Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Venetoclax combined with azacitidine (VEN-AZA) is the current first-line standard of care for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy. Although this regimen substantially improves remission rates, marked inter-individual variability is observed in clinical practice-ranging from severe myelosuppression or tumor lysis syndrome in some patients to poor response or early relapse in others. Venetoclax is primarily metabolized by CYP3A4, and its systemic exposure is modulated by multiple factors, including hepatic and renal function, concomitant medications (particularly azole antifungals), and UGT1A1 polymorphisms, leading to a 50%-70% inter-individual variability in blood drug concentrations.
Despite this variability, the current VEN-AZA regimen employs a fixed-dose strategy (400 mg/day) without incorporating therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide individual dosing. Critical knowledge gaps remain: (1) whether a clear exposure-response relationship exists between venetoclax exposure and composite remission rate (CR+CRi); (2) what blood concentration range optimizes efficacy while minimizing toxicity; (3) which covariates significantly influence venetoclax clearance; and (4) whether early concentration sampling can reliably predict subsequent exposure and clinical outcomes.*
To address these questions, investigators designed a prospective study enrolling newly diagnosed AML patients receiving VEN-AZA therapy. Investigators aim to systematically characterize the exposure-response relationship, establish an optimal therapeutic concentration window, identify key covariates contributing to inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability, and evaluate early-sampling prediction strategies. The findings are expected to provide direct evidence for TDM-guided individualized dosing and to support a paradigm shift from a "fixed-dose" to a "concentration-guided" approach in precision AML therapy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Venetoclax combined with Azacitidine | ND-AML patients received the venetoclax plus azacitidine as induction. Dosage is determined by clinicians based on routine practice (not mandatory in the study protocol). Venetoclax concentration data were collected on days 8, 15, and 22, and the steady-state trough concentration (Cmin), peak concentration (Cmax), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Complete remission rate | Percentage of subjects with complete remission (CR) and incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) | At the end of induction treatment (28 days ± 7days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Hematological toxicity | Number of subjects with hematological adverse events | Start of treatment to 2 weeks after end of treatment |
| Non-hematological toxicity | Number of subjects with non-hematological adverse events |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This prospective study included newly diagnosed AML patients who received the venetoclax plus azacitidine as induction. Venetoclax concentration data were collected on days 8, 15, and 22, and the steady-state trough concentration (Cmin), peak concentration (Cmax), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. The relationships between venetoclax exposure levels (Cmax, Cmin, and AUC) and efficacy, safety, survival, and individual patient characteristics were analyzed.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jia Chen | Contact | 86+052167976801 | drchenjia@163.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The first Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University | Recruiting | Suzhou | 21500 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015470 | Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007951 | Leukemia, Myeloid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Start of treatment to 2 weeks after end of treatment |
| Overall Survival | From start of induction treatment to time of death due to any cause, or until last follow-up | 24 months |
| Event-free Survival | From start of induction treatment to time of disease relapse/progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs earlier; or until last follow-up | 24 months |
| Measurable residual disease response rate | Percentage of subjects with MRD negative | At the end of induction treatment (28 days ± 7days) |
| D006402 |
| Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |