Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effectiveness of the Carrot Technique and Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) for the management of horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency in patients requiring implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Clinical outcomes including implant stability and soft tissue healing, as well as radiographic outcomes including alveolar ridge width, bone density, and marginal bone loss, will be evaluated using clinical examinations and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) during a 12-month follow-up period..
The Carrot Technique is a minimally invasive approach that utilizes an autogenous bone core harvested during implant osteotomy and repositioned to augment the deficient buccal ridge. This technique may reduce donor-site morbidity while providing sufficient horizontal bone augmentation. Guided Bone Regeneration remains one of the most widely used techniques for horizontal ridge reconstruction through the use of bone substitute materials and barrier membranes.
This randomized controlled clinical trial will compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Carrot Technique and GBR in patients presenting with horizontal ridge deficiency in the maxillary esthetic zone. Twenty patients requiring single-tooth implant rehabilitation will be randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group I will receive implant placement combined with the Carrot Technique, while Group II will receive implant placement combined with Guided Bone Regeneration.
Clinical evaluations will include implant stability assessed by resonance frequency analysis, soft tissue healing using the Landry Healing Index, and peri-implant inflammation using the modified sulcus bleeding index. Radiographic evaluation will be performed using cone beam computed tomography immediately after surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively to assess changes in alveolar ridge width, bone density, and marginal bone loss. The study aims to determine whether the Carrot Technique provides comparable or superior outcomes to GBR for horizontal ridge augmentation associated with implant placement.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrot Technique | Experimental | Implant placement with horizontal ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone core harvested with a trephine drill from the implant osteotomy site and fixed buccally using osteosynthesis screws. |
|
| Guided Bone Regeneration | Active Comparator | Implant placement with horizontal ridge augmentation using bone substitute material and a collagen membrane according to guided bone regeneration principles. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrot Technique | Procedure | Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal ridge augmentation using an autogenous bone core harvested from the implant osteotomy site with a trephine drill and fixed buccally using osteosynthesis screws. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Alveolar Ridge Width | Horizontal alveolar ridge width measured using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Changes in ridge width will be calculated by comparing measurements obtained immediately after surgery and at follow-up. | baseline and 12 Months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Marginal Bone Loss | Marginal bone loss measured radiographically using CBCT using the implant as a reference. | 12 Months |
| Soft Tissue Healing | Soft tissue healing assessed using the Landry Healing Index. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Good oral hygiene and patient compliance. Medically free from systemic diseases that contraindicate implant surgery. Slight to moderate horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency with a minimum ridge width of 5 mm.
Adequate vertical bone height for implant placement. Medium to hard bone quality (D2-D3 according to Misch classification). Absence of bruxism or other parafunctional habits.
Exclusion Criteria:
Poor bone quality (D4 bone). Pregnancy. Heavy smoking. Any medical condition contraindicating implant surgery.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sarah A Elmaghraby | Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University | Al Mansurah | Dakahlia Governorate | 35511 | Egypt | ||
| Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either the Carrot Technique or Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) during implant placement for treatment of horizontal alveolar ridge deficiency in the maxillary esthetic zone.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Guided Bone Regeneration | Procedure | Implant placement with simultaneous horizontal ridge augmentation using bone substitute material and a collagen membrane according to guided bone regeneration principles. |
|
| 1 Week, 2 Weeks, and 1 Month |
| Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index | Peri-implant soft tissue inflammation assessed using the Modified Sulcus Bleeding Index (mBI). | 1 Month and 12 Months |
| Bone Density | Buccal peri-implant bone density measured using CBCT and expressed in Hounsfield Units. | 12 Months |
| Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) | Implant stability assessed using resonance frequency analysis and expressed as Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ). | At implant placement and 12 months |
| Al Mansurah |
| Egypt |