Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to establish if non-invasive closed-loop neuromodulation is an effective approach to enhance cognitive function in healthy 18-40 years old volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare different closed-loop options to their open-loop counterpart to see if closed-loop approaches can increase efficacy and reduce the variability of the stimulation compared to open-loop approaches.
Participants will:
Closed-loop approaches may offer greater efficacy and lower variability across individuals compared to current open-loop stimulation approaches, yet they remain a relatively new approach, with no studies evaluating closed-loop transcranial low-intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (FUS) yet.
For this reason, we will collect and evaluate cognitive, biological and metabolic data from healthy participants, before and after closed-loop and open-loop stimulation interventions. This will allow us to compare our proposed closed-loop stimulation approach to stablished non-invasive techniques and to investigate the underlying mechanisms through which FUS can alter brain activity.
For this study, participants will attend multiple visits. To assess eligibility, participants will attend one initial session in-person before the start of the study.
Following safety guidelines, each participant will receive a maximum of two 1-hour MRI scanning sessions in a single week.
This study will be separated into three blocks of stimulation sessions: one block for tACS-FUS phase-locked on peak, and another block for tACS-FUS phase-locked on trough, and another block for TI-FUS. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive one of the blocks.
Before the during recruitment, participants will be asked to complete online some baseline questionnaires such as the O-Life inventory, BECK, MAIA, or STAI. Furthermore, full eligibility will be assessed in person.
At the first appointment, participants will have a brain scan at Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre or Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK. This will help us to apply the brain stimulation to the right part of the participant's brain, as well as obtain baseline functional, metabolic and structural information.
Participants will be randomly allocated to either receive open-loop FUS, closed-loop FUS, tES, or sham FUS, in the second appointment and the other interventions in the subsequent visits for their assigned block. During all stimulation sessions, we will use an AntNeuro neuronavigation system to guide the location of the transducer.
During either of the stimulation visits, participants will have physiological (EEG) and cognitive markers recorded. Some emotional assessments (i.e., through a short STAI) will be performed before and after stimulation. EEG recordings will be conducted before, during and after stimulation on the same day. Rest-state EEG will be recorded pre-stimulation before the start of the cognitive tasks, and post-stimulation after the end of the cognitive tasks.
The participant will then undergo one cognitive assessment, which will consists on a visual working memory task (delayed-spatial-estimation-task). The task involves visual stimuli, with responses recorded via keyboard. The task is designed to take approximately 5-15 minutes to complete on pre and post-stimulation. The duration of the task during stimulation will be adapted to the duration of the stimulation. Following this, participants will receive the allocated intervention.
Participants will have the same physiological and cognitive assessments recorded during the stimulation and after the stimulation has been completed. For the closed-loop stimulation, participants will also undergo an MRI scanning after the stimulation.
The first visit, consisting of brain scan, will be separated by at least 24 hours from the second visit. Subsequent visits will be separated by at least one week from each other.
During each consecutive appointment, participants will be asked about any changes to their eligibility and continued consent.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open-loop transcranial low-intensity FUS | Active Comparator | Transcranial low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (FUS) with 500kHz transducer for following either the continuous theta burst or intermittent theta burst protocol using the NeuroFus PRO system |
|
| Closed-loop transcranial low-intensity FUS | Experimental | Closed-loop Transcranial Electrical Stimulation by means of tACS or TI delivered through a Digitimer DS5 for brain entrainment phase-locked on peak or trough to transcranial low intensity FUS delivered to dACC through the NeuroFUS PRO system |
|
| tES alone | Active Comparator | tACS or TI delivered through a Digitimer DS5 for brain entrainment phase-locked on peak or trough |
|
