Traditional Versus Cluster Resistance Training in Striking Combat Sport Athletes

Effects of Traditional and Cluster Resistance Training Using Four Multi-Joint Exercises on Neuromuscular Performance in Striking Combat Sport Athletes

This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of traditional and cluster resistance training on neuromuscular performance in amateur striking combat sport athletes. Twenty-eight athletes completed a 6-week full-body resistance training program including squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull exercises. Participants were assigned to either a traditional training group, which performed repetitions continuously, or a cluster training group, which incorporated short intra-set rest periods. Neuromuscular performance was assessed before and after the intervention through countermovement jump height, medicine-ball throw distance, and load-velocity relationship variables obtained from the four resistance exercises. The study aimed to determine whether cluster resistance training provides superior neuromuscular adaptations compared with traditional resistance training when training volume and relative intensity are matched.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Healthy men and women aged 18 years or older. Active participation in striking combat sports (boxing, kickboxing, or karate) for at least 3 years.
• Minimum of 1 year of experience with the resistance exercises included in the study (squat, bench press, deadlift, and bench pull).
• Willingness to refrain from participating in additional strength training programs during the study period.
• Provision of written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presence of any musculoskeletal injury during the 6 months preceding data collection.
• Any medical condition that could contraindicate participation in resistance training.
• Failure to complete the training intervention or testing procedures.