Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Single-center, cross-sectional observational study assessing the feasibility of advanced accelerated MRI sequences versus standard ones in terms of image quality, diagnostic reliability, and acquisition time.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Image quality | Comparison between standard and accelerated MRI sequences in terms of diagnostic accuracy, acquisition time. | 30 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Image quality - subjective | Likert-scale evaluation of images between independent readers with different levvels of experience | 30-36 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
At least 50% male population
Not provided
Consecutive adults (≥18 years) admitted to the Advanced Imaging for Personalized Medicine Unit for screening WB-MRI, including a male subgroup undergoing prostate-focused imaging to rule out malignancy. Subjects refusing consent, with claustrophobia, or with metallic implants compromising image quality are excluded.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antonio Esposito, Medicine and Surgery | Contact | +390226436185 | esposito.antonio@unisr.it |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41374407 | Background | Kim BK, Kim JS, Lee HJ, Lee JK, Lee HA, Pak S. Low- Versus High-Concentration Iodine Contrast for Hepatic Multiphase CT in Chronic Liver Disease: Image Quality, Lesion Detectability, and Iodine Load Reduction with Modern MDCT-A Retrospective Non-Inferiority Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Nov 27;15(23):3026. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15233026. | |
| 36841743 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Breit HC, Vosshenrich J, Hofmann V, Rusche T, Kovacs BK, Bach M, Manneck S, Harder D. Image Quality of Lumbar Spine Imaging at 0.55T Low-Field MRI is Comparable to Conventional 1.5T MRI - Initial Observations in Healthy Volunteers. Acad Radiol. 2023 Nov;30(11):2440-2446. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.037. Epub 2023 Feb 24. |
| 41186470 | Background | Haller S, Hedderich D, Federau C, Weisstanner C, Edjlali M, Cauter SV, Zaharchuk G. The Current Status of AI-accelerated MRI Techniques in Clinical Use. Radiology. 2025 Nov;317(2):e243819. doi: 10.1148/radiol.243819. |
| 37027426 | Background | Li C, Lei S, Ding L, Xu Y, Wu X, Wang H, Zhang Z, Gao T, Zhang Y, Li L. Global burden and trends of lung cancer incidence and mortality. Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Jul 5;136(13):1583-1590. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002529. |
| 35900614 | Background | Rata M, Blackledge M, Scurr E, Winfield J, Koh DM, Dragan A, Candito A, King A, Rennie W, Gaba S, Suresh P, Malcolm P, Davis A, Nilak A, Shah A, Gandhi S, Albrizio M, Drury A, Roberts S, Jenner M, Brown S, Kaiser M, Messiou C. Implementation of Whole-Body MRI (MY-RADS) within the OPTIMUM/MUKnine multi-centre clinical trial for patients with myeloma. Insights Imaging. 2022 Jul 28;13(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01253-0. |
| 33904776 | Background | Petralia G, Koh DM, Attariwala R, Busch JJ, Eeles R, Karow D, Lo GG, Messiou C, Sala E, Vargas HA, Zugni F, Padhani AR. Oncologically Relevant Findings Reporting and Data System (ONCO-RADS): Guidelines for the Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-Body MRI for Cancer Screening. Radiology. 2021 Jun;299(3):494-507. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021201740. Epub 2021 Apr 27. |