| Sham FUS | Active Comparator | FUS delivered to ventricles or FUS and tACS located on head, one of them on or off depending on sham, or active. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial low intensity focused ultrasound (FUS) | Other | Low intensity focused ultrasound stimulation (FUS) with 500kHz transducer for following either the continuous theta burst or intermittent theta burst protocol using the NeuroFus PRO system |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from Baseline in EEG Power in Alpha Band (8-12Hz) | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Change from Baseline in EEG Power in Theta Band (4-7Hz) | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Change from Baseline in EEG Power in Beta Band (13-30Hz) | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Change from Baseline in EEG Power in Gamma Band (31-45Hz) | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Changes from Baseline in EEG-derived spectral power | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Changes from Baseline in Functional connectivity (e.g., through changes in Phase-locked value (PLV)) | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Average Reaction time (ms) measured from the Visual Working memory task | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Average Overall accuracy (%) measured from Visual Working Memory task | Baseline to 10 weeks, measured immediately before, during, and immediately after stimulation | |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Structured questionnaire assessing adverse effects of the intervention | Immediately after stimulation, 24 hours after stimulation and 1 week after stimulation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Falcon Caro | Contact | +44 115 823 2866 | alicia.falconcaro@nottingham.ac.uk | |
| Dr. Halls | Contact | +44 115 823 2866 | Daniel.Halls@nottingham.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marcus Kaiser, PhD | University of Nottingham | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Nottingham | Nottingham | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37121354 | Background | Zhai Z, Ren L, Song Z, Xiang Q, Zhuo K, Zhang S, Li X, Zhang Y, Jiao X, Tong S, Sun J, Liu D. The efficacy of low-intensity transcranial ultrasound stimulation on negative symptoms in schizophrenia: A double-blind, randomized sham-controlled study. Brain Stimul. 2023 May-Jun;16(3):790-792. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.021. Epub 2023 Apr 29. No abstract available. | |
| 35533835 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 16, 2026 | May 22, 2026 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D065908 | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
| C004551 | TES |
| D009682 | Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D003295 | Convulsive Therapy |
| D013000 | Psychiatric Somatic Therapies |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| transcranial electrical stimulation | Other | Transcranial electrical stimulation (by means of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) or non-invasive temporal interference (TI) electrical stimulation) using the DS5 isolated bipolar constant current stimulator together connected to a wave generator and with two electrodes for tACS (TI implementation will be carried out with two DS5 systems, separate wave generators and four electrodes). |
|
|
| Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Procedure | We obtain baseline functional, metabolic and structural information through MRI and MRS scanning |
|
|
| Change from Baseline in Target-Region metabolite Concentration measured via Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) |
| Baseline (Day 1) to immediately after closed-loop post-stimulation intervention |
| Changes from Baseline in Functional Connectivity calculated from functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) | Baseline (Day 1) to immediately after closed-loop post-stimulation intervention |
| Changes from Baseline on Structural connectivity metrics derived from multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) tractography | Baseline (Day 1) to immediately after closed-loop post-stimulation intervention |
| Sarica C, Nankoo JF, Fomenko A, Grippe TC, Yamamoto K, Samuel N, Milano V, Vetkas A, Darmani G, Cizmeci MN, Lozano AM, Chen R. Human Studies of Transcranial Ultrasound neuromodulation: A systematic review of effectiveness and safety. Brain Stimul. 2022 May-Jun;15(3):737-746. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.05.002. Epub 2022 May 6. |
| 27252625 | Background | Raco V, Bauer R, Tharsan S, Gharabaghi A. Combining TMS and tACS for Closed-Loop Phase-Dependent Modulation of Corticospinal Excitability: A Feasibility Study. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016 May 25;10:143. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2016.00143. eCollection 2016. |
| 40800403 | Background | Briley PM, Boutry C, Webster L, Veniero D, Harvey-Seutcheu C, Jung J, Liddle PF, Morriss R. Intermittent theta burst stimulation with synchronised transcranial alternating current stimulation leads to enhanced frontal theta oscillations and a positive shift in emotional bias. Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jan 25;2:imag-2-00073. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00073. eCollection 2024. |
| 34162993 | Background | Nakazono H, Ogata K, Takeda A, Yamada E, Oka S, Tobimatsu S. A specific phase of transcranial alternating current stimulation at the beta frequency boosts repetitive paired-pulse TMS-induced plasticity. Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 23;11(1):13179. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92768-x. |
| 29191438 | Background | Zrenner C, Desideri D, Belardinelli P, Ziemann U. Real-time EEG-defined excitability states determine efficacy of TMS-induced plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):374-389. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.016. Epub 2017 Nov 24. |
| 15531404 | Background | Gold JM. Cognitive deficits as treatment targets in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004 Dec 15;72(1):21-8. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.008. |
| D004191 | Behavioral Disciplines and Activities |
| D004597 | Electroshock |
| D011580 | Psychological Techniques |
| D013057 | Spectrum Analysis |
| D002623 | Chemistry Techniques, Analytical |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |