Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Bari Aldo Moro | OTHER |
| University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli | OTHER |
| Università degli Studi di Trento | OTHER |
| IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The prevention and management of cognitive decline and dementia represent major healthcare challenges. Neuropsychological assessment is a key component of current diagnostic criteria for Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (mNCD) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD), supporting both diagnosis and patient follow-up. It enables the evaluation of cognitive domains, monitoring of disease progression, and assessment of treatment effects.
Digital tools offer standardized, objective, and scalable methods for cognitive evaluation. The growth of telemedicine and the widespread adoption of digital technologies, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, have increased acceptance of remote healthcare solutions, including teleneuropsychology. Recent advances in mobile technology, together with lower costs and greater accessibility, have facilitated the large-scale implementation of digital cognitive assessments.
Tablet-based teleneuropsychological platforms are particularly advantageous for older adults, providing user-friendly interfaces and improving access to care for individuals with mobility limitations or those living in underserved areas. To promote harmonized neuropsychological assessment within the Italian Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation Network (RIN), this multicenter study aims to establish normative data and clinically validate Tenèpsia®, an innovative tablet-based teleneuropsychological platform certified as a Class IIa Medical Device. The study will support its clinical and research use while evaluating its diagnostic performance in patients with neurocognitive disorders.
The prevention and management of cognitive decline and dementia represent one of the major healthcare challenges of our time. Neuropsychological assessment, which is included in all current diagnostic criteria, represents a key step in the diagnostic pathway of patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) due to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent European intersocietal consensus guidelines have identified neuropsychological assessment as appropriate immediately after clinical screening, when the specialist formulates the suspicion of cognitive impairment and initiates the diagnostic process. At this stage, the assessment of the main cognitive domains is recommended, usually through standardized tests with normative values for the reference population. Beyond the diagnostic phase, neuropsychological assessment plays a crucial role in the clinical follow-up of patients, both to monitor disease progression and to measure the potential effects of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.
Digital tools able to assess patients through standardized, objective, and efficient methods on a large scale may have great clinical and research value. As shown by several experiences in Italy and abroad, telemedicine has emerged as a valid approach to provide remote care to patients with chronic conditions, helping to prevent the negative consequences of delayed diagnosis and interruption of care. The increased use of digital technologies for daily activities during the COVID-19 pandemic, including work, education, entertainment, and access to information, has improved familiarity with mobile digital devices and promoted greater acceptability of digital healthcare solutions, including among older adults. In this context, teleneuropsychology represents a highly promising area of innovation within telemedicine.
The most advanced approach in teleneuropsychology is the development of comprehensive neuropsychological batteries implemented in digital platforms for web-based assessment. Although this field has undergone substantial development over recent decades, the application of digital tools in clinical practice remains relatively limited. For many years, high costs and the limited use of digital devices among older adults restricted their implementation. More recently, major advances in mobile technology, together with lower costs and wider availability of digital devices, have paved the way for the large-scale application of teleneuropsychology.
Tablet-based teleneuropsychological platforms may improve and accelerate the diagnostic and patient management process, especially for individuals with comorbidities or motor disabilities and for those living in rural areas with limited healthcare resources. Moreover, tablets may be more efficient and accessible for older adults with cognitive decline or dementia, due to their practical and user-friendly interfaces compared with computers or smartphones.
The harmonization of neuropsychological assessment procedures in dementing disorders is essential for the development of shared clinical and research activities within the Italian Network of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation IRCCS Institutes (RIN). In this framework, the present multicenter study aims to collect normative data and clinically validate, in patients with neurocognitive disorders, an innovative tablet-based teleneuropsychological platform, Tenèpsia®. Tenèpsia® is already certified as a Class IIa Medical Device according to Medical Device Regulation 745/2017 for clinical use in support of neuropsychological diagnosis in patients with suspected neurocognitive disorders. Therefore, the present project does not aim to validate the device as a medical device, but rather to collect Italian normative data and evaluate its clinical performance in the context of neurocognitive disorders.
The general objective of the project is twofold: first, to collect normative data for the Italian population through the administration of the Tenèpsia® battery to a sample of healthy adults; second, to clinically validate the platform in patients with mild neurocognitive disorder, in order to promote its use in both clinical and research settings.
The primary objectives are: 1) to collect normative data through the administration of the tablet-based battery to healthy participants in a single session lasting approximately 45 minutes; and 2) to evaluate the ability of the Tenèpsia® platform to detect significant differences between patients with mild neurocognitive disorder and healthy controls.
The secondary objectives are: 1) to assess the association between scores obtained in the different tests included in the Tenèpsia® battery, separately in patients and controls; 3) to evaluate the contribution of each test of the Tenèpsia® battery in discriminating between patients and healthy controls; and 4) to assess the usability and user experience of the Tenèpsia® platform in both healthy participants and patients through validated questionnaires and scales.
This is a multicenter, proposer-coordinated, observational, transversal study. Both healthy adult volunteers and patients with a diagnosis of mild neurocognitive disorder, both males and females, are recruited at IRCCS Mondino Foundation in Pavia and at the other participating satellite centers.
Healthy participants are eligible if they are aged between 40 and 89 years and have a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score equal to or greater than 23, corrected for age and education. Patients are eligible if they are aged between 40 and 89 years and have a diagnosis of mild neurocognitive disorder according to DSM-5 criteria. Exclusion criteria for healthy participants include sensory deficits, such as visual or hearing impairment, and/or chronic pain potentially affecting teleneuropsychological performance, as well as chronic treatment with psychotropic drugs or other medications potentially interfering with cognitive functions, according to the recruiting physician's judgement. For patients, exclusion criteria include sensory deficits and/or chronic pain potentially affecting teleneuropsychological performance; chronic treatment with psychotropic drugs or other medications potentially interfering with cognitive functions; history of cerebrovascular disease, traumatic brain injury, or brain neoplasm; alcoholism; and severe systemic diseases associated with cognitive impairment, such as organ failure, endocrine disorders, particularly thyroid disease, or vitamin B12/folate deficiency.
The overall study duration is 12 months, with a recruitment period of 10 months. All participants are evaluated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and written informed consent is collected. For each participant, demographic information, including age, education, and sex, is recorded. A global cognitive assessment is performed in person using the MoCA. Trained expert examiners then carry out the teleneuropsychological assessment with the Tenèpsia® platform remotely.
All participants complete the Tenèpsia® teleneuropsychological battery through a dedicated tablet application. The battery includes tests designed to assess the main cognitive domains, namely memory, attention, language, executive functions, and visuospatial abilities. Specifically, the battery includes the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT), spatial supraspan, copy and delayed recall of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure, phonemic and semantic verbal fluency, complex figure description, naming test, pentagon copy, clock drawing test, symbol digit test, Stroop test, and emotion recognition test. The total administration time of the battery is approximately 45 minutes.
At the end of the assessment, participants complete questionnaires aimed at evaluating usability and user experience of the platform. These include the System Usability Scale, the Post-Study System Usability Scale, the Telehealth Questionnaire, the User Experience Questionnaire, and the IT Familiarity Questionnaire. Completion of these questionnaires takes approximately 5-8 minutes.
Overall, this study is expected to provide normative data for the Italian population and to explore the clinical utility, diagnostic performance, usability, and acceptability of the Tenèpsia® platform in both healthy adults and patients with mild neurocognitive disorder. The results may support the integration of tablet-based teleneuropsychology into clinical and research pathways, contributing to more accessible, standardized, and harmonized neuropsychological assessment procedures across participating centers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 200 healthy subjects | equally distributed between the collaborating centers | ||
| 50 patients | equally distributed between the collaborating centers |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Collecting normative data | Administration of the tablet-based battery to a sample of healthy subjects in a single session lasting approximately 45/60 minutes (Phase 1 objective) | At baseline |
| Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) | Verbal episodic memory assessed by the FCSRT. The digital version includes 16 words presented in four sets of four items. Free recall scores range from 0 to 48 and total recall scores range from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate better verbal leraning and memory performance. | At baseline |
| Spatial Supraspan | Visuospatial working memory assessed by the Spatial Supraspan test. Participants are required to reproduce increasingly longer spatial sequences presented on the tablet. Higher scores indicate better visuospatial memory performance. | At baseline |
| Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Delayed Recall | Visual episodic memory assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure delayed recall task. Scores range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate better visual memory performance. | At baseline |
| Phonemic and Semantic Verbal Fluency | Language and executive functioning assessed through phonemic and semantic verbal fluency tasks. Participants are required to generate words belonging to a semantic category or beginning with a target letter within a fixed time interval. The score corresponds to the number of correct words produced. Higher scores indicate better language and executive functioning. | At baseline |
| Complex Picture Description Test |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Learning and Memory: FCSRT, Spatial Supraspan, Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Delayed Recall. | Scores obtained on the FCSRT, Spatial Supraspan, and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Delayed Recall, which assess learning and memory abilities. Correlations between test scores will be examined separately in healthy controls and patients. | At baseline |
Not provided
Criteria of Healthy subjects:
Criteria of Pathological subjects:
Not provided
Not provided
200 healthy subjects and 50 patients with a diagnosis of Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (mNCD), equally distributed between the collaborating centers
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sara Bottiroli, PhD | Unit of Research in Cognitive Psycology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unit of Research in Cognitive Psychology | Pavia | 27100 | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28155182 | Background | Bosco A, Spano G, Caffo AO, Lopez A, Grattagliano I, Saracino G, Pinto K, Hoogeveen F, Lancioni GE. Italians do it worse. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) optimal cut-off scores for people with probable Alzheimer's disease and with probable cognitive impairment. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Dec;29(6):1113-1120. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0727-6. Epub 2017 Feb 2. | |
| 35982477 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D060825 | Cognitive Dysfunction |
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003072 | Cognition Disorders |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of Palermo | OTHER |
| Asst Degli Spedali Civili Di Brescia | OTHER |
| Azienda Usl di Bologna | OTHER_GOV |
| Istituto Auxologico Italiano | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Spontaneous speech production assessed using the complex picture description task from the Screening of Aphasia in NeuroDegeneration (SAND) battery. The score is based on the number of nouns, verbs and complete sentences produced. Higher scores indicate better language production abilities.
| At baseline |
| Picture Naming Test | Lexical-semantic abilities assessed by a picture naming task including 16 coloured living and non-living objects. Scores range from 0 to 16. Higher scores indicate better naming performance and lexical retrieval abilities. | At baseline |
| Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Copy | Visuoconstructional abilities assessed by the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure copy task. Scores range from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate better visuospatial and constructional abilities. | At baseline |
| Pentagon Copying Test | Visuoconstructional abilities assessed through copying intersecting pentagons. Higher scores indicate better visuospatial and constructional performance. | At baseline |
| Clock Drawing Test | Visuospatial and executive functioning assessed by the Clock Drawing Test. Higher scores indicate better visuoconstructional and executive abilities. | At baseline |
| Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) | Attention, processing speed and executive functioning assessed by the SDMT. The score corresponds to the number of correct symbol-digit associations completed within the allotted time. Higher scores indicate better cognitive processing speed and attention. | At baseline |
| Stroop Test | Executive functioning and inhibitory control assessed by the Stroop Test. Scores are based on response accuracy and interference effects across test conditions. Better performance is reflected by fewer errors and lower interference. | At baseline |
| Emotion Recognition Test | Social cognition assessed by the Emotion Recognition Test. The digital version includes 28 facial stimuli depicting basic emotions and neutral expressions. Scores range from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate better recognition of facial emotions and social cognitive functioning. | At baseline |
| Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) | Depressive symptoms assessed by the 15-item GDS. Scores range from 0 to 15. Higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms. A score of 5 or greater suggests clinically relevant depressive symptoms. | At baseline |
| Activities of Daily Living (ADL) | Basic functional independence assessed by the ADL scale. Scores range from 0 to 6. Higher scores indicate greater independence in daily functioning. | At baseline |
| Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) | Functional independence in complex daily activities assessed by the IADL scale. Scores range from 0 to 8. Higher scores indicate greater functional independence. | At baseline |
| Language: Picture Naming Test, Phonemic and Semantic Verbal Fluency, Complex Picture Description Test. | Scores obtained on the Picture Naming test, Phonemic and Semantic Verbal Fluency, and Complex Picture Description Test, which assess language abilities. Correlations between test scores will be examined separately in healthy controls and patients. | At baseline |
| Visuo-perceptual and Constructional Skills: Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Copy, Pentagon Copying Test, Clock Drawing Test. | Scores obtained on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Copy, Pentagon Copying Test, and Clock Drawing Test, which assess visuoperceptual and constructional abilities. Correlations between test scores will be examined separately in healthy controls and patients. | At baseline |
| Attention and Executive Functions: SDMT, Stroop Test. | Scores obtained on the SDMT and Stroop Test, which assess attention, processing speed, inhibitory control, and executive functioning. Correlations between test scores will be examined separately in healthy controls and patients. | At baseline |
| Evaluation of the usability and user-experience | Administration of validated questionnaires and scales to both healthy subjects and patients. | At baseline |
| Conca F, Esposito V, Rundo F, Quaranta D, Muscio C, Manenti R, Caruso G, Lucca U, Galbussera AA, Di Tella S, Baglio F, L'Abbate F, Canu E, Catania V, Filippi M, Mattavelli G, Poletti B, Silani V, Lodi R, De Matteis M, Stanzani Maserati M, Arighi A, Rotondo E, Tanzilli A, Pace A, Garramone F, Cavaliere C, Pardini M, Rizzetto C, Sorbi S, Perri R, Tiraboschi P, Canessa N, Cotelli M, Ferri R, Weintraub S, Marra C, Tagliavini F, Catricala E, Cappa SF. Italian adaptation of the Uniform Data Set Neuropsychological Test Battery (I-UDSNB 1.0): development and normative data. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022 Aug 19;14(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s13195-022-01056-x. |
| 31248465 | Background | Stasenko A, Jacobs DM, Salmon DP, Gollan TH. The Multilingual Naming Test (MINT) as a Measure of Picture Naming Ability in Alzheimer's Disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Sep;25(8):821-833. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000560. Epub 2019 Jun 28. |
| 33927583 | Background | Staffaroni AM, Tsoy E, Taylor J, Boxer AL, Possin KL. Digital Cognitive Assessments for Dementia: Digital assessments may enhance the efficiency of evaluations in neurology and other clinics. Pract Neurol (Fort Wash Pa). 2020 Nov-Dec;2020:24-45. No abstract available. |
| 22382386 | Background | Bauer RM, Iverson GL, Cernich AN, Binder LM, Ruff RM, Naugle RI. Computerized neuropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 May;27(3):362-73. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acs027. Epub 2012 Mar 1. |
| 32844714 | Background | Hammers DB, Stolwyk R, Harder L, Cullum CM. A survey of international clinical teleneuropsychology service provision prior to and in the context of COVID-19. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct-Nov;34(7-8):1267-1283. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1810323. Epub 2020 Aug 26. |
| 32666093 | Background | Bilder RM, Postal KS, Barisa M, Aase DM, Cullum CM, Gillaspy SR, Harder L, Kanter G, Lanca M, Lechuga DM, Morgan JM, Most R, Puente AE, Salinas CM, Woodhouse J. Inter Organizational Practice Committee Recommendations/Guidance for Teleneuropsychology in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemicdagger. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Aug 28;35(6):647-659. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acaa046. |
| 32519594 | Background | Marra DE, Hamlet KM, Bauer RM, Bowers D. Validity of teleneuropsychology for older adults in response to COVID-19: A systematic and critical review. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct-Nov;34(7-8):1411-1452. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1769192. Epub 2020 Jun 10. |
| 34937315 | Background | Gareev I, Gallyametdinov A, Beylerli O, Valitov E, Alyshov A, Pavlov V, Izmailov A, Zhao S. The opportunities and challenges of telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2021 Dec 20;13(2):291-298. doi: 10.52586/E885. |
| 33388003 | Background | Colbert GB, Venegas-Vera AV, Lerma EV. Utility of telemedicine in the COVID-19 era. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 30;21(4):583-587. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.04.188. |
| 33314910 | Background | Lukas H, Xu C, Yu Y, Gao W. Emerging Telemedicine Tools for Remote COVID-19 Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Management. ACS Nano. 2020 Dec 22;14(12):16180-16193. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08494. Epub 2020 Dec 14. |
| 33300414 | Background | Hincapie MA, Gallego JC, Gempeler A, Pineros JA, Nasner D, Escobar MF. Implementation and Usefulness of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720980612. doi: 10.1177/2150132720980612. |
| 36873886 | Background | Bernini S, Panzarasa S, Quaglini S, Costa A, Picascia M, Cappa SF, Cerami C, Tassorelli C, Vecchi T, Bottiroli S. HomeCoRe system for telerehabilitation in individuals at risk of dementia: A usability and user experience study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Feb 17;10:1129914. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1129914. eCollection 2023. |
| 34573267 | Background | van der Walt A, Butzkueven H, Shin RK, Midaglia L, Capezzuto L, Lindemann M, Davies G, Butler LM, Costantino C, Montalban X. Developing a Digital Solution for Remote Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: From Concept to Software as a Medical Device. Brain Sci. 2021 Sep 21;11(9):1247. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11091247. |
| 32440979 | Background | Moccia M, Lanzillo R, Brescia Morra V, Bonavita S, Tedeschi G, Leocani L, Lavorgna L; Digital Technologies Web and Social Media Study Group of the Italian Society of Neurology. Assessing disability and relapses in multiple sclerosis on tele-neurology. Neurol Sci. 2020 Jun;41(6):1369-1371. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04470-x. Epub 2020 May 21. |
| 33984176 | Background | Boccardi M, Monsch AU, Ferrari C, Altomare D, Berres M, Bos I, Buchmann A, Cerami C, Didic M, Festari C, Nicolosi V, Sacco L, Aerts L, Albanese E, Annoni JM, Ballhausen N, Chicherio C, Demonet JF, Descloux V, Diener S, Ferreira D, Georges J, Gietl A, Girtler N, Kilimann I, Kloppel S, Kustyniuk N, Mecocci P, Mella N, Pigliautile M, Seeher K, Shirk SD, Toraldo A, Brioschi-Guevara A, Chan KCG, Crane PK, Dodich A, Grazia A, Kochan NA, de Oliveira FF, Nobili F, Kukull W, Peters O, Ramakers I, Sachdev PS, Teipel S, Visser PJ, Wagner M, Weintraub S, Westman E, Froelich L, Brodaty H, Dubois B, Cappa SF, Salmon D, Winblad B, Frisoni GB, Kliegel M; Consortium for the Harmonization of Neuropsychological Assessment for Neurocognitive Disorders (https://nextcloud.dzne.de/index.php/s/EwXjLab9caQTbQe). Harmonizing neuropsychological assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders in Europe. Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Jan;18(1):29-42. doi: 10.1002/alz.12365. Epub 2021 May 13. |
| 21514249 | Background | Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, Gamst A, Holtzman DM, Jagust WJ, Petersen RC, Snyder PJ, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):270-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 21. |
| 21514250 | Background | McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011 May;7(3):263-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 21. |
| D002493 |
| Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |