Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20261196 | Registry Identifier | WCG IRB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates a new medical device called the EpiFaithâ„¢ Syringe, which is designed to help clinicians more accurately identify the epidural space during pain management procedures. The epidural space is a narrow area near the spine where medication is delivered to treat chronic pain conditions. Finding this space correctly is a critical step in procedures such as epidural steroid injections, spinal cord stimulator placement, and minimally invasive lumbar decompression (MILD).
Currently, clinicians locate the epidural space using a method called loss-of-resistance (LOR), which relies on the feel of a syringe plunger as a needle is advanced toward the epidural space. This technique depends on the clinician's experience and touch, and can sometimes result in multiple needle attempts or an incorrect signal that the epidural space has been reached when it has not.
The EpiFaithâ„¢ Syringe is designed to provide a clear visual signal, called the Faith Signal, at the moment the epidural space is entered, reducing reliance on touch alone. The device is used with standard epidural needles and does not require additional equipment or significant changes to routine procedure workflow.
This study will enroll 100 adults scheduled for a clinically indicated epidural pain procedure at Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions in Temecula or San Diego, California. Participants will be assigned to have their procedure performed using either the EpiFaithâ„¢ Syringe or a standard LOR syringe. The study will compare the number of needle attempts needed to access the epidural space and the rate of false signals between the two methods. Safety and patient-reported pain outcomes will also be collected for approximately one week following the procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional LOR Syringe | Active Comparator | Standard-of-care loss-of-resistance technique using a conventional syringe during epidural procedures |
|
| EpiFaithâ„¢ Syringe | Experimental | EpiFaithâ„¢ syringe used in place of conventional LOR technique. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EpiFaithâ„¢ Syringe | Device | The EpiFaithâ„¢ Syringe is a sterile, single-use piston syringe designed to assist clinicians in identifying the epidural space during neuraxial procedures. Unlike conventional loss-of-resistance syringes that rely solely on tactile feedback, the EpiFaithâ„¢ incorporates a spring-loaded piston mechanism that produces an objective visual indicator, the "Faith Signal," at the moment resistance decreases consistent with epidural space entry. The device is compatible with standard epidural needles and integrates into routine procedural workflow without significant modification. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure number of attempts | Measure: Number of puncture/needle placement attempts required to achieve successful epidural space access | Intra-procedure |
| Measure false loss-of-resistance | Measure: False-positive loss-of-resistance (false LOR) rate, confirmed via epidurography/fluoroscopic contrast pattern when performed per routine care | Intra-procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure device related and procedure-related adverse events | Measure: Incidence, nature, and severity of device-related and procedure-related adverse events | Procedure day through approximately 1 week post-procedure |
| Change in pain intensity score on the 11-Point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure Duration From Skin Puncture to Successful Epidural Access | Procedure duration will be measured as the time from initial epidural needle skin puncture to successful epidural space access during the index procedure. Duration will be recorded in minutes based on the procedure record or other prespecified time documentation. Lower values indicate shorter time to epidural access. | During the index epidural procedure on Day 0. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maja Green, PhD, MBA | Contact | 858-910-1778 | mgreen@solarisresearchinstitute.com | |
| Michelle Yi, BSC | Contact | 760-846-5822 | myi@solarisresearchinstitute.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maja Green, PhD, MBA | Solaris Research Institute Inc | Study Director |
| Krishnan Chakravarthy, MD, PhD | Solaris Research Institute Inc | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions | San Diego | California | 92111 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Conventional Loss-of-Resistance Syringe | Device | Standard saline loss-of-resistance technique using a conventional epidural syringe. The clinician applies intermittent or continuous pressure to the syringe plunger while advancing the epidural needle, interpreting a sudden reduction in resistance as entry into the epidural space. No investigational device is used in this arm. |
|
Pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale for pain, scored from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Change from baseline will be calculated at each post-procedure follow-up time point. Negative change values indicate improvement, reflecting lower pain intensity compared with baseline. |
| Baseline before the procedure on Day 0 and approximately 3 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days after the procedure. |
| Clinician Usability Score on a 5-Point Likert Agreement Scale | Clinician usability and workflow integration will be assessed immediately after the procedure using a structured post-procedure questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluates ease of setup and preparation, clarity of the visual indicator, support for stable and controlled needle advancement, confidence in identifying the epidural space, integration into standard workflow, reduction in uncertainty compared with conventional loss-of-resistance technique, overall satisfaction, and willingness to use the device again for similar procedures. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert agreement scale from 1 to 5, where 1 indicates strongly disagree, 3 indicates neutral, and 5 indicates strongly agree. Higher scores indicate better clinician-perceived usability, satisfaction, and workflow integration. | Immediately after completion of the index epidural procedure on Day 0, before participant discharge. |
| Procedure success rate | Procedure success rate will be defined as the proportion of participants in whom successful epidural access is achieved and the intended epidural procedure is completed as planned without procedure abortion or conversion to an alternative non-study approach. Higher percentages indicate greater procedural success. Unit of measure: Percentage of participants | During the index epidural procedure on Day 0. |
| Contrast-confirmed epidural spread rate | Contrast-confirmed epidural spread rate will be defined as the proportion of participants with documented epidural contrast spread among participants in whom contrast injection is performed as part of routine clinical care. Participants in whom contrast is not used per routine care will not be included in the denominator for this outcome measure. Higher percentages indicate a greater rate of imaging-confirmed epidural spread. Unit of measure: Percentage of participants with contrast use | During the index epidural procedure on Day 0. |
| Total Fluoroscopy time | Total fluoroscopy time will be recorded for participants in whom fluoroscopy is used as part of routine clinical care during the index epidural procedure. Fluoroscopy time will be measured in seconds based on the procedure record or fluoroscopy system output. Lower values indicate shorter fluoroscopy exposure time. | During the index epidural procedure on Day 0. |
| Innovative Pain Treatment Solutions | Temecula | California | 92590 | United States |
|