Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study aims to investigate, through the International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) questionnaire, the non-inferiority of the therapy with the alpha-blockers+Serenoa repens combination compared to the alpha-blockers+antimuscarinic combination on storage lower urinary tract syndrome (LUTS) in patients with moderate-severe symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in adult men. LUTS/BPH can be very bothersome and impair the quality of life (QoL) of affected men and their partners. Furthermore, LUTS also negatively impact patients' work productivity, being a major cause of absence from work and medical appointments. The prevalence of LUTS/BPH increases with age, making them increasingly common conditions in the Western world.
Standard medical treatments for patients with LUTS/BPH include alpha-blockers (ABs), 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs), phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, and antimuscarinics. Serenoa repens (HESr) supplements are also recommended as a therapeutic option in international LUTS guidelines. In particular, Serenoa repens has been shown to have anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and muscle relaxant effects that can counteract the effects of BPH. Historically, ABs have been used as first-line therapy for voiding LUTS, while antimuscarinics are effective for irritative LUTS. However, most patients often present with mixed LUTS and therefore require combination therapy. Recent studies have shown that the combination of AB + Serenoa was non-inferior to therapy with AB + 5ARI in improving LUTS, producing fewer side effects. In particular, Serenoa was also seen to be effective in improving irritative symptoms. However, no studies have compared therapy with AB + Serenoa to AB + antimuscarinics in patients with mixed LUTS due to BPH.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROUP 1 - AB+Serenoa repens | PATIENTS TREATED WITH AB+Serenoa repens | ||
| GROUP 2 - AB+antimuscarinics | PATIENTS TREATED WITH AB+antimuscarinics |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| DIFFERENCE IN IPSS | Difference in International Prostatic Symptoms Score (IPSS) at follow-up between the two treatment groups. IPSS min value 0 - max value 35, where:
| AT 6 MONTHS FOLLOW UP |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SIDE EFFECTS | Frequency of side effects in the two treatment categories | AT 6 MONTHS FOLLOW UP |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
The study population consists of men affected by moderate-severe BPH (assessed using the IPSS questionnaire) with mixed symptoms, treated with AB + Serenoa repens or AB + antimuscarinics in the period from January 2020 to October 2025, with follow-up until March 2025.
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LUCA BOERI, MD, PHD | Contact | +390255034501 | LUCA.BOERI@POLICLINICO.MI.IT |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011470 | Prostatic Hyperplasia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided