Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101156165 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Horizon Europe |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Oslo | OTHER |
| Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology | OTHER |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren de Limoges (CHUL) | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if close follow-up alone (active surveillance) works as well as radiation combined with chemotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) after removing early rectal cancer in adults. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare active surveillance to chemoradiotherapy to see if surveillance causes fewer serious adverse events while keeping cancer outcomes comparable.
To join this study, participants must be adults who had an early-stage rectal cancer (T1) removed by an endoscopic procedure, and whose removed tumor showed certain features that raise the risk of cancer cells remaining nearby.
Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups:
The current standard treatment for T1 rectal cancer (T1N0M0) is local excision by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or intermuscular dissection (IMD) performed endoscopically or via transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). More than half of the patients treated with ESD or IMD require secondary treatment due to unfavourable histopathological features in the resected specimen. Lesions can be classified as intermediate-risk if the specimen presents at least one of the following features: poor differentiation (grade 3), lymphovascular invasion, high-grade tumour budding (grade 2-3), or deep submucosal invasion (sm2-sm3).
Secondary treatment can be performed either by total mesorectal excision (TME) or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The latest evidence suggests that chemoradiotherapy may offer a superior risk-benefit ratio compared to completion TME. Still, chemoradiotherapy remains associated with a substantial risk of major low anterior resection syndrome (LARS); the risk is reduced but still reported at approximately 25-33%. Given a 15-20% risk of lymph node involvement in the intermediate-risk group, chemoradiotherapy might be overtreatment for the majority of these patients. Active surveillance can reduce treatment-related morbidity, but it is associated with higher local recurrence rates. Available cohort data suggest that most recurrences are detected early during structured surveillance and are salvageable with curative-intent surgery, resulting in oncological outcomes similar to those achieved with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, no randomised trial has directly compared these two strategies in this population.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active surveillance | Experimental |
| |
| Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active surveillance | Other | Active surveillance includes physical examination, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing every 3 months during years 1-2 and every 6 months during years 3-5. Rectoscopy is performed every 3 months during years 1-2 and every 6 months during years 3-5. Pelvic MRI is performed every 6 months for 5 years. Thoracic and abdominal CT scans are performed annually for 5 years. Colonoscopy is performed at 1 year after local excision and subsequently according to findings. Recurrences are managed according to multidisciplinary team recommendations. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-related treatment failure | Time from randomisation to the first occurrence of:
| 3 years from randomisation |
| Composite severe treatment-related adverse event | Occurrence of any of the following:
| 3 years from randomisation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease-free survival | Time from randomisation to first event: death (any cause), distant metastases, or locoregional recurrence | 3 and 5 years after randomization |
| Overall Survival | Time from randomization to death from any cause. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Pathologically confirmed rectal cancer located extraperitoneally.
Complete tumour resection (R0) by means of ESD or IMD (endoscopic or TAMIS).
Pathological report indicative of:
- pT1 with at least 1 of the following features: poor histological differentiation (grade 3), vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion, high tumour budding (grade 2-3), sm2 or sm3 invasion.
Endoscopic images or video of the tumour before local excision.
Maximum cancer diameter ≤ 30 mm based on the pathological assessment.
cN0 stage based on pelvic MRI; lymph nodes smaller than 10 mm will be considered as benign, independent of morphologic features. Staging must be performed within 6 weeks before randomisation.
- If enlarged lymph nodes are present on MRI performed after ESD/IMD (raising the possibility of reactive inflammatory change), fine needle aspiration (FNA) will be undertaken, and patients with negative FNA cytology will remain eligible.
Adequate distant staging (thoracic and abdominal CT) without signs of distant metastasis (cM0).
Have undergone a high-quality full colonoscopy:
Expected survival time of more than 12 months from randomisation.
At least 18 years old at the time of informed consent.
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0, 1 or 2.
Adequate hematologic function, based upon meeting the following laboratory criteria within 7 days before randomisation:
Adequate liver function, based upon meeting the following criteria within 7 days before randomisation:
Adequate coagulation defined by International Normalized Ratio (INR) ≤ 2.0 within 7 days before randomisation.
Adequate renal function, based upon meeting the following laboratory criteria within 7 days before randomisation:
Recovery from prior treatment-related toxicities to < Grade 2 severity per CTCAE v6.0, unless the adverse events are clinically nonsignificant and/or stable on supportive therapy.
Sexually active fertile subjects and their partners must agree to use medically accepted methods of contraception (e.g., barrier methods, including male condom, female condom, or diaphragm with spermicidal gel) during the study treatment. This does not apply to postmenopausal women (amenorrhoeic for at least 12 consecutive months), women aged above 55, or surgically sterilized patients (men and women).
Female participants of childbearing potential must not be lactating or pregnant, with a negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) test (blood or urine) at screening and before the first dose of the study treatment.
Females of childbearing potential are defined as premenopausal females capable of becoming pregnant (i.e., females who have had any evidence of menses in the past 12 months, except for those who had prior hysterectomy). However, women who have been amenorrhoeic for 12 or more months are still considered to be of childbearing potential if the amenorrhea is possibly due to prior chemotherapy, antioestrogens, ovarian suppression, low body weight, or other reasons.
