Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study seeks to address the identified research gap by objectively investigating the effect of Mulligan Cervical SNAGs on postural stability in individuals with chronic neck pain and mobility impairments. The findings aim to provide evidence-based insights into whether restoring joint mobility through this manual intervention can effectively enhance sensorimotor control and balance performance. The study aims to determine if adding SNAG to a conventional exercise program provides superior improvements in balance indices (OSI, APSI, MLSI), Pain, functional disability, Range of motion, Joint position sense, and kinesiophobia compared to exercise alone. The primary purpose of this study is to answer the following research questions:
Chronic neck pain associated with mobility deficits is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that extends beyond localized discomfort to involve significant sensorimotor disturbances. The cervical spine plays a pivotal role in postural control due to its high density of mechanoreceptors and its intricate integration with the vestibular and visual systems. Patients with CNP frequently exhibit impaired proprioception and increased postural sway. This leads to a higher risk of falls and functional limitations. If SNAG is proven effective, the results will help clinicians justify the inclusion of Mulligan SNAGs in rehabilitation protocols not only to restore mobility and reduce pain but also to address balance impairments and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain. From a patient perspective, these improvements may enhance functional performance, confidence during movement, and quality of life. From a socioeconomic perspective, improving functional abilities and reducing disability may decrease healthcare costs, work absenteeism, and the long-term burden associated with chronic neck pain. Scientifically, this study may contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the sensorimotor and balance-related effects of Mulligan SNAG techniques and provide further insight into the relationship between cervical mobility, postural stability, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A will include 22 patients with chronic neck pain with mobility deficits | Experimental | Group A (Experimental: Mulligan cervical SNAG plus conventional physiotherapy) (Mulligan Cervical SNAG Plus Conventional Therapy) Mulligan Cervical SNAG Technique Protocol:
|
|
| Group B = 22 patients with chronic neck pain with mobility deficits | Other | Control Group (Conventional Therapy Only)
Protocol structure:
Typical regimen:
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1- The Biodex Balance System (BBS) | Diagnostic Test | The Biodex Balance System SD Model 950-441(Biodex Medical Systems, Inc.) is a multi-dimensional (static and dynamic) postural control assessment and training system. It provides objective, valid, and reliable measures of a patient's ability to balance on stable and unstable surfaces. It measures the overall Stability Index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), and medial/lateral stability index (MLSI). Its intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reliability is R = 0.92 (OSI), R = 0.89 (APSI), and R = 0.93 (MLSI). Chronic neck pain subjects have demonstrated significantly worse Biodex balance performance across OSI, APSI, and MLSI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| A) Postural Stability (Biodex Balance System) | Overall Stability Index (OSI) - total amount of platform deviation.
(Higher scores = worse balance Reliability Evidence
For chronic cervical pain with hypomobility, the most appropriate Biodex protocol (supported by evidence) is:
| before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | The NPRS is an 11-point self-reported scale (0-10) for pain intensity.
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
The patients will be selected according to the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
The patients will be excluded if they present with:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Menna-Allah A Elnaggar, demonstrator | Contact | +201069014391 | me370433@gmail.com | |
| Rewan M Aloush, Teaching Assistant | Contact | +201024232512 | rewan.aloush@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Physical Therapy Delta University | Gamasa | Egypt |
Not provided
Group A (Experimental: Mulligan cervical
SNAG plus conventional physiotherapy) or Group B (Control:
conventional physiotherapy alone). Outcome assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, at eight weeks, immediately after completion of the final intervention session, and after four weeks for a short follow-up assessment (Follow-up assessment will be conducted 4 weeks after completion of the 8-week intervention period to evaluate retention of treatment effects).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 2-The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | Diagnostic Test | The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity that serves as a segmented numerical version of the visual analog scale (VAS). It consists of an 11-point scale where the respondent selects a whole number from 0 to 10 that best reflects the intensity of their pain, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing the "worst imaginable pain" . The NPRS has demonstrated high construct and criterion validity for assessing pain severity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. It is considered a valid tool for differentiating pain characteristics between individuals with chronic neck pain and healthy controls. The research suggests that the NPRS is often more responsive to clinical changes and easier for patients to comprehend than the traditional VAS .This scale is characterized by excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.95), |
|
| 3- The Neck Disability Index (Arabic version) for functional disability | Diagnostic Test | Neck disability index (NDI) is self-reported assessment includes ten items: pain severity, personal care, lifting, work, headaches, concentration, sleeping, driving, reading, and recreation. Higher scores imply a greater level of disability. Arabic version of the NDI was used to assess Arabic patients with neck pain, as the Arabic version of the NDI is reliable and valid |
|
| 4- Digital Inclinometer for Cervical Range of Motion | Diagnostic Test | A digital inclinometer is a handheld electronic device used to objectively measure the degrees of spinal curvature by detecting inclination relative to the force of gravity.In cervical spine assessment, it is used to quantify movements including flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation.The digital inclinometer is recognized as a highly valid and reliable instrument for measuring cervical range of motion (CROM). Recent studies have reported excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.85), particularly for cervical rotation and lateral flexion. It is often preferred over traditional goniometry because it provides precise, objective, and quantitative data that is less susceptible to manual measurement error. |
|
| 5- Arabic Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) | Diagnostic Test | The TSK-11 is a shortened, 11-item version of the original Tampa Scale, designed to assess kinesiophobia. Defined as an irrational and debilitating fear of physical movement resulting from a feeling of vulnerability to painful injury or re-injury . The Arabic version was developed to provide a linguistically and culturally adapted tool for assessing fear-avoidance beliefs in Arabic-speaking populations. The Arabic version of the TSK-11 has been cross- culturally validated and demonstrates strong psychometric properties. It exhibits high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values typically ranging from 0.86 to 0.90, and excellent test-retest reliability. It shows significant concurrent validity, as scores are strongly correlated with pain intensity (NPRS) and functional disability measures like the Neck Disability Index. |
|
| 6- Overhead LASER pointer for Cervical proprioception | Diagnostic Test | An overhead LASER pointer will be used to assess cervical proprioception by performing the Cervical Joint Position Error (JPE) test. The Joint Position Sense Error (JPSE) is considered one of the essential measures to clinically assess cervical proprioception. The test has good (ICC: 0.77-0.78) |
|
| Mulligan Cervical SNAG Technique Protocol | Other | Patient positioning: Seated or standing, with spine in neutral or slight flexion.
Technique variations: • Minor adjustments in force direction to optimize symptom reduction. |
|
| Conventional therapy group | Other | Based on the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neck Pain with Mobility Deficits, participants in the conventional therapy group received a multimodal treatment program consisting of mobility exercises, strengthening and endurance training, stretching exercises, and patient education
Sequencing: • SNAG mobilizations performed at session start, followed by active exercises and stretching Manual therapy timing: • SNAG component adds ~10 minutes to a 20-minute exercise session |
|
| before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up. |
| Neck Disability Index (Arabic Version) | The Arabic NDI is validated and used widely in neck pain research.
| before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up. |
| Digital Inclinometer for Cervical ROM | Multiple studies describe standardized inclinometer protocols Devices show good validity compared with 3D motion capture
| before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up. |
| Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11, Arabic Version) | Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Arabic version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-AV-11), which is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fear of movement in Arabic-speaking patients. It consists of 11 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement Brief and validated for chronic pain including neck pain Contains 11 items, each scored 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Procedure
| before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up. |
| Overhead Laser Pointer for Cervical Proprioception (Joint Position Error Test) | Setup
| before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up. |