Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This Phase 3 study will evaluate whether lesion network mapping-guided continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) can improve recovery after acute ischemic stroke. The treatment uses each participant's brain imaging to identify individualized stimulation targets related to stroke symptoms. Participants will receive either active cTBS or a sham procedure in addition to standard stroke care. The study will assess whether this personalized brain stimulation approach improves functional recovery and is safe for patients after ischemic stroke.
Acute ischemic stroke often leads to persistent motor impairment despite standard medical treatment and rehabilitation. The early post-stroke period may represent an important window for modulating brain network plasticity and promoting recovery. Continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a patterned form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, can modulate cortical excitability over a short stimulation period and may support recovery when applied to clinically relevant motor networks.
This study evaluates a personalized neuromodulation approach based on lesion network mapping. For each participant, the acute infarct lesion is identified on clinical brain imaging and mapped to a reference functional connectome to estimate lesion-associated networks. Candidate stimulation targets are selected from symptom-relevant cortical network nodes, with consideration of accessibility, safety, and electric-field modeling. Neuronavigation is used to guide coil placement and maintain targeting accuracy.
Active treatment consists of lesion network mapping-guided cTBS delivered to individualized cortical targets using a figure-8 coil under neuronavigation. Sham stimulation follows the same imaging-based target selection, electric-field modeling, positioning, and procedural workflow, but uses a sham coil designed to mimic the sensory and acoustic features of stimulation without delivering a therapeutic magnetic field. This approach is intended to maintain blinding while isolating the effect of active stimulation.
This Phase 3 trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of individualized lesion network mapping-guided cTBS for recovery after acute ischemic stroke.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LNM-navigated cTBS group | Experimental | Participants receive active lesion network mapping (LNM)-navigated continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS). |
|
| Sham cTBS group | Sham Comparator | Participants receive sham LNM-navigated cTBS using procedures that mimic the active intervention. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNM-navigated cTBS | Device | Individualized treatment targets are defined by outlining each patient's acute infarct lesion on MRI and projecting it onto a normative functional connectivity map to identify symptom-relevant network nodes within sensorimotor regions. Treatment is delivered over seven consecutive days using a figure-8 coil guided by neuronavigation. cTBS consists of 3-pulse bursts at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, for a total of 600 pulses over 40 seconds, delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold (RMT). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-2 | Day 90 post-randomization | |
| Proportion experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs) | Proportion experiencing serious adverse events (SAEs), including seizures | Within 90 days post-randomization |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution shift in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score | Distribution shift in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at Day 90 post-randomization. The mRS is an ordinal disability scale ranging from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates no symptoms and 6 indicates death. Higher scores indicate worse functional outcome. | Day 90 post-randomization |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lingling Ding, MD | Contact | 008613552358752 | dinglingling@bjtth.org | |
| Zixiao Li, MD | Contact | lizixiao2008@hotmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Tiantan Hospital | Beijing | 100070 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37314250 | Result | Ding L, Liu H, Jing J, Jiang Y, Meng X, Chen Y, Zhao X, Niu H, Liu T, Wang Y, Li Z. Lesion Network Mapping for Neurological Deficit in Acute Ischemic Stroke. Ann Neurol. 2023 Sep;94(3):572-584. doi: 10.1002/ana.26721. Epub 2023 Jun 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000083242 | Ischemic Stroke |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants, care providers, investigators, and outcomes assessors are all blinded to treatment allocation. A separate, unblinded technician prepares and operates the stimulation device according to randomized codes but has no role in clinical assessments, data collection, or patient care beyond administering the sessions. Treatment codes remain concealed until database lock, except in predefined emergencies requiring unblinding for safety.
|
| Sham cTBS | Device | Sham stimulation follows the same MRI-based lesion mapping, target selection, neuronavigation workflow, coil positioning, timing, acoustic noise, and treatment course as the active group, but uses a sham figure-8 coil that mimics stimulation without generating a significant magnetic field. This design helps maintain blinding of participants and assessors while ensuring that no effective magnetic stimulation is delivered. |
|
| Proportion of patients achieving mRS 0-1 |
| Day 90 post-randomization |
| Change from baseline in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score at Day 7 | Change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) total score from baseline to Day 7 post-randomization. The NIHSS total score ranges from 0 to 42; higher scores indicate a more severe neurological deficit and worse outcome. Change is calculated as the Day 7 score minus the baseline score. A negative change indicates improvement. | Day 7 post-randomization |
| Change from baseline in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke motor score at Day 7 | Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke motor score from baseline to Day 7 post-randomization. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment motor score ranges from 0 to 100, including an upper extremity motor score ranging from 0 to 66 and a lower extremity motor score ranging from 0 to 34. Higher scores indicate better motor recovery and less motor impairment. Change is calculated as the Day 7 score minus the baseline score; a positive change indicates improvement. | Day 7 post-randomization |
| Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living score at Day 90 | Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living score at Day 90 post-randomization. The Barthel Index assesses independence in 10 activities of daily living and mobility activities. Total scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate greater independence and better functional outcome. | Day 90 post-randomization |
| EuroQol 5-Dimension 3-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) health utility index score | EQ-5D-3L utility index score at Day 90 post-randomization. Health states based on the five EQ-5D dimensions are converted to a utility index using the applicable EQ-5D-3L value set. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life. | Day 90 post-randomization |
| Early neurological deterioration | Proportion of patients with neurological deterioration (defined as a ≥4-point increase in NIHSS score) within 7 days post-randomisation. | 7 days post-randomisation |
| Proportion of participants with insomnia | The proportion of participants with insomnia reported within 7 days after randomization. | Within 7 days after randomization. |
| Proportion of participants with headache | The proportion of participants with headache reported within 7 days after randomization; | Within 7 days after randomization; |
| Proportion of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage | The proportion of participants with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage reported within 7 days after randomization. | Within 7 days after randomization. |
| All-Cause Mortality | Proportion of patients who died from any cause | Within 90 days post-randomization |
| Proportion with symptomatic stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) | Within 90 days post-randomization |
| Any Adverse Events (AEs) | Proportion experiencing any adverse events | Within 90 days post-randomization |
| D009422 |
| Nervous System Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |