Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compared the impact of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) versus standart laboratory practice (SLP) on nursing students' knowledge, psychomotor skills, learning satisfaction, and self-confidence within a childhood vaccination training.
This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) versus standard laboratory practice (SLP) on nursing students' knowledge, psychomotor skills, satisfaction, and self-confidence in childhood vaccination training. A total of 122 fourth-year nursing students were randomly assigned to HFS or SLP groups; 104 completed the study.
All participants received the same theoretical training on childhood immunization. The HFS group participated in a simulation scenario involving vaccine hesitancy, while the SLP group performed traditional laboratory-based practice on a manikin.
Knowledge was assessed using a pre-test, post-test at 1 hour, and a one-month follow-up test. Skills were evaluated immediately after the intervention. Satisfaction and self-confidence were also measured post-intervention.
The primary outcomes were knowledge and skill performance, while secondary outcomes included satisfaction and self-confidence. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-Fidelity Simulation Group (HFS) | Experimental | The HFS intervention was developed in accordance with INACSL Healthcare Simulation Standards and validated by six nursing experts. All participants first received a standardized 100-minute childhood vaccination training consisting of theoretical instruction and laboratory practice. The simulation session included a 10-minute briefing, a 20-minute high-fidelity scenario involving a vaccine-hesitant mother, and a 30-minute structured debriefing using the PEARLS framework. During the simulation, students were required to assess parental concerns, provide education, safely administer vaccines, and complete documentation. The debriefing process included reflection and analysis through structured phases to enhance learning outcomes. |
|
| Standard Laboratory Practice Group (SLP) | Active Comparator | The SLP group received the identical 100-minute theoretical and practical training session. One week later, instead of a structured simulation, they participated in a 20-minute individual skills session in the nursing fundamentals laboratory. Each student independently performed the vaccination procedure on a baby manikin and verbally described the parent education they would provide. Following their session, each student also participated in an individual, video-assisted PEARLS debriefing focused on their technical performance and communication description. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-Fidelity Simulation | Behavioral | High-fidelity simulation-based training including a vaccine hesitancy scenario, structured briefing, simulation, and debriefing. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Childhood Immunization Knowledge Test (CIKT) | A 10-item multiple-choice test developed by the researchers based on national guidelines and literature. Each correct answer is scored as 10 points. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of childhood immunization. Expert validation was obtained, and the KR-20 reliability coefficient was 0.93. | Baseline, 1 hour after training, and 1 month after training |
| Pediatric Intramuscular Vaccination Administration Checklist (PIVAC) | Items are scored from 0 (not performed) to 2 (performed). Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better pediatric intramuscular vaccination administration skills. The checklist demonstrated expert validity and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90. | 1 hour after training |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS) | A validated 12-item, 5-point Likert scale with two subscales (Satisfaction and Self-Confidence). Total scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. In this study, Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 for the satisfaction subscale, 0.94 for the self-confidence subscale, and 0.96 for the total scale. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University | Kozlu | Zonguldak Province | 67600 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Result | Nelson, B., Ridgway, J., Brown, A., Anthamatten, A., Hall, E., & McClure, N. (2025). Interactive simulation for addressing vaccine hesitancy in nurse practitioner education. Clinical Simulation in Nursing,102, 101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101719 | ||
| 37657119 | Result | Hekel BE, Dugger J, Pullis BR, Cron S, Edwards AP. Vaccine Hesitancy: Developing Competency in Nursing Students Through Simulation. Nurse Educ. 2024 Mar-Apr 01;49(2):E62-E67. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001505. Epub 2023 Sep 1. | |
| 32578755 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000088823 | Vaccination Hesitancy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072758 | Vaccination Refusal |
| D016312 | Treatment Refusal |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Experimental Group: High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) Control Group: Standard Laboratory Practice (SLP)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Standard Laboratory Practice | Behavioral | Traditional laboratory-based vaccination training using a manikin without a structured simulation scenario. |
|
| 1 hour after training |
| Simulation Design Scale (SDS) | The Simulation Design Scale consists of 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating a more positive evaluation of the simulation design. Cronbach's alpha was 0.98. | 1 hour after training |
| Result |
| Costa RRO, Medeiros SM, Martins JCA, Coutinho VRD, Araujo MS. Effectiveness of simulation in teaching immunization in nursing: a randomized clinical trial. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Jun 19;28:e3305. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3147.3305. eCollection 2020. |
| D001519 | Behavior |