Written informed consent to participate in the study provided before randomisation.
Capability of understanding and complying with the protocol requirements.
Absence of any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
Eligibility for thoracic, abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI.
Exclusion Criteria:
Suspicion of distant metastases on computed tomography of the abdomen or thorax or lymph node involvement (lymph nodes >9mm in short axis); In case of isolated enlarged nodes biopsy will be required before exclusion.
Mesorectal tumour involvement on pelvic MRI.
Synchronous colorectal cancer in screening colonoscopy.
Known genetic cancer syndrome, including, but not limited to adenomatous or serrated polyposis syndrome; Lynch or Lynch-like syndrome.
Known inflammatory bowel disease.
Previously identified allergy or hypersensitivity to 5-FU or capecitabine.
Known or suspected dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency.
Prior receipt of pelvic radiation.
Other contraindications to pelvic irradiation.
Serious illness other than cancer that would preclude safe participation in the study
Uncontrolled and significant condition, including, but not limited to, the following conditions:
Gastrointestinal disorders associated with a high risk of perforation or fistula formation.
Gastrointestinal bleeding event within 28 days of randomisation.
Major surgery performed within 4 weeks prior to randomisation or scheduled for surgery during the study period. Complete healing from major surgery must have occurred 1 month before randomisation. Complete healing from minor surgery must have occurred at least 7 days before randomisation.
Serious non-healing wound or bone fracture.
Malabsorption syndrome.
Pregnancy or lactation.
Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michal Kaminski, Prof. | Contact | (22) 546 23 28 | michal.kaminski@nio.gov.pl |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital, Limoges | Not yet recruiting | Limoges | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32936943 | Background | van Oostendorp SE, Smits LJH, Vroom Y, Detering R, Heymans MW, Moons LMG, Tanis PJ, de Graaf EJR, Cunningham C, Denost Q, Kusters M, Tuynman JB. Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment. Br J Surg. 2020 Dec;107(13):1719-1730. doi: 10.1002/bjs.12040. Epub 2020 Sep 16. | |
| 37669045 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057832 | Watchful Waiting |
| D059186 | Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017063 | Outcome Assessment, Health Care |
| D010043 | Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care |
| D011787 | Quality of Health Care |
| D006298 | Health Services Administration |
Not provided
Not provided
| Vestre Viken Hospital Trust |
| OTHER |
| Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf | OTHER |
| Karolinska Institutet | OTHER |
| University Hospital, Akershus | OTHER |
| University of Roma La Sapienza | OTHER |
| Hospital Clinic of Barcelona | OTHER |
| Leuven University Medical Center | UNKNOWN |
| University Hospital, Ghent | OTHER |
| Sorlandet Hospital HF | OTHER_GOV |
| Northern Norway Regional Health Trust | UNKNOWN |
| Helse Stavanger HF | OTHER_GOV |
| Haukeland University Hospital | OTHER |
| St. Olavs Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy | Radiation | Adjuvant long-course pelvic chemoradiotherapy will be initiated within 12 weeks after local excision. Radiotherapy consists of 45 Gy delivered in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy once daily, 5 days per week, over approximately 5 weeks. Concurrent chemotherapy consists of either oral capecitabine 825 mg/m² twice daily on radiotherapy days or continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil 225 mg/m²/day throughout radiotherapy. After treatment, follow-up includes history, physical examination, CEA testing, and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 6 months for 5 years; pelvic MRI every 6 months during the first 3 years; annual thoracic and abdominal CT for 5 years; pelvic CT after discontinuation of MRI surveillance; and colonoscopy at 1 year and thereafter according to findings. |
|
| 3 and 5 years after randomization |
| Stoma formation rate | Proportion of patients with a colostomy or ileostomy (permanent or temporary) present at assessment. Stoma rates will be evaluated at predefined follow-up intervals. | 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years after randomization |
| Incidence of Major Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) | Proportion of patients with a LARS Questionnaire score of 30 points or greater, indicating major low anterior resection syndrome. | 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years after treatment |
| Grade 3 or Higher Treatment-Related Toxicity | Incidence of adverse events of grade 3 or higher according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 6.0 occurring during treatment and follow-up. | From treatment initiation through 12 months after completion of chemoradiotherapy. |
| Locoregional Recurrence Rate | Proportion of patients with radiologically or histologically confirmed recurrence within the pelvis or mesorectum. | 5 years after randomization. |
| Salvageability of Locoregional Recurrence | Proportion of detected locoregional recurrences amenable to curative-intent salvage therapy. | At the time of recurrence detection, up to 5 years after randomization |
| Duration of Hospital Stay After Primary Treatment | Total cumulative length of hospitalization following the randomized treatment strategy, measured in calendar days. | From the day of randomization untill 5 years from randomization. |
| Distant Recurrence Rate | Proportion of patients with radiologically or histologically confirmed distant metastatic disease outside the locoregional area. | 3 years and 5 years after randomization. |
| Health-Related Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) | Health-related quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). | Baseline, 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years after randomization |
| Healthcare Resource Utilization Costs per Patient | Direct healthcare resource utilization costs including treatment, procedures, imaging, hospitalization, surveillance, and management of recurrence and complications measured as a total per patient in euro (€). | Up to 5 years after randomization. |
| Cost-Effectiveness | Incremental cost-effectiveness expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained and cost per disease-free survival year gained. | 3 years and 5 years after randomization |
| Ostomy-Free Survival | Time from randomization to permanent ostomy formation or death, with estimation of the proportion of patients alive without a permanent ostomy. | 3 years and 5 years after randomization. |
| Health-Related Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-CR29) | Health-related quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Colorectal Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-CR29). | Baseline, 12 months, 3 years, and 5 years after randomization. |
| University Clinical Centre | Recruiting | Gdansk | 80210 | Poland |
|
| Institute of Oncology in Warsaw | Recruiting | Warsaw | Poland |
|
| Background |
| Ouchi A, Komori K, Masahiro T, Toriyama K, Kajiwara Y, Oka S, Fukunaga Y, Hotta K, Ikematsu H, Tsukamoto S, Nagata S, Yamada K, Konno M, Ishihara S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda K, Togashi K, Ishiguro M, Kuwai T, Okuyama T, Ohuchi A, Ohnuma S, Sakamoto K, Sugai T, Katsumata K, Matsushita HO, Nakai K, Uraoka T, Akimoto N, Kobayashi H, Ajioka Y, Sugihara K, Ueno H; Study Group for the JSCCR-T study. How Does Omitting Additional Surgery After Local Excision Affect the Prognostic Outcome of Patients With High-risk T1 Colorectal Cancer? Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):290-296. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006092. Epub 2023 Sep 5. |
| 37793506 | Background | Corre F, Albouys J, Tran VT, Lepilliez V, Ratone JP, Coron E, Lambin T, Rahmi G, Karsenti D, Canard JM, Chabrun E, Camus M, Wallenhorst T, Chevaux JB, Schaefer M, Gerard R, Rouquette A, Terris B, Coriat R, Jacques J, Barret M, Pioche M, Chaussade S, Cappelle E. Impact of surgery after endoscopically resected high-risk T1 colorectal cancer: results of an emulated target trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Mar;99(3):408-416.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.027. Epub 2023 Oct 2. |
| 22504191 | Background | Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S. Low anterior resection syndrome score: development and validation of a symptom-based scoring system for bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):922-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824f1c21. |
| 40009914 | Background | Moolenaar LR, van Geffen EGM, Hazen SJA, Sluckin TC, Beets GL, Leijtens JWA, Talsma AK, de Wilt JHW, Tanis PJ, Kusters M, Hompes R, Tuynman JB; Dutch Snapshot Research Group; Collaborators Snapshot Registry. Salvageable locoregional recurrence and stoma rate after local excision of pT1-2 rectal cancer - A nationwide cross-sectional cohort study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun;51(6):109623. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.109623. Epub 2025 Jan 23. |
| 40434784 | Background | Serra-Aracil X, Pericay C, Cidoncha A, Badia-Closa J, Golda T, Kreisler E, Hernandez P, Targarona E, Borda-Arrizabalaga N, Reina A, Delgado S, Espin-Bassany E, Caro-Tarrago A, Gallego-Plazas J, Pascual M, Alvarez-Laso C, Guadalajara-Labajo H, Otero A, Biondo S; TAUTEM Collaborative Group. Chemoradiotherapy and Local Excision vs Total Mesorectal Excision in T2-T3ab, N0, M0 Rectal Cancer: The TAUTEM Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025 Jul 1;160(7):783-793. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1398. |
| 40562523 | Background | van der Schee L, Albers SC, Didden P, Lacle MM, Farina Sarasqueta A, Richir MC, Intven MPW, Tuynman JB, Hompes R, Dekker E, Vleggaar FP, Bastiaansen BAJ, Moons LMG. Results of endoscopic intermuscular dissection for deep submucosal invasive rectal cancer: a three-year follow-up study. Gut. 2025 Nov 10;74(12):1995-2003. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-334612. |
| 42202843 | Background | Moolenaar LR, Ali M, Aufenacker TJ, Beets GL, Bosker RJI, Buffart TE, Burger JW, Dekker E, Denost Q, Doornebosch PG, Duijvendijk PV, Fabry HFJ, Geijsen ED, Gerhards MF, van Grevenstein WMU, Grotenhuis BA, Hoff C, Leijtens JWA, Peeters KCMJ, Pronk A, van der Schelling GP, Sietses C, Smits AB, Toorenvliet BR, van de Ven AWH, Verdaasdonk EGG, Vuylsteke RJCLM, van Westreenen HL, de Wilt JHW, Zimmerman DDE, Lange MM, van Grieken NCT, Bastiaansen BAJ, Hompes R, Marijnen CA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Moons LMG, Tanis PJ, Cunningham C, Tuynman JB; TESAR Study Group. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus completion total mesorectal excision after local excision for early rectal cancer (TESAR): a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2026 Jul;11(7):557-569. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(26)00109-3. Epub 2026 May 27. |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
| D059248 | Chemoradiotherapy |
| D003131 | Combined Modality Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |