Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the foot-intensive rehabilitation with and without perturbation-based training on pain reduction, range of motion improvement, balance enhancement, and functional instability in patients recovering from ankle sprains NULL HYPOTHESIS There will be no significant difference in the effectiveness of foot-intensive rehabilitation with perturbation-based training compared to foot-intensive rehabilitation alone in reducing pain, improving range of motion, enhancing balance, or reducing functional instability among patients recovering from ankle sprains.
ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS There will be a significant difference in pain reduction, range of motion improvement, balance enhancement, and reduction in functional instability between patients undergoing foot- intensive rehabilitation with perturbation-based training compared to those undergoing foot-intensive rehabilitation.
Study Design:
It will be a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Population:
Ankle Sprain Both groups will undergo the assigned interventions for the duration of 6 weeks under the supervision of trained physical therapists or healthcare professionals. The interventions will aim to address pain reduction, range of motion improvement, balance enhancement, and reduction in functional instability among participants recovering from ankle sprains.
Group A: Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation with Perturbation-Based Training
Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation:
Participants in Group A will undergo a structured rehabilitation program focused on addressing ankle sprains and improving foot-specific impairments. This program will typically include:
Perturbation-Based Training: In addition to the foot-intensive rehabilitation program, participants will undergo perturbation-based training sessions:
Group B: Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation without Perturbation-Based Training
Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation:
Participants in Group B will receive the same structured rehabilitation program focusing on foot- intensive exercises as in Group A. This program includes similar components such as therapeutic exercises, manual therapy, modalities, and functional training targeting ankle sprain recovery and foot-specific impairments.
Both groups will undergo the assigned interventions for the duration of 6 weeks under the supervision of trained physical therapists or healthcare professionals
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation | Active Comparator | Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation: Participants in Group A will undergo a structured rehabilitation program focused on addressing ankle sprains and improving foot-specific impairments |
|
| Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation + Perturbation-Based Training | Experimental | In addition to the foot-intensive rehabilitation program, participants will undergo perturbation-based training sessions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation | Other | Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation This program will typically include:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Numeric pain rate scale (NPRS) | Patient level of pain will be assessed using this scale. This scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 indicates "no pain" and 10 indicates "worst pain" (Riley et al., 2019) | 6 weeks (Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week) |
| Range of Motion (ROM) Measurement | Goniometer: To measure dorsiflexion, plantarflexion, inversion, and eversion of the ankle joint(Rome & Cowieson, 1996). | 6 weeks (Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week) |
| Balance Assessment: | Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT): Measures reach distances in multiple directions to assess dynamic balance and reach symmetry.(Coughlan et al., 2012) | 6 weeks (Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week) |
| Functional Instability Measurement | Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT): A questionnaire to assess the severity of functional ankle instability.(ALEXANDRE et al., 2024) | 6 weeks (Baseline, 3rd week, 6th week) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Gender: male /female
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sana Akram, MSOMPT | University of Lahore | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pakistan Sports Board | Lahore | Punjab Province | 54000 | Pakistan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Foot-Intensive Rehabilitation + Perturbation-Based Training | Other | In addition to the foot-intensive rehabilitation program, participants in experimental group will undergo perturbation-based training sessions:
|
|