Abstract Objective:

The aim of this study is to compare two different ways of adjusting the air-filled cushion (cuff) of the breathing tube used during general anesthesia in children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (closed surgery for appendicitis). The goal is to see if maintaining the pressure in this cushion within a safe, specific range (15-18 mmHg) helps prevent or reduce sore throat, hoarseness, and discomfort, which are common postoperative complications in children.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Sixty children aged 6 to 18 years scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy will be included. Participants will be randomly assigned to two equal groups: Group A (Control Group): Breathing tube cuff pressure is adjusted using the standard "feeling" (finger palpation) method common in routine practice. Group B (Intervention Group): Breathing tube cuff pressure is measured throughout the surgery using a medical pressure sensor (manometer) and maintained within a safe range (15-18 mmHg). Research Questions: Does actively monitoring airway pressure reduce the number of children experiencing postoperative sore throat? Does this method reduce the severity of sore throat, cough, hoarseness, or other respiratory discomfort compared to the standard method? What will happen?

During surgery, respiratory and heart rate measurements will be recorded every 15 minutes for all participants. After surgery, researchers will visit participants (and their parents) at 2, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively to assess the presence of sore throat, discomfort, or hoarseness. No additional medications or invasive procedures will be used for this study; only how we manage airway pressure will be compared.

Endotracheal tube (ETT) placement is a critical component of pediatric general anesthesia. In pediatric patients, the tracheal mucosa is highly sensitive to pressure. If the ETT cuff pressure exceeds the mucosal capillary perfusion pressure, it can lead to ischemic damage and subsequent postoperative airway morbidities such as postoperative sore throat (POST), cough, and hoarseness.

During laparoscopic surgeries such as appendectomy, the creation of pneumoperitoneum and the necessary surgical positioning increase intra-abdominal and intrathoracic pressures. These physiological changes dynamically increase the peak airway pressure (Ppeak) and the corresponding ETT cuff pressure, making optimal cuff pressure management clinically challenging.

Traditionally, cuff pressure is subjectively adjusted by the anesthesiologist using a pilot balloon palpation technique. However, evidence suggests that this method often leads to undetectable and unsafe high pressures. Alternatively, continuous objective monitoring of endotracheal tube (ETT) cuff pressure using an invasive arterial blood pressure transducer setup offers a real-time method for maintaining pressure within a safe physiological range (15-18 mmHg).

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to investigate whether continuous objective monitoring and titration of ETT cuff pressure via a pressure transducer, compared to conventional subjective palpation, can optimize intraoperative respiratory mechanics and reduce the frequency and severity of postoperative upper respiratory tract complications in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Pediatric patients aged 6-18 years
• Patients with ASA physical status classification I-III
• Patients scheduled for laparoscopic appendectomy
• Voluntary written informed consent from the patient's legal guardian/parent after being informed in detail about the purpose and method of the study..

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients under 6 years of age
• Patients with ASA IV or higher
• Patients with preoperative sore throat
• Patients who have not completed the preoperative fasting period
• Patients who received intraoperative nasogastric tube
• Patients who received intraoperative N₂O
• Patients with complicated appendicitis diagnosis
• Patients who underwent two or more intubation attempts
• Patients with surgery duration longer than 2 hours
• Patients with predicted or likely airway difficulties
• Patients who underwent conversion from intraoperative laparoscopy to laparotomy
• Presence of tracheal pathology
• Congenital anomalies affecting the airway
• Presence of known upper/lower respiratory tract disease
• Patients requiring planned postoperative mechanical ventilation
• Patients in shock
• Patients with decompensated heart failure or respiratory failure
• Patient or legal representative's refusal to participate in the study
• Patients with a history of smoking

The individual participant data collected during the study are considered confidential institutional data according to the study protocol and informed consent forms approved by the local ethics committee. The data will only be available to authorized regulatory bodies and the investigation team to ensure participant privacy and data security.

This study employs a single-blind design. The attending anesthesiologist performing the intraoperative procedure and data collection is aware of the group assignment (unmasked) to ensure correct intervention and monitoring. The principal investigator, who conducts all postoperative follow-up assessments, including sore throat scoring and airway complication evaluations, remains blinded to the patient's group allocation (masked) to prevent observer bias.