Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Batman University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background:
Olfactory and gustatory impairments are common clinical manifestations in patients with neurodegenerative conditions like Parkinson's disease. These chemosensory deficits significantly impact the quality of life, often preceding motor symptoms. Currently, there is a need for effective non-invasive interventions to improve sensory recovery.
Objective:
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) combined with olfactory training in restoring chemosensory function. We aim to determine whether this combined approach provides superior outcomes compared to individual therapies or standard care.
Methods:
This clinical trial involves 120 patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. Participants will be randomized into four groups to receive either combined rTMS and olfactory training, isolated rTMS, isolated olfactory training, or a control intervention. The recovery of olfactory function will be measured using validated sensory testing tools (such as Sniffin' Sticks) and Electrogustometry (EGM) to assess neural pathway improvement.
Conclusion/Significance:
This study aims to provide evidence-based insights into non-invasive neurological rehabilitation for chemosensory dysfunction. The findings may help optimize personalized treatment protocols for patients suffering from sensory impairment, potentially enhancing their overall cognitive and sensory quality of life.
Study Design and Patient Selection:
This is a prospective, randomized, four-arm clinical study. A total of 120 patients meeting the inclusion criteria for Parkinson's disease-related chemosensory dysfunction are enrolled. Subjects are randomized using a 1:1:1:1 ratio.
Intervention Protocols:
rTMS Protocol: The intervention group receives high-frequency (10 Hz) stimulation targeted at the cortical regions associated with olfactory processing. The protocol consists of 2000 pulses per session.
Olfactory Training: Participants perform structured olfactory training utilizing standardized odorant sets, conducted twice daily over the 12-week study period.
Methodological Blinding: To ensure task compliance and methodological rigor, distilled water is utilized as a sensory blind check during testing procedures.
Measurements: Sensory assessments are focused on the lateral margins of the tongue using Electrogustometry (EGM) and standardized smell sensitivity tests. Changes in function are recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and 12-week follow-up intervals.
Statistical Analysis:
Data is analyzed to compare the mean sensory threshold changes between the four groups. Baseline characteristics and longitudinal improvements are evaluated using ANOVA followed by post-hoc analysis to determine the statistical significance of the combined therapy versus monotherapy and control groups.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| rTMS and Olfactory Training | Experimental | Participants in this group receive high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS stimulation (2000 pulses per session) targeted at cortical olfactory regions, combined with a daily structured olfactory training protocol over the 12-week study period. |
|
| Experimental: rTMS alone | Experimental | Participants in this group receive high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS stimulation (2000 pulses per session) targeted at cortical olfactory regions, without the concurrent structured olfactory training protocol, over the 12-week study period. |
|
| Active Comparator: Olfactory Training alone | Active Comparator | Participants in this group perform a structured 12-week olfactory training protocol twice daily using standardized odorants, without receiving any active rTMS stimulation. |
|
| Sham Comparator: Control Group | Sham Comparator | Participants in this group receive sham rTMS stimulation (using a deactivated coil setup) without any structured olfactory training for the 12-week study duration. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) | Device | High-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS stimulation (2000 pulses per session) targeted at cortical olfactory regions. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Sniffin' Sticks TDI Score from Baseline to Week 12 | The Sniffin' Sticks test evaluates olfactory function through Threshold, Discrimination, and Identification (TDI) scores. The primary endpoint is the mean change in the composite TDI score (range 1-48) from the start of the study (Baseline) to the end of the intervention (Week 12). | Baseline and 12 weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Sniffin' Sticks Odor Threshold Score from Baseline to Week 12 | The Sniffin' Sticks Odor Threshold Subtest evaluates olfactory sensory thresholds. Scores on this subtest range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 16. Higher scores indicate better olfactory function (a more sensitive odor threshold). The endpoint is the mean change in the odor threshold score from the start of the study (Baseline) to the end of the intervention (Week 12). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mustafa BARAN, PhD | Batman University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Batman University | Batman | Batman | 72060 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10867835 | Background | Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen CM, Seeber H, Pauli E, Hummel T. Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):205-11. doi: 10.1007/s004050050223. | |
| 31901449 |
Not provided
Not provided
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
The datasets will be available upon publication of the study results and will remain accessible for a period of 5 years following the publication date.
Qualified researchers who wish to access the IPD and supporting information (study protocol, statistical analysis plan, clinical study report) may submit a formal request to the corresponding author via email. The request must include a description of the intended research and evidence of institutional ethics committee approval. Data will be shared for valid scientific purposes, subject to a signed data sharing agreement to ensure participant confidentiality.
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 2, 2025 | Jun 18, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomized into four distinct groups (1:1:1:1 ratio) to receive their respective interventions simultaneously. Each participant remains within their assigned group throughout the entire 12-week study period, with no crossover between intervention protocols, ensuring independent assessment of the therapeutic effects for each group.
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are blinded to their assigned intervention arm, as they receive either active rTMS or sham stimulation, which are delivered using an identical setup. Outcome assessors, who perform the chemosensory evaluations (e.g., Sniffin' Sticks test), are also blinded to the group assignment of each participant to minimize assessment bias. Investigators involved in the analysis are masked to the group identities until the data collection phase is finalized.
| Structured Olfactory Training | Behavioral | Daily structured olfactory training protocol using standardized odorants (twice daily). |
|
| Sham rTMS | Device | Sham stimulation delivered using an identical coil setup without neural activation. |
|
| Baseline and 12 weeks. |
| Change in Sniffin' Sticks Odor Discrimination Score from Baseline to Week 12 | The Sniffin' Sticks Odor Discrimination Subtest evaluates the ability to differentiate between distinct odorants. Scores on this subtest range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 16. Higher scores indicate better olfactory function. The endpoint is the mean change in the odor discrimination score from the start of the study (Baseline) to the end of the intervention (Week 12). | Baseline and 12 weeks. |
| Change in Sniffin' Sticks Odor Identification Score from Baseline to Week 12 | The Sniffin' Sticks Odor Identification Subtest evaluates the cognitive ability to identify specific odorants. Scores on this subtest range from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 16. Higher scores indicate better olfactory function. The endpoint is the mean change in the odor identification score from the start of the study (Baseline) to the end of the intervention (Week 12). | Baseline and 12 weeks. |
| Background |
| Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, Filipovic SR, Grefkes C, Hasan A, Hummel FC, Jaaskelainen SK, Langguth B, Leocani L, Londero A, Nardone R, Nguyen JP, Nyffeler T, Oliveira-Maia AJ, Oliviero A, Padberg F, Palm U, Paulus W, Poulet E, Quartarone A, Rachid F, Rektorova I, Rossi S, Sahlsten H, Schecklmann M, Szekely D, Ziemann U. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. Epub 2020 Jan 1. |
| 19235739 | Background | Hummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hahner A, Weidenbecher M, Huttenbrink KB. Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):496-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.20101. |
| 26474316 | Background | Postuma RB, Berg D, Stern M, Poewe W, Olanow CW, Oertel W, Obeso J, Marek K, Litvan I, Lang AE, Halliday G, Goetz CG, Gasser T, Dubois B, Chan P, Bloem BR, Adler CH, Deuschl G. MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1591-601. doi: 10.1002/mds.26424. |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |