Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The FUNGAL-P study is a single-center observational study designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction score for the early identification of fungal pneumonia in adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
The study includes a retrospective derivation cohort and a prospective validation cohort of patients undergoing microbiological evaluation of lower respiratory tract samples. Clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, and treatment-related variables associated with fungal pneumonia will be analyzed to identify independent predictors of fungal infection. These predictors will be combined to develop the FUNGAL-P score.
The derived score will subsequently be evaluated in a prospective validation cohort to assess its diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility. The ultimate goal is to facilitate earlier recognition of fungal pneumonia and support timely diagnostic testing and antifungal treatment in patients presenting to the Emergency Department or hospital with pneumonia.
Fungal pneumonia is an increasingly recognized cause of severe respiratory infection and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis remains challenging because clinical manifestations are often nonspecific and conventional diagnostic criteria may not be readily applicable in emergency care settings. Delayed recognition may result in delayed diagnostic investigations and initiation of targeted antifungal therapy.
The FUNGAL-P study is a no-profit, single-center observational study conducted at Careggi University Hospital (Florence, Italy). The study was designed to derive and validate a clinical prediction rule for the early identification of fungal pneumonia or fungal-bacterial coinfection among adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
The study consists of two sequential phases.
Retrospective derivation phase
The derivation cohort includes adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pneumonia diagnosed between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023. Eligible patients underwent bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial aspirate, or endotracheal aspirate collection within 48 hours of hospital presentation. Microbiological investigations included fungal and bacterial cultures, galactomannan testing, molecular assays for Aspergillus species and Pneumocystis jirovecii, and multiplex molecular respiratory pathogen testing.
Patients with microbiologically confirmed fungal pneumonia constituted the study group, whereas patients with bacterial or viral pneumonia served as controls. Cases of fungal-bacterial coinfection were classified as fungal pneumonia. Patients without microbiological identification of a pathogen were excluded.
Prospective validation phase
The validation cohort includes consecutive adult patients with pneumonia enrolled between January 1, 2024 and December 31, 2024. Patients underwent routine microbiological investigations according to standard clinical practice. The performance of the derived FUNGAL-P score was evaluated prospectively without influencing clinical decision-making.
Outcome definition
The primary study outcome is fungal pneumonia, including infections caused by Aspergillus species, Pneumocystis jirovecii, and other fungal pathogens, as well as fungal-bacterial coinfections. Diagnosis is based on an integrated assessment of clinical presentation, radiological findings, microbiological results, fungal biomarkers, and molecular testing results. Final case adjudication includes review of clinical follow-up data, imaging studies, microbiological findings, and treatment decisions.
Data collection
Demographic characteristics, medical history, comorbidities, fungal infection risk factors, vital signs, laboratory findings, radiological data, microbiological results, administered treatments, and clinical outcomes are collected for all participants.
Statistical analysis
Independent predictors of fungal pneumonia are identified using multivariable logistic regression. Candidate variables are selected based on prior evidence and univariable analyses. Predictors retained in the final model are incorporated into the FUNGAL-P score. Diagnostic performance is evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and area under the ROC curve (AUROC). Calibration is assessed using calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. Internal validation is performed using bootstrap resampling, and clinical utility is evaluated through decision curve analysis.
Primary Objective
To derive a clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia or fungal-bacterial coinfection in adult patients presenting with pneumonia.
Secondary Objectives
To prospectively validate the FUNGAL-P score. To assess score calibration and discrimination. To determine sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.
To evaluate the clinical utility of the score for identifying patients at increased risk of fungal pneumonia.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Retrospective Derivation Cohort | Adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pneumonia enrolled at Careggi University Hospital between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023. Clinical, laboratory, radiological, microbiological, treatment, and outcome data were collected to identify independent predictors of fungal pneumonia and to derive the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score. |
| |
| Prospective Validation Cohort | Consecutive adult patients with pneumonia enrolled at Careggi University Hospital between 13 nov, 2025 and December 31, 2030. The cohort was used to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance, calibration, and clinical utility of the derived FUNGAL-P score without influencing clinical management. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FUNGAL-P Score Assessment | Other | Observational assessment of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and microbiological variables used to derive and validate the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score for fungal pneumonia. No study-specific intervention was performed and patient management was not influenced by the study. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FUNGAL-P score | Evaluation of the discriminative ability of the FUNGAL-P score for identifying fungal pneumonia. | At completion of study analysis (30 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of the FUNGAL-P score | Evaluation of the discriminative ability of the FUNGAL-P score for identifying fungal pneumonia. | At completion of study analysis (30 days) |
| Sensitivity and specificity of the FUNGAL-P score |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients presenting with pneumonia at Careggi University Hospital who underwent microbiological evaluation of lower respiratory tract samples, including bronchoalveolar lavage, bronchial aspirate, or endotracheal aspirate, within 48 hours of hospital presentation. The study population includes patients with microbiologically confirmed fungal, bacterial, or viral pneumonia enrolled in retrospective and prospective cohorts for derivation and validation of the FUNGAL-P clinical prediction score.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Pelagatti, MD, PhDs | Contact | +39 3385917317 | pelagattil@aou-careggi.toscana.it | |
| Peiman Nazerian, MD | Contact | nazierianp@aou-careggi.toscana.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lorenzo Pelagatti, MD, PhD | University of Florence | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Careggi University Hospital | Recruiting | Florence | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1. Esandi M, Magnasco L, Farina EC, et al. Early diagnosis of candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: prospective study. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29(9):1534-1540. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-1825-3 2. Wang K, Wang Y, Liu M, et al. Retrospective evaluation of risk factors for invasive Candida infections in a medical ICU. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(14):e38338. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000038338 3. Kullberg BJ, Arendrup MC. Invasive candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1445-1456. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1315399 4. Playford EG, Eggimann P, Calandra T, et al. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(12):775-784. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70267-7 5. Leroy G, Lambiotte F, Thévenin D, et al. Risk factors of invasive fungal disease in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2012;16(5):R242. doi:10.1186/cc11844 6. Aguilar C, Kumar D, Humar A, et al. Risk factors for invasive fungal infections in lung transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Transplant. 2021;35(4):e14232. doi:10.1111/ctr.14232 7. Li Y, Wang J, Zhang H, et al. A novel scoring system to predict invasive candidiasis in immunocompetent critically ill patients. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1097574. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1097574 8. Bougnoux ME, Kac G, Aegerter P, et al. Candidemia and Candida colonization in critically ill patients: incidence and risk factors. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(11):1955-1961. doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1197-4 9. Bassetti M, Righi E, Ansaldi F, et al. A multicenter study of candidemia in intensive care units in Italy. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(10):1523-1529. doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0298-8 10. Blot SI, Taccone FS, Van den Abeele AM, et al. A clinical algorithm to diagnose invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(9):1294-1303. doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2600-5 11. Lu LY, Cheng Y, Wang H, et al. Risk factors and outcomes of influenza |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the FUNGAL-P score at predefined score thresholds. |
| At completion of study analysis (30 days) |
| Calibration of the FUNGAL-P score | Assessment of agreement between predicted and observed probabilities of fungal pneumonia using calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. | At completion of study analysis (30 days) |
| Clinical utility of the FUNGAL-P score | Evaluation of the net clinical benefit of the FUNGAL-P score using Decision Curve Analysis. | At completion of study analysis (30 days) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011014 | Pneumonia |
| D055732 | Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
| D055744 | Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis |
| D011020 | Pneumonia, Pneumocystis |
| D009181 | Mycoses |
| D060085 | Coinfection |
| D000098968 | Community-Acquired Pneumonia |
| D004630 | Emergencies |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007239 | Infections |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D001228 | Aspergillosis |
| D001423 | Bacterial Infections and Mycoses |
| D008172 | Lung Diseases, Fungal |
| D000072742 | Invasive Fungal Infections |
| D016720 | Pneumocystis Infections |
| D017714 | Community-Acquired Infections |
| D020969 | Disease Attributes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided