Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Lucida Medical Ltd | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prostate cancer is the most common male cancer in 112 countries and makes up 7% of global cancer cases, and is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in men.
Normally, men with suspected prostate cancer undergo a prostate MRI, and then a Radiologist would review this scan to identify any suspicious areas for cancer within the prostate. Prostate MRI interpretation, however, is an expert skill with a steep learning curve, and internationally, there is a growing shortage of Radiologists.
The PARADIGM trial aims to assess if AI can perform just as well as Radiologists in interpreting prostate MRI scans to identify prostate cancer. Enrolled participants will undergo a prostate MRI, which is the normal method used for investigating suspected prostate cancer. AI and a Radiologist will both interpret the MRI, without knowledge of each other's interpretation. Once both reports have been made, the Radiologist will be asked to produce a third, combined report.
If there is a suspicious area in the prostate identified either by AI or the Radiologist, targeted biopsies will be performed. If there are no suspicious areas on the MRI and if you are at low risk of harbouring cancer, which occurs in about 30% of men, then no biopsy will be taken at all.
Aim: To assess whether artificial intelligence is non-inferior to radiologists in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer on MRI.
Objectives
Primary
1. To compare the proportion of men who have clinically significant prostate cancer detected on MRI using AI ± targeted biopsy with radiologists ± targeted biopsy.
Secondary
Design:
Prospective, international, within-patient, multi-centre, level-1 evidence trial in participants referred to hospital with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiologist interpretation of MRI +/- prostate biopsy | Active Comparator | Radiologist Interpretation |
|
| AI interpretation of MRI +/- prostate biopsy | Experimental | AI Interpretation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI (Lucida Pi) interpretation | Diagnostic Test | AI algorithm that will interpretate the prostate MRI |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of men with clinically significant cancer | Proportion of men with clinically significant cancer detected (any pattern 4 disease on any core (i.e. Gleason Grade ≥ 3+4/Gleason grade group ≥2). | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer | Proportion of men with clinically insignificant cancer detected (Gleason grade 3+3/Gleason grade group 1). | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Proportion of men with non-suspicious MRIs |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior prostate biopsy
Prior prostate MRI on a previous encounter*
Prior treatment for prostate cancer
Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker)
Metalwork that would give rise to artefact on MRI (e.g. hip prosthesis, pelvic/spinal metalwork)
Contraindication to prostate biopsy
Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ng Alexander, MBBS BSc (Hons) | Contact | +44 0207 679 5057 | alexander.ng@ucl.ac.uk | |
| PARADIGM Study Team | Contact | med.paradigm@ucl.ac.uk |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Veeru Kasivisvanathan, MBBS BSc FRCS MSc PGCert PhD | Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK | Study Chair |
| Doug Pendse, MB ChB MD (Res) MRCS FRCR | Department of Radiology, Universiy College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK |
Not provided
Anonymised data will be available at request for bona fide researchers with important research questions subject to approval by the study steering committee.
Data will become available 1 year after publication of the main study results.
A study steering committee will review all requests for access to the data and will make decisions on whether or not to grant access to bona fide researchers based on the importance of the research question being asked, ensuring analysis is non overlapping with existing analyses and planned analyses.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Within-person controlled, paired cohort, diagnostic evaluation study. Participants undergo two index tests and a reference test.
Not provided
Not provided
AI and Radiologist interpreting the MRI for suspicion of prostate cancer are blinded to each other. After both reports are produced, they are unblinded, and a merged report is produced. All bioopsies are conducted as a result of both the AI and Radiologist interpretation, and as a result, lesions will be identified as AI and Radiologist positive, or negative, as appropriate. Diagnostic accuracy will be assessed against histology findings.
| Radiologist interpretation | Diagnostic Test | Radiologist will interpret the prostate MRI (as per standard of care) |
|
Proportion of men with non-suspicious MRIs for AI vs Radiologists |
| When MRI results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-MRI |
| Proportion of MRIs with indeterminate scores. | Proportion of men with indeterminately scored MRI as reported by AI vs radiologists | When MRI results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-MRI |
| Agreement between AI and Radiologist in score of suspicion | Compare the proportion of MRIs with concordant scores between AI and Radiologist in score of suspicion | When MRI results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-MRI |
| Diagnostic test performance characteristics (AI versus Radiologist) | Test performance characteristics for AI and Radiologists, including sensitivity, specificity, area under the receive operating characteristic curve, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Diagnostic test performance characteristics (AI plus Radiologist) | Test performance characteristics of AI in combination with Radiologist (summative of all identified lesions) compared to a radiologist alone, including sensitivity, specificity, area under the receive operating characteristic curve, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Diagnostic test performance characteristics (AI-assisted Radiologist) | Test performance characteristics of AI in combination with Radiologist (where the radiologist can interact with the AI system by accepting or rejecting AI-identified lesions) compared to a radiologist alone, including sensitivity, specificity, area under the receive operating characteristic curve, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Significant cancer detected by peri-lesional biopsies | Proportion of patients with significant cancer detected taking into account peri-lesional biopsies of AI and Radiologist declared lesions. | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Significant cancer detected by systematic biopsies | Proportion of patients with significant cancer detected by systematic biopsies | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Frequency of AI failures | Proportion of patients where AI was unable to interpret the MRI scan | When MRI results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-MRI |
| Treatment eligibility decisions | Proportion of patients where treatment eligibility changed between AI and Radiologist | When biopsy results available, at an expected average of 30 days post-biopsy |
| Cost-efffectiveness | Cost-effectiveness of unblinded AI interpreted by the radiologist compared to radiologist alone in detecting significant prostate cancer, and AI alone vs. radiologist alone, and a 3-arm analysis considering all three. | At an expected average of 30 days post-intervention |
| Study Chair |