Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This clinical study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of microfocused ultrasound treatment in patients with facial pigmentary diseases and rosacea.
The study includes two independent disease cohorts: a facial pigmentary disease cohort and a rosacea cohort. Participants in each cohort will be randomly assigned to receive either active microfocused ultrasound treatment or sham stimulation. Sham stimulation will follow the same treatment procedure as active treatment but will not deliver effective therapeutic ultrasound energy.
Participants will receive one treatment session per month for 6 months and will be followed for up to 12 months. The study will assess changes in clinical severity scores, digital skin imaging parameters, patient-reported symptoms, quality of life, and safety outcomes, including adverse events.
This is a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled, assessor-blinded, parallel-group clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microfocused ultrasound in patients with facial pigmentary diseases and rosacea.
The study consists of two independent disease cohorts. The facial pigmentary disease cohort will include participants with eligible facial pigmentary disorders, such as melasma, periorbital hyperpigmentation, melanosis, and lichen planus pigmentosus. The rosacea cohort will include participants who meet the diagnostic criteria for rosacea. Each cohort will be randomized separately in a 1:1 ratio to either the active microfocused ultrasound group or the sham stimulation control group.
Participants assigned to the active treatment group will receive microfocused ultrasound treatment once monthly for 6 months. The planned treatment parameters include a power range of 3.76 to 5.12 W and a frequency of 8 Hz, with each session stopped after the preset treatment endpoint is reached. Participants assigned to the sham stimulation group will undergo the same procedure, including use of ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but without delivery of effective therapeutic energy.
Efficacy assessments will include investigator-assessed clinical severity scores, patient-reported outcome measures, VISIA digital skin analysis, dermatology-related quality of life assessment, and psychological symptom assessment. Safety will be evaluated through physical examination, vital signs, and monitoring of adverse events and serious adverse events throughout the study.
An exploratory tissue sample substudy may be conducted in participants who voluntarily provide additional informed consent. This substudy is exploratory and will not affect participation in the main study or the primary efficacy analysis.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Microfocused Ultrasound - Pigmentary Disease Cohort | Experimental | Participants with facial pigmentary diseases will receive active microfocused ultrasound treatment once monthly for 6 months. |
|
| Sham Stimulation - Pigmentary Disease Cohort | Sham Comparator | Participants with facial pigmentary diseases will receive sham stimulation once monthly for 6 months. The sham procedure will follow the same treatment process as active treatment, including use of ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but without delivery of effective therapeutic ultrasound energy. |
|
| Active Microfocused Ultrasound - Rosacea Cohort | Experimental | Participants with rosacea will receive active microfocused ultrasound treatment once monthly for 6 months. |
|
| Sham Stimulation - Rosacea Cohort | Sham Comparator | Participants with rosacea will receive sham stimulation once monthly for 6 months. The sham procedure will follow the same treatment process as active treatment, including use of ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but without delivery of effective therapeutic ultrasound energy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microfocused Ultrasound Treatment | Device | Active microfocused ultrasound treatment will be administered using an ultrasound therapy device. Treatment parameters are planned as power 3.76 to 5.12 W and frequency 8 Hz. Each treatment session will stop when the preset treatment endpoint. Treatment will be performed once monthly for 6 months. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Melasma Area and Severity Index-Based Pigment Area and Severity Score at Month 6 | Change from baseline to Month 6 in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)-based pigment area and severity score in the pigmentary disease cohort. The score assesses lesion area, darkness, and homogeneity across facial regions. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe pigmentation. | Baseline to Month 6 |
| Change From Baseline in Clinician's Erythema Assessment Score at Month 6 | Change from baseline to Month 6 in the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score in the rosacea cohort. The CEA score ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear or no erythema and 4 indicates severe erythema. Higher scores indicate more severe erythema. | Baseline to Month 6 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Melasma Area and Severity Index-Based Pigment Area and Severity Score at Months 2, 4, and 12 | Change from baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12 in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI)-based pigment area and severity score in the pigmentary disease cohort. The score assesses lesion area, darkness, and homogeneity across facial regions. Total scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating more severe pigmentation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events | Incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and treatment-related local reactions, including facial numbness and skin pain. | Baseline through Month 12 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiangya Hospital, Central South University | Changsha | Hunan | 410083 | China |
Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to participant privacy protection, the sensitive nature of facial images and clinical dermatology data, and institutional data management requirements. De-identified aggregate results may be reported in scientific publications.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008548 | Melanosis |
| D012393 | Rosacea |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017495 | Hyperpigmentation |
| D010859 | Pigmentation Disorders |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This study includes two independent disease cohorts: a facial pigmentary disease cohort and a rosacea cohort. Participants in each cohort will be randomized separately in a 1:1 ratio to receive either active microfocused ultrasound treatment or sham stimulation. The study uses a parallel-group design. Efficacy analyses will be conducted separately for the two disease cohorts.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants and outcome assessors will be masked to treatment assignment. Sham stimulation will use the same treatment procedure as active microfocused ultrasound, including ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but without delivery of effective therapeutic energy. Treatment operators cannot be masked because they perform either active or sham treatment, but they will not participate in efficacy assessment, image evaluation, or statistical analysis. Treatment assignments will be maintained through a central randomization system until unmasking according to the study protocol.
|
| Sham Microfocused Ultrasound Stimulation | Device | Sham stimulation will use the same procedure as active microfocused ultrasound treatment, including ultrasound coupling gel, probe contact, treatment environment, and treatment duration, but will not deliver effective therapeutic ultrasound energy. |
|
| Baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Melasma Quality of Life Scale Score | Change from baseline in the Melasma Quality of Life Scale score in the pigmentary disease cohort. The scale contains 10 items scored from 1 to 7. Total scores range from 10 to 70, with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life and greater disease impact. | Baseline to Months 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Clinician's Erythema Assessment Score at Months 2, 4, and 12 | Change from baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12 in the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score in the rosacea cohort. The CEA score ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates clear or no erythema and 4 indicates severe erythema. Higher scores indicate more severe erythema. | Baseline to Months 2, 4, and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient-Assessed Flushing Severity Score in the Rosacea Cohort | Change from baseline in patient-assessed flushing severity score in the rosacea cohort. Flushing is assessed using the rosacea clinical study patient assessment form. Scores range from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates none and 4 indicates always present. Higher scores indicate more frequent or more severe flushing. | Baseline to Months 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient- and Investigator-Assessed Rosacea Clinical Symptom Severity Scores | Change from baseline in patient- and investigator-assessed rosacea clinical symptom severity scores. Patient-assessed symptoms are evaluated using the rosacea clinical study patient assessment form, and investigator-assessed signs are evaluated using the rosacea clinical study investigator assessment form. Each item is scored from 0 to 4. For patient-assessed items, 0 indicates none and 4 indicates always present. For investigator-assessed items, 0 indicates clear or none and 4 indicates severe. Higher scores indicate more severe rosacea symptoms or signs. | Baseline to Months 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index Score | Change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score. The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire assessing dermatology-related quality of life. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment in quality of life. | Baseline to Months 6 and 12 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Score | Change from baseline in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score. The PHQ-9 contains 9 items, each scored from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms. | Baseline to Months 6 and 12 |