Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We describe a single-center, retrospective case series (n = 10) for the utilization of dual instruments to extract foreign body at physiological narrowing. Foreign bodies that failed to remove with a single instrument or located in physiological narrowing into the duodenal bulb or descending duodenum were considered appropriate for this technique. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before the procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| dual-instrument |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Successful Endoscopic Foreign Body Removal Rate | Percentage of patients in whom the foreign body is completely removed using the dual-instrument endoscopic retrieval technique without the need for surgical intervention. Success will be assessed by direct endoscopic visualization and procedural records. | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Procedure-Related Adverse Event Rate | Percentage of patients experiencing procedure-related adverse events, including mucosal injury, bleeding, perforation, aspiration, or infection. Adverse events will be assessed based on endoscopic findings, clinical evaluation, and post-procedural medical records. | 1 week |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
-Consecutive patients who underwent dual-instrument endoscopic retrieval for upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies at our center during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria:
-Patients with incomplete clinical or procedural records. Patients lost to follow-up immediately after the procedure.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, we retrospectively examined the records of 10 patients who underwent endoscopic foreign body extraction at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University between January 2018 and January 2026. All patients initially presented to the emergency department and underwent an initial single-instrument endoscopic retrieval attempt. When single-instrument retrieval was unsuccessful or unstable, a dual-instrument endoscopic retrieval technique was subsequently applied. All procedures were performed by a single experienced therapeutic endoscopist.
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhongshan Hospital | Shanghai | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | 1. Yu S, Wang X, Chen X. Removal of giant spherical foreign body in the esophagus by double-forceps endoscope and double balloon. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(8):0300060520941332. doi:10.1177/0300060520941332 2. Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez P, et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2016;48(05):489-496. doi:10.1055/s-0042-100456 3. Emara M, Darwiesh E, Refaey M, Galal S. Endoscopic removal of foreign bodies from the upper gastrointestinal tract: 5-year experience. CEG. Published online July 2014:249. doi:10.2147/CEG.S63274 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005547 | Foreign Bodies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided