are often overlooked. The anticipated benefits include reduced caregiver stress, improved quality of life, and stronger caregiver-patient relationships. In the long term, caregiver well-being may also improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare burden.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal Caregiver Well-being Intervention | Experimental | The intervention in this study is an 8-week, individualized, home-based Multimodal Caregiver Wellness Program, which includes three core components: flexible physical activity or exercise program tailored to the goals of caregivers, nutritional counselling (interventional group only), and stress management strategies delivered through the exercise professional and dietician. |
|
| Usual care | No Intervention | The usual care group will recieive the UHN caregiver resource pamphlet and standard caregiver resources offered at UHN such as access to social work, psychology, and palliative care support as needed. | |
| Patients (Optional) | No Intervention | Up to 40 patients known to the caregivers will be invited to participate in the study to complete questionnaires and will have the option of participating in a qualitative interview. Patients will not receive any intervention. Patient participation is optional and not required for caregiver enrollment in the study. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Multimodal Well-being Program | Behavioral | The multimodal caregiver wellness Program includes three core components: flexible physical activity or exercise program tailored to the goals of caregivers, nutritional counselling, and stress management strategies delivered through the exercise professional and registered dietician. Participants will be encouraged to engage in aerobic exercise, with a goal of gradually increasing activity levels toward guideline-based targets, complemented by resistance training or other preferred forms of physical activity. The nutritional component includes one individualized 45-60-minute counselling session with a registered dietitian, based on a brief nutrition screening tool tailored to the caregiver's health needs. Participants may request follow-up support throughout the intervention period. Stress management is embedded based on participant availability, interactions with the exercise professional, and focusing on integrating simple stress-reduction strategies into daily routines. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Study Recruitment According to Research Team Records | Recruitment-success percentage in the study will be assessed based on research team study records. | Over study recruitment period (approximately 15 months) |
| Study Consent Rates According to Research Team Records | Consent-success percentage in the study and reasons for declining participation will be assessed based on research team study records. | Over study recruitment period (approximately 15 months) |
| Self-Reported Adherence to Multimodal Well-being Program According to Participant Logs (Intervention Group Only) | Program adherence will be monitored through participant-led tracking tools, periodic communications with the exercise professional, review of exercise and activity logs completed by participants (including exercise type, frequency, and perceived exertion), and use of Fitbit activity trackers (caregivers only). Adherence will be defined as the completion of at least ≥ 70% of the intervention components, including aerobic and resistance exercise, engagement with nutritional counselling, and participation in stress reduction strategies. | During the study intervention period (approximately 15 months) |
| Safety Assessed Via Self-Reported Adverse Events | Safety will be assessed via self-reported adverse events documented in exercise logs and verified during weekly virtual check-ins. Participants will be explicitly instructed to report any adverse events immediately, even outside scheduled sessions, to ensure timely assessment and response by the research team | During the study intervention period (approximately 15 months) |
| Participant Retention in the Study According to Research Team Records | Participant retention will be assessed by measuring participant follow-up throughout the study period, according to research team records. A retention rate of 80% or greater (in each group) has been established as the criteria to determine study feasibility. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by Short-Form 36 Questionnaire (All Caregivers and Patients) | Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) will be assessed through the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Questionnaire. This generic health instrument is widely employed and comprises 8 health domains, with two summary scores (physical and mental), ranging from 0 to 100. It assesses quality of life and has normative values of 50, with a minimal important difference (MID) of 5 points. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Qualitative Interview (Optional) | A subset of caregiver and patient participants will be invited to participate in an optional qualitative semi-structured interview at flexible time points before, during, or up to approximately 4 weeks after the study period. | Before, during, or up to approximately 4 weeks after the study period. |
INCLUSION CRITERIA (CAREGIVERS):
EXCLUSION CRITERIA (CAREGIVERS):
INCLUSION CRITERIA (Patients):
EXCLUSION CRITERIA (Patients):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dmitry Rozenberg, MD, PhD | Contact | 416-340-4800 | 7358 | Dmitry.Rozenberg@uhn.ca |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2C4 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27617564 | Background | Bidwell JT, Lyons KS, Lee CS. Caregiver Well-being and Patient Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017 Jul/Aug;32(4):372-382. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000350. | |
| 15689302 | Background | Ullrich G, Jansch H, Schmidt S, Struber M, Niedermeyer J. The experience of the support person involved in a lung transplant programme: results of a pilot study. Eur J Med Res. 2004 Dec 22;9(12):555-652. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Single-centre, open-label, parallel-arm feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Over the study data collection period (approximately 15 months) |
| Satisfaction Questionnaire (Intervention Group Only) | Participant satisfaction and barriers to engagement in the intervention will be determined using a satisfaction questionnaire. | After the 8-week intervention period. |
| Change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention start. |
| Mood Assessed by Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (All Caregivers and Patients) | The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) questionnaire has 21 items to assess mood (anxiety, depression, and stress). Each statement for the three domains is given a score of 0 (not applicable) to 3 (applicable most of the time) with scores categorized as follows: Normal, Mild, Moderate, Severe, and Extremely Severe. | Change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention start. |
| Stress Assessed by Perceived Stress Scale (All Caregivers and Patients) | Stress will be assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale. This is a commonly used tool for assessing psychological stress, measuring the degree to which life situations are unpredictable or overwhelming. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating increased stress | Change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention start. |
| Advanced Care Planning Assessed by Preparedness for Caregivers Scale (Caregiver Arms Only) | Caregiver readiness to handle the caregiving role will be assessed by the Preparedness for Caregivers Scale. This is a brief self-report tool used to assess how well informal caregivers feel prepared to provide care across multiple domains, including physical and emotional support, managing stress, and navigating healthcare systems. It consists of 8 items rated on a scale from 0 (not at all prepared) to 4 (very well prepared). The final score is the mean of all items answered, ranging from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater perceived preparedness for caregiving. | Change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention start. |
| Nutrition Assessed by Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (Caregiver Arms Only) | The Rapid Eating Assessment for Participants (REAP) will be administered to assess participants' dietary habits and guide nutrition counselling. | Change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention start. |
| Physical Activity and Exercise Behaviors Assessed by International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Caregiver Arms Only) | The International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF) will be used to measure physical activity levels in study participants. The questionnaire consists of seven questions to capture average daily time spent sitting, walking, and engaging in moderate and vigorous physical activity over the last seven days. The IPAQ-SF provides an overall physical activity level of participants based on their Metabolic Equivalent Task minutes per week. | Change from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks after intervention start. |
| Physical Activity Levels Assessed by Fitbit Device (Caregiver Arms Only) | Participants' physical activity levels will be assessed by tracking the number of daily steps continuously over the 8-week study period, using a Fitbit device. Participants will also be encouraged to "start" and "stop" activities on the Fitbit when possible to improve accuracy of activity tracking. | Over the 8-week study period (from randomization to end of study period) |
| 17988265 | Background | Rodrigue JR, Baz MA. Waiting for lung transplantation: quality of life, mood, caregiving strain and benefit, and social intimacy of spouses. Clin Transplant. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):722-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2007.00729.x. |
| 15748679 | Background | Myaskovsky L, Dew MA, Switzer GE, McNulty ML, DiMartini AF, McCurry KR. Quality of life and coping strategies among lung transplant candidates and their family caregivers. Soc Sci Med. 2005 May;60(10):2321-32. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.10.001. Epub 2004 Dec 15. |
| 25709429 | Background | Miravitlles M, Pena-Longobardo LM, Oliva-Moreno J, Hidalgo-Vega A. Caregivers' burden in patients with COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Feb 12;10:347-56. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S76091. eCollection 2015. |
| 35938489 | Background | Suksatan W, Tankumpuan T, Davidson PM. Heart Failure Caregiver Burden and Outcomes: A Systematic Review. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221112584. doi: 10.1177/21501319221112584. |
| 26767785 | Background | Krug K, Miksch A, Peters-Klimm F, Engeser P, Szecsenyi J. Correlation between patient quality of life in palliative care and burden of their family caregivers: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jan 15;15:4. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0082-y. |
| 33478890 | Background | Semere W, Althouse AD, Rosland AM, White D, Arnold R, Chu E, Smith TJ, Schenker Y. Poor patient health is associated with higher caregiver burden for older adults with advanced cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Jun;12(5):771-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 18. |