Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101095654 | Other Grant/Funding Number | EU Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. Early diagnosis is crucial to prevent vision loss, but current diagnostic pathways require multiple specialist visits and tests, leading to long waiting times and delayed diagnosis.
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of GlaukomAI, an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software that analyzes fundus photographs of the eye to detect glaucoma at an early stage.
The study is conducted at IRCCS Fondazione G. B. Bietti (Rome, Italy) and is structured in two phases:
Participants undergo a single study visit including standard ophthalmic examinations (visual acuity, eye pressure measurement, visual field test, OCT, and fundus photography). No investigational drugs or invasive procedures are involved.
The results of this study will provide evidence to support the integration of AI-based tools into routine glaucoma screening pathways, with the goal of reducing diagnostic delays and improving access to care.
Glaucoma is a chronic optic neuropathy representing one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide, with an estimated 111.8 million cases projected by 2040. Despite the availability of effective treatments, approximately 50% of affected individuals remain undiagnosed, as the disease progresses insidiously and symptoms often appear only when damage is already advanced and irreversible.
Current diagnostic limitations include high inter-operator variability in optic disc assessment, limited sensitivity of visual field testing in early stages, and suboptimal specificity of OCT (estimated at 72% in a Cochrane systematic review). No single examination provides sufficient diagnostic accuracy, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness for large-scale screening.
GlaukomAI (Sens-vue GlaukomAI) is an AI-based diagnostic software using deep learning with Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer architecture. It analyzes standard fundus photographs to detect key glaucoma biomarkers (neuroretinal rim appearance, inferior and superior sectors) and provides a diagnostic classification (Referable Glaucoma / Non-Referable Glaucoma) within 2-8 seconds per image. The system was trained on over 100,000 fundus images from diverse ethnicities, annotated by 30 eye care professionals and validated by 243 ophthalmologists and 208 optometrists across Europe.
Study Design
This is a prospective interventional clinical investigation with a non-CE-marked medical device, structured in two complementary phases:
All participants undergo a single study visit (or two visits within one week if needed) including: best-corrected visual acuity measurement, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, Humphrey visual field testing (24-2 SITA Standard or SITA Faster), fundus examination with Cup-to-Disc Ratio assessment, fundus photography using a widefield TrueColor Confocal imaging system (iCare DRS Plus), and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell layer (GCL+IPL) thickness assessment via Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss). No investigational drugs or invasive procedures beyond standard clinical practice are involved.
Statistical Analysis For Phase 1, sample size was calculated to detect an expected sensitivity and specificity of 88% with 95% confidence and ±8% precision, yielding 100 subjects per group. For Phase 2, enrollment of 1,000 patients allows estimation of real-world sensitivity and specificity with ±5% precision, assuming a 10% glaucoma prevalence in a tertiary referral center. Both eyes will be included in the analysis using generalized estimating equations (GEE) or mixed-effects models to account for intra-subject correlation. Diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, AUC) will be calculated with 95% confidence intervals. Agreement between methods will be assessed using Cohen's kappa; comparisons will use McNemar's test.
Funding This study is funded under the Transforming Health and Care Systems (THCS) partnership, co-funded by the EU Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme (Grant Agreement No. 101095654).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glaucoma Patients | Other | Participants with diagnosed glaucoma (primary open-angle, primary angle-closure or secondary glaucoma) undergoing standard ophthalmological examination and AI-based image analysis. |
|
| Healthy Controls | Other | Participants without ocular pathology and with normal ophthalmological examination undergoing standard ophthalmological examination and AI-based image analysis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GlaukomAI (Sens-vue GlaukomAI) | Device | GlaukomAI is an AI-based diagnostic software (Sens-vue ApS) that analyzes standard fundus photographs to detect glaucomatous changes. The system uses deep learning with Convolutional Neural Network and Transformer architecture to evaluate key glaucoma biomarkers, including neuroretinal rim appearance in the inferior and superior sectors. It accepts standard fundus images acquired with conventional fundus cameras or portable devices and provides a diagnostic classification (Referable Glaucoma / Non-Referable Glaucoma) within 2-8 seconds per image. The system is not CE-marked. Fundus images are acquired using a widefield TrueColor Confocal fundus imaging system (iCare DRS Plus), pseudonymized, and uploaded to the GlaukomAI secure platform by an operator blinded to the clinical diagnosis. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Accuracy of GlaukomAI - Sensitivity and Specificity | Sensitivity and specificity of GlaukomAI in the diagnosis of glaucoma, calculated against the gold standard defined by the consensus of a panel of three expert glaucoma specialists based on multimodal assessment (fundus photography, OCT, and visual field). Additional metrics include positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals. The optimal diagnostic cut-off will be identified using the Youden index. | At enrollment visit (single visit, or two consecutive visits within 1 week) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Referral Accuracy of GlaukomAI vs. Non-Specialist Ophthalmologists | Sensitivity and specificity of GlaukomAI in recommending referral to a glaucoma specialist (binary output: Referable / Non-Referable), compared to the gold standard and to the independent referral decisions of non-glaucoma-specialist ophthalmologists evaluating the same pseudonymized fundus images. | At enrollment visit |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria for all patients:
Inclusion Criteria for glaucoma patients:
Patients affected by any type of glaucoma (primary open-angle, primary angle-closure, secondary glaucoma) on pharmacological therapy
Inclusion Criteria for healthy controls:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francesco Oddone, MD, PhD | Contact | +39 06 84009442 | francesco.oddone@fondazionebietti.it | |
| Carmela Carnevale, MD | Contact | +39 06 84009442 | carmela.carnevale@fondazionebietti.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Francesco Oddone, MD, PhD | IRCCS Fondazione G. B. Bietti, Rome, Italy | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29506863 | Result | Li Z, He Y, Keel S, Meng W, Chang RT, He M. Efficacy of a Deep Learning System for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy Based on Color Fundus Photographs. Ophthalmology. 2018 Aug;125(8):1199-1206. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.023. Epub 2018 Mar 2. | |
| 37113471 | Result | Lemij HG, Vente C, Sanchez CI, Vermeer KA. Characteristics of a Large, Labeled Data Set for the Training of Artificial Intelligence for Glaucoma Screening with Fundus Photographs. Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 Mar 17;3(3):100300. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100300. eCollection 2023 Sep. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005901 | Glaucoma |
| D004194 | Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009798 | Ocular Hypertension |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
The study is structured in two sequential phases. In Phase 1, a case-control design is used to assess diagnostic accuracy: 100 participants with diagnosed glaucoma and 100 healthy controls all undergo fundus photography analysis with GlaukomAI, compared against a gold standard defined by a panel of three expert glaucoma specialists. In Phase 2, 1,000 consecutive outpatients attending a tertiary ophthalmological centre undergo the same AI-based fundus image analysis; results are compared both to the expert panel gold standard and to the independent assessment of non-glaucoma-specialist ophthalmologists evaluating the same images.
Not provided
Not provided
Multiple levels of masking are applied. The panel of three glaucoma experts defining the gold standard is blinded to the GlaukomAI output and to each other's assessments; final classification is determined by majority vote. The operator uploading fundus images to the GlaukomAI platform is blinded to the clinical diagnosis. In Phase 2, non-glaucoma-specialist ophthalmologists evaluate pseudonymized fundus images presented in randomized order, blinded to both the expert panel classification and the GlaukomAI output. Participants are not masked, as this is a diagnostic device study with no therapeutic intervention.
|
| Diagnostic Agreement - Cohen's Kappa | Diagnostic agreement between GlaukomAI and the gold standard, and between non-glaucoma-specialist ophthalmologists and the gold standard, assessed using Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ). Comparison between diagnostic methods on the same subjects will be performed using McNemar's test. | At enrollment visit |
| 31732524 | Result | Michelessi M, Quaranta L, Riva I, Martini E, Figus M, Frezzotti P, Agnifili L, Manni G, Miglior S, Posarelli C, Fazio S, Oddone F. Exploring the gap between diagnostic research outputs and clinical use of OCT for diagnosing glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;104(8):1114-1119. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314607. Epub 2019 Nov 15. |
| 26891880 | Result | Oddone F, Lucenteforte E, Michelessi M, Rizzo S, Donati S, Parravano M, Virgili G. Macular versus Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Parameters for Diagnosing Manifest Glaucoma: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Ophthalmology. 2016 May;123(5):939-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.12.041. Epub 2016 Feb 15. |
| 24974815 | Result | Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014 Nov;121(11):2081-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. Epub 2014 Jun 26. |
| 16488940 | Result | Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;90(3):262-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